Cargando…

Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations

Recent publications have called into question the accuracy of reference tenth‐value layer (TVL) data cited in official reports for linac primary concrete barriers. Doubts have arisen based on both experimental and theoretical evidence. Most of the standard reference TVL values trace back to a public...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McDermott, Patrick N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13847
_version_ 1784874474544300032
author McDermott, Patrick N.
author_facet McDermott, Patrick N.
author_sort McDermott, Patrick N.
collection PubMed
description Recent publications have called into question the accuracy of reference tenth‐value layer (TVL) data cited in official reports for linac primary concrete barriers. Doubts have arisen based on both experimental and theoretical evidence. Most of the standard reference TVL values trace back to a publication that appeared in 1984 that used beam spectra that are not representative of modern linacs. This study reports a new set of TVL data for concrete based on modern linac beam spectra and a definition of the barrier transmission that is consistent with its use in shielding calculations. TVL values have been computed for concrete using Monte Carlo simulation for beam energies of 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV. The barrier transmission depends on the field size at the barrier and the distance from the distal surface of the barrier to the point of observation. The TVL values reported here lead to barrier transmission values that are up to a factor of 4 larger than those in official reports. The air kerma rate beyond the barrier does not obey an inverse square law as the barrier now acts like a new (non‐point) source of radiation. For distance greater than 0.3 m from the distal side of the barrier, inverse square predictions of the air kerma rate are low by up to a factor of 2. The average energy of the transmitted photons declines rapidly for all beam energies with increasing barrier thickness up to a thickness of about 50 cm and then slowly increases with increasing thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9859993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98599932023-01-24 Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations McDermott, Patrick N. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Protection & Regulations Recent publications have called into question the accuracy of reference tenth‐value layer (TVL) data cited in official reports for linac primary concrete barriers. Doubts have arisen based on both experimental and theoretical evidence. Most of the standard reference TVL values trace back to a publication that appeared in 1984 that used beam spectra that are not representative of modern linacs. This study reports a new set of TVL data for concrete based on modern linac beam spectra and a definition of the barrier transmission that is consistent with its use in shielding calculations. TVL values have been computed for concrete using Monte Carlo simulation for beam energies of 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV. The barrier transmission depends on the field size at the barrier and the distance from the distal surface of the barrier to the point of observation. The TVL values reported here lead to barrier transmission values that are up to a factor of 4 larger than those in official reports. The air kerma rate beyond the barrier does not obey an inverse square law as the barrier now acts like a new (non‐point) source of radiation. For distance greater than 0.3 m from the distal side of the barrier, inverse square predictions of the air kerma rate are low by up to a factor of 2. The average energy of the transmitted photons declines rapidly for all beam energies with increasing barrier thickness up to a thickness of about 50 cm and then slowly increases with increasing thickness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9859993/ /pubmed/36471480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13847 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Protection & Regulations
McDermott, Patrick N.
Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title_full Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title_fullStr Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title_full_unstemmed Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title_short Linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: Monte Carlo calculations
title_sort linac primary barrier transmission for concrete: monte carlo calculations
topic Radiation Protection & Regulations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13847
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdermottpatrickn linacprimarybarriertransmissionforconcretemontecarlocalculations