Cargando…

Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores

PURPOSE: To estimate the clinical impact of differences between delivered and planned dose using dose metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. METHODS: Forty‐six consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 treated with intensity‐modulated radiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammers, Jacob, Lindsay, Daniel, Narayanasamy, Ganesh, Sud, Shivani, Tan, Xianming, Dooley, John, Marks, Lawrence B., Chen, Ronald C., Das, Shiva K., Mavroidis, Panayiotis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13780
_version_ 1784874473078390784
author Hammers, Jacob
Lindsay, Daniel
Narayanasamy, Ganesh
Sud, Shivani
Tan, Xianming
Dooley, John
Marks, Lawrence B.
Chen, Ronald C.
Das, Shiva K.
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
author_facet Hammers, Jacob
Lindsay, Daniel
Narayanasamy, Ganesh
Sud, Shivani
Tan, Xianming
Dooley, John
Marks, Lawrence B.
Chen, Ronald C.
Das, Shiva K.
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
author_sort Hammers, Jacob
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To estimate the clinical impact of differences between delivered and planned dose using dose metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. METHODS: Forty‐six consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and who had undergone computed tomography on rails imaging were included. Delivered doses to bladder and rectum were estimated using a contour‐based deformable image registration method. The bladder and rectum NTCP were calculated using dose–response parameters applied to planned and delivered dose distributions. Seven urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms were prospectively collected using the validated prostate cancer symptom indices patient reported outcome (PRO) at pre‐treatment, weekly treatment, and post‐treatment follow‐up visits. Correlations between planned and delivered doses against PRO were evaluated in this study. RESULTS: Planned mean doses to bladder and rectum were 44.9 ± 13.6 Gy and 42.8 ± 7.3 Gy, while delivered doses were 46.1 ± 13.4 Gy and 41.3 ± 8.7 Gy, respectively. D (10cc) for rectum was 64.1 ± 7.6 Gy for planned and 60.1 ± 9.3 Gy for delivered doses. NTCP values of treatment plan were 22.3% ± 8.4% and 12.6% ± 5.9%, while those for delivered doses were 23.2% ± 8.4% and 9.9% ± 8.3% for bladder and rectum, respectively. Seven of 25 patients with follow‐up data showed urinary complications (28%) and three had rectal complications (12%). Correlations of NTCP values of planned and delivered doses with PRO follow‐up data were random for bladder and moderate for rectum (0.68 and 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of bladder to clinical variations of dose accumulation indicates that an automated solution based on a DIR that considers inter‐fractional organ deformation could recommend intervention. This is intended to achieve additional rectum sparing in cases that indicate higher than expected dose accumulation early during patient treatment in order to prevent acute severity of bowel symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9859987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98599872023-01-24 Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores Hammers, Jacob Lindsay, Daniel Narayanasamy, Ganesh Sud, Shivani Tan, Xianming Dooley, John Marks, Lawrence B. Chen, Ronald C. Das, Shiva K. Mavroidis, Panayiotis J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To estimate the clinical impact of differences between delivered and planned dose using dose metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. METHODS: Forty‐six consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and who had undergone computed tomography on rails imaging were included. Delivered doses to bladder and rectum were estimated using a contour‐based deformable image registration method. The bladder and rectum NTCP were calculated using dose–response parameters applied to planned and delivered dose distributions. Seven urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms were prospectively collected using the validated prostate cancer symptom indices patient reported outcome (PRO) at pre‐treatment, weekly treatment, and post‐treatment follow‐up visits. Correlations between planned and delivered doses against PRO were evaluated in this study. RESULTS: Planned mean doses to bladder and rectum were 44.9 ± 13.6 Gy and 42.8 ± 7.3 Gy, while delivered doses were 46.1 ± 13.4 Gy and 41.3 ± 8.7 Gy, respectively. D (10cc) for rectum was 64.1 ± 7.6 Gy for planned and 60.1 ± 9.3 Gy for delivered doses. NTCP values of treatment plan were 22.3% ± 8.4% and 12.6% ± 5.9%, while those for delivered doses were 23.2% ± 8.4% and 9.9% ± 8.3% for bladder and rectum, respectively. Seven of 25 patients with follow‐up data showed urinary complications (28%) and three had rectal complications (12%). Correlations of NTCP values of planned and delivered doses with PRO follow‐up data were random for bladder and moderate for rectum (0.68 and 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of bladder to clinical variations of dose accumulation indicates that an automated solution based on a DIR that considers inter‐fractional organ deformation could recommend intervention. This is intended to achieve additional rectum sparing in cases that indicate higher than expected dose accumulation early during patient treatment in order to prevent acute severity of bowel symptoms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9859987/ /pubmed/36087039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13780 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hammers, Jacob
Lindsay, Daniel
Narayanasamy, Ganesh
Sud, Shivani
Tan, Xianming
Dooley, John
Marks, Lawrence B.
Chen, Ronald C.
Das, Shiva K.
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title_full Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title_fullStr Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title_short Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT‐on‐rails IGRT and patient‐reported outcome scores
title_sort evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on ct‐on‐rails igrt and patient‐reported outcome scores
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13780
work_keys_str_mv AT hammersjacob evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT lindsaydaniel evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT narayanasamyganesh evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT sudshivani evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT tanxianming evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT dooleyjohn evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT markslawrenceb evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT chenronaldc evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT dasshivak evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores
AT mavroidispanayiotis evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofthedifferencesbetweenplannedanddelivereddoseinprostatecancerradiotherapybasedonctonrailsigrtandpatientreportedoutcomescores