Cargando…

Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study

PURPOSE: Quantitative measurements of activity in SPECT are important for radioisotope therapy planning and disease diagnosis. The aim of this manuscript is to develop a robust method to quantify the total activity in a volume‐of‐interest (VOI) of different quantitative SPECT reconstructions and val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bian, Junguo, James, Judy R, Wagner, Robert, Halama, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13828
_version_ 1784874476038520832
author Bian, Junguo
James, Judy R
Wagner, Robert
Halama, James
author_facet Bian, Junguo
James, Judy R
Wagner, Robert
Halama, James
author_sort Bian, Junguo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quantitative measurements of activity in SPECT are important for radioisotope therapy planning and disease diagnosis. The aim of this manuscript is to develop a robust method to quantify the total activity in a volume‐of‐interest (VOI) of different quantitative SPECT reconstructions and validate the estimation accuracy. METHODS: We customized an IEC body phantom using 3D printing technology and made six sphere inserts of 1–6 cm in diameter with at least 3 cm separation. The activity concentration within the spheres was in the range of patient lesion/organ activity. The background activity was then increased from zero to a sphere/background activity concentration of 8:1, 4:1, and 2:1. SPECT data were acquired with Philips Brightview and GE Discovery 670 SPECT/computed tomography (CT) systems under clinical acquisition protocols. Quantitative SPECT images were reconstructed with Hermes SUV‐SPECT (both Philips and GE data) and GE Q.Metrix (GE data only). The quantitative SPECT reconstructions are iterative with scatter, CT attenuation correction, and resolution recovery. We quantified the total activity by expanding the sphere VOI to include a spill‐out region. Background correction was applied by sampling a region outside the spill‐out region. The true fractions (TFs) (total activity/true activity) were measured for all six spheres for all SPECT acquisitions. RESULTS: The TF is close to 100% for 2–6 cm spheres for zero background, 8:1 and 4:1 sphere/background activity ratios. The TF was found to be unreliable for the 1‐cm sphere because of the limit of phantom design. TF accuracy for 2:1 sphere/background ratio was degraded due to significantly large background, inadequate scatter correction and detector count loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the proposed quantification method is accurate for objects of different sizes in currently clinical quantitative reconstruction and has the potential for improving the accuracy for therapeutic treatment planning or radiation dosimetry calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9859999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98599992023-01-24 Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study Bian, Junguo James, Judy R Wagner, Robert Halama, James J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: Quantitative measurements of activity in SPECT are important for radioisotope therapy planning and disease diagnosis. The aim of this manuscript is to develop a robust method to quantify the total activity in a volume‐of‐interest (VOI) of different quantitative SPECT reconstructions and validate the estimation accuracy. METHODS: We customized an IEC body phantom using 3D printing technology and made six sphere inserts of 1–6 cm in diameter with at least 3 cm separation. The activity concentration within the spheres was in the range of patient lesion/organ activity. The background activity was then increased from zero to a sphere/background activity concentration of 8:1, 4:1, and 2:1. SPECT data were acquired with Philips Brightview and GE Discovery 670 SPECT/computed tomography (CT) systems under clinical acquisition protocols. Quantitative SPECT images were reconstructed with Hermes SUV‐SPECT (both Philips and GE data) and GE Q.Metrix (GE data only). The quantitative SPECT reconstructions are iterative with scatter, CT attenuation correction, and resolution recovery. We quantified the total activity by expanding the sphere VOI to include a spill‐out region. Background correction was applied by sampling a region outside the spill‐out region. The true fractions (TFs) (total activity/true activity) were measured for all six spheres for all SPECT acquisitions. RESULTS: The TF is close to 100% for 2–6 cm spheres for zero background, 8:1 and 4:1 sphere/background activity ratios. The TF was found to be unreliable for the 1‐cm sphere because of the limit of phantom design. TF accuracy for 2:1 sphere/background ratio was degraded due to significantly large background, inadequate scatter correction and detector count loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the proposed quantification method is accurate for objects of different sizes in currently clinical quantitative reconstruction and has the potential for improving the accuracy for therapeutic treatment planning or radiation dosimetry calculations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9859999/ /pubmed/36347052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13828 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Bian, Junguo
James, Judy R
Wagner, Robert
Halama, James
Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title_full Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title_fullStr Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title_short Quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study
title_sort quantify total activity by volume‐of‐interest expansion with clinical spect/ct systems, a phantom study
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13828
work_keys_str_mv AT bianjunguo quantifytotalactivitybyvolumeofinterestexpansionwithclinicalspectctsystemsaphantomstudy
AT jamesjudyr quantifytotalactivitybyvolumeofinterestexpansionwithclinicalspectctsystemsaphantomstudy
AT wagnerrobert quantifytotalactivitybyvolumeofinterestexpansionwithclinicalspectctsystemsaphantomstudy
AT halamajames quantifytotalactivitybyvolumeofinterestexpansionwithclinicalspectctsystemsaphantomstudy