Cargando…

The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review

Over the last 40 years osteosarcoma (OS) survival has stagnated with patients commonly resistant to neoadjuvant MAP chemotherapy involving high dose methotrexate, adriamycin (doxorubicin) and platinum (cisplatin). Due to the rarity of OS, the generation of relevant cell models as tools for drug disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tippett, Victoria L., Tattersall, Luke, Ab Latif, Norain B., Shah, Karan M., Lawson, Michelle A., Gartland, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02529-x
_version_ 1784874430892081152
author Tippett, Victoria L.
Tattersall, Luke
Ab Latif, Norain B.
Shah, Karan M.
Lawson, Michelle A.
Gartland, Alison
author_facet Tippett, Victoria L.
Tattersall, Luke
Ab Latif, Norain B.
Shah, Karan M.
Lawson, Michelle A.
Gartland, Alison
author_sort Tippett, Victoria L.
collection PubMed
description Over the last 40 years osteosarcoma (OS) survival has stagnated with patients commonly resistant to neoadjuvant MAP chemotherapy involving high dose methotrexate, adriamycin (doxorubicin) and platinum (cisplatin). Due to the rarity of OS, the generation of relevant cell models as tools for drug discovery is paramount to tackling this issue. Four literature databases were systematically searched using pre-determined search terms to identify MAP resistant OS cell lines and patients. Drug exposure strategies used to develop cell models of resistance and the impact of these on the differential expression of resistance associated genes, proteins and non-coding RNAs are reported. A comparison to clinical studies in relation to chemotherapy response, relapse and metastasis was then made. The search retrieved 1891 papers of which 52 were relevant. Commonly, cell lines were derived from Caucasian patients with epithelial or fibroblastic subtypes. The strategy for model development varied with most opting for continuous over pulsed chemotherapy exposure. A diverse resistance level was observed between models (2.2–338 fold) with 63% of models exceeding clinically reported resistance levels which may affect the expression of chemoresistance factors. In vitro p-glycoprotein overexpression is a key resistance mechanism; however, from the available literature to date this does not translate to innate resistance in patients. The selection of models with a lower fold resistance may better reflect the clinical situation. A comparison of standardised strategies in models and variants should be performed to determine their impact on resistance markers. Clinical studies are required to determine the impact of resistance markers identified in vitro in poor responders to MAP treatment, specifically with respect to innate and acquired resistance. A shift from seeking disputed and undruggable mechanisms to clinically relevant resistance mechanisms may identify key resistance markers that can be targeted for patient benefit after a 40-year wait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9859755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98597552023-01-22 The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review Tippett, Victoria L. Tattersall, Luke Ab Latif, Norain B. Shah, Karan M. Lawson, Michelle A. Gartland, Alison Oncogene Review Article Over the last 40 years osteosarcoma (OS) survival has stagnated with patients commonly resistant to neoadjuvant MAP chemotherapy involving high dose methotrexate, adriamycin (doxorubicin) and platinum (cisplatin). Due to the rarity of OS, the generation of relevant cell models as tools for drug discovery is paramount to tackling this issue. Four literature databases were systematically searched using pre-determined search terms to identify MAP resistant OS cell lines and patients. Drug exposure strategies used to develop cell models of resistance and the impact of these on the differential expression of resistance associated genes, proteins and non-coding RNAs are reported. A comparison to clinical studies in relation to chemotherapy response, relapse and metastasis was then made. The search retrieved 1891 papers of which 52 were relevant. Commonly, cell lines were derived from Caucasian patients with epithelial or fibroblastic subtypes. The strategy for model development varied with most opting for continuous over pulsed chemotherapy exposure. A diverse resistance level was observed between models (2.2–338 fold) with 63% of models exceeding clinically reported resistance levels which may affect the expression of chemoresistance factors. In vitro p-glycoprotein overexpression is a key resistance mechanism; however, from the available literature to date this does not translate to innate resistance in patients. The selection of models with a lower fold resistance may better reflect the clinical situation. A comparison of standardised strategies in models and variants should be performed to determine their impact on resistance markers. Clinical studies are required to determine the impact of resistance markers identified in vitro in poor responders to MAP treatment, specifically with respect to innate and acquired resistance. A shift from seeking disputed and undruggable mechanisms to clinically relevant resistance mechanisms may identify key resistance markers that can be targeted for patient benefit after a 40-year wait. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9859755/ /pubmed/36434179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02529-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Tippett, Victoria L.
Tattersall, Luke
Ab Latif, Norain B.
Shah, Karan M.
Lawson, Michelle A.
Gartland, Alison
The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title_full The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title_fullStr The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title_short The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
title_sort strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of map resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02529-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tippettvictorial thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT tattersallluke thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT ablatifnorainb thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT shahkaranm thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT lawsonmichellea thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT gartlandalison thestrategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT tippettvictorial strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT tattersallluke strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT ablatifnorainb strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT shahkaranm strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT lawsonmichellea strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview
AT gartlandalison strategyandclinicalrelevanceofinvitromodelsofmapresistanceinosteosarcomaasystematicreview