Cargando…
Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Short-acting β(2)-agonist (SABA) reliever overuse is common in asthma, despite availability of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance therapies, and may be associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2 |
_version_ | 1784874458419298304 |
---|---|
author | Sriprasart, Thitiwat Waterer, Grant Garcia, Gabriel Rubin, Adalberto Andrade, Marco Antonio Loustaunau Roguska, Agnieszka Phansalkar, Abhay Fulmali, Sourabh Martin, Amber Mittal, Lalith Aggarwal, Bhumika Levy, Gur |
author_facet | Sriprasart, Thitiwat Waterer, Grant Garcia, Gabriel Rubin, Adalberto Andrade, Marco Antonio Loustaunau Roguska, Agnieszka Phansalkar, Abhay Fulmali, Sourabh Martin, Amber Mittal, Lalith Aggarwal, Bhumika Levy, Gur |
author_sort | Sriprasart, Thitiwat |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Short-acting β(2)-agonist (SABA) reliever overuse is common in asthma, despite availability of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance therapies, and may be associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of SABA reliever monotherapy for adults and adolescents with asthma, through analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence. METHODS: An SLR of English-language publications between January 1996 and December 2021 included RCTs and observational studies of patients aged ≥ 12 years treated with inhaled SABA reliever monotherapy (fixed dose or as needed) for ≥ 4 weeks. Studies of terbutaline and fenoterol were excluded. Meta-analysis feasibility was dependent on cross-trial data comparability. A random-effects model estimated rates of mortality, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs (DAEs) for as-needed and fixed-dose SABA treatment groups. ICS monotherapy and SABA therapy were compared using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were identified by the SLR for assessment of feasibility. Final meta-analysis included 24 RCTs. Too few observational studies (n = 2) were available for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One death unrelated to treatment was reported in each of the ICS, ICS + LABA, and fixed-dose SABA groups. No other treatment-related deaths were reported. SAE and DAE rates were < 4%. DAEs were reported more frequently in the SABA treatment groups than with ICS, potentially owing to worsening asthma symptoms being classified as an AE. SAE risk was comparable between SABA and ICS treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of data from RCTs showed that deaths were rare with SABA reliever monotherapy, and rates of SAEs and DAEs were comparable between SABA reliever and ICS treatment groups. When used appropriately within prescribed limits as reliever therapy, SABA does not contribute to excess rates of mortality, SAEs, or DAEs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9859883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98598832023-01-22 Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sriprasart, Thitiwat Waterer, Grant Garcia, Gabriel Rubin, Adalberto Andrade, Marco Antonio Loustaunau Roguska, Agnieszka Phansalkar, Abhay Fulmali, Sourabh Martin, Amber Mittal, Lalith Aggarwal, Bhumika Levy, Gur Adv Ther Review INTRODUCTION: Short-acting β(2)-agonist (SABA) reliever overuse is common in asthma, despite availability of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance therapies, and may be associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of SABA reliever monotherapy for adults and adolescents with asthma, through analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence. METHODS: An SLR of English-language publications between January 1996 and December 2021 included RCTs and observational studies of patients aged ≥ 12 years treated with inhaled SABA reliever monotherapy (fixed dose or as needed) for ≥ 4 weeks. Studies of terbutaline and fenoterol were excluded. Meta-analysis feasibility was dependent on cross-trial data comparability. A random-effects model estimated rates of mortality, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs (DAEs) for as-needed and fixed-dose SABA treatment groups. ICS monotherapy and SABA therapy were compared using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were identified by the SLR for assessment of feasibility. Final meta-analysis included 24 RCTs. Too few observational studies (n = 2) were available for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One death unrelated to treatment was reported in each of the ICS, ICS + LABA, and fixed-dose SABA groups. No other treatment-related deaths were reported. SAE and DAE rates were < 4%. DAEs were reported more frequently in the SABA treatment groups than with ICS, potentially owing to worsening asthma symptoms being classified as an AE. SAE risk was comparable between SABA and ICS treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of data from RCTs showed that deaths were rare with SABA reliever monotherapy, and rates of SAEs and DAEs were comparable between SABA reliever and ICS treatment groups. When used appropriately within prescribed limits as reliever therapy, SABA does not contribute to excess rates of mortality, SAEs, or DAEs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2. Springer Healthcare 2022-11-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9859883/ /pubmed/36348141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Sriprasart, Thitiwat Waterer, Grant Garcia, Gabriel Rubin, Adalberto Andrade, Marco Antonio Loustaunau Roguska, Agnieszka Phansalkar, Abhay Fulmali, Sourabh Martin, Amber Mittal, Lalith Aggarwal, Bhumika Levy, Gur Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety of saba monotherapy in asthma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sriprasartthitiwat safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT waterergrant safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT garciagabriel safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rubinadalberto safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andrademarcoantonioloustaunau safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roguskaagnieszka safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT phansalkarabhay safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fulmalisourabh safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinamber safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mittallalith safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aggarwalbhumika safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT levygur safetyofsabamonotherapyinasthmamanagementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |