Cargando…

A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The COVID‐19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in general. Its use has been widely adopted in the healthcare sector, but relatively little research has been conducted on the use of telemedicine for podiatry. This review aimed to explore and compare existing guide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann, Formosa, Cynthia, Chockalingam, Nachiappan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1076
_version_ 1784874567127269376
author Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann
Formosa, Cynthia
Chockalingam, Nachiappan
author_facet Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann
Formosa, Cynthia
Chockalingam, Nachiappan
author_sort Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The COVID‐19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in general. Its use has been widely adopted in the healthcare sector, but relatively little research has been conducted on the use of telemedicine for podiatry. This review aimed to explore and compare existing guidelines on telemedicine related to foot and ankle pathologies within a primary care setting. METHODS: The preferred reporting guidelines for the extension of scoping reviews were used in this review, and a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and implemented. This study made use of both databases and gray literature searches. Between 2012 and 2022, these databases were searched using various subject headings and free‐text terms for the keywords “telemedicine” “foot health” and “guidelines” with appropriate Boolean operators. RESULTS: The search yielded 356 articles, which were reduced to 283 after removing duplicates. Six more records were discovered through a Google and Google Scholar search and one through an article reference search. Six articles and three institutional practice guidelines were selected for synthesis after screening. The findings were classified according to the level of evidence and research quality, the function of telemedicine and the communication used, the research outcomes sought, and the type of recommendations and guidelines made available. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the lack of podiatric telemedicine guidelines for foot and ankle pathologies. Although foot and ankle guidelines for orthopedic and musculoskeletal virtual consultations have been mentioned, they do not cover the full range of potential case scenarios that fall within the remit of podiatric consultations in a primary care setting. This review suggests the development of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines with recommendations on how they can better provide accessible care to their patients, making foot and ankle care management not only a hand‐on‐one but also reachable virtually, where applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9860371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98603712023-01-24 A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann Formosa, Cynthia Chockalingam, Nachiappan Health Sci Rep Narrative Review BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The COVID‐19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in general. Its use has been widely adopted in the healthcare sector, but relatively little research has been conducted on the use of telemedicine for podiatry. This review aimed to explore and compare existing guidelines on telemedicine related to foot and ankle pathologies within a primary care setting. METHODS: The preferred reporting guidelines for the extension of scoping reviews were used in this review, and a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and implemented. This study made use of both databases and gray literature searches. Between 2012 and 2022, these databases were searched using various subject headings and free‐text terms for the keywords “telemedicine” “foot health” and “guidelines” with appropriate Boolean operators. RESULTS: The search yielded 356 articles, which were reduced to 283 after removing duplicates. Six more records were discovered through a Google and Google Scholar search and one through an article reference search. Six articles and three institutional practice guidelines were selected for synthesis after screening. The findings were classified according to the level of evidence and research quality, the function of telemedicine and the communication used, the research outcomes sought, and the type of recommendations and guidelines made available. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the lack of podiatric telemedicine guidelines for foot and ankle pathologies. Although foot and ankle guidelines for orthopedic and musculoskeletal virtual consultations have been mentioned, they do not cover the full range of potential case scenarios that fall within the remit of podiatric consultations in a primary care setting. This review suggests the development of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines with recommendations on how they can better provide accessible care to their patients, making foot and ankle care management not only a hand‐on‐one but also reachable virtually, where applicable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9860371/ /pubmed/36698701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1076 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Stojmanovski Mercieca, Lisa Ann
Formosa, Cynthia
Chockalingam, Nachiappan
A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title_full A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title_fullStr A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title_short A scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
title_sort scoping review of foot and ankle telemedicine guidelines
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1076
work_keys_str_mv AT stojmanovskimerciecalisaann ascopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines
AT formosacynthia ascopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines
AT chockalingamnachiappan ascopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines
AT stojmanovskimerciecalisaann scopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines
AT formosacynthia scopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines
AT chockalingamnachiappan scopingreviewoffootandankletelemedicineguidelines