Cargando…

No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A stratified approach to exercise therapy may yield superior clinical and economic outcomes, given the large heterogeneity of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness during a 12-month follow-up of a model of stratified exercise therapy com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knoop, Jesper, Esser, Jonas, Dekker, Joost, de Joode, J. Willemijn, Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G., van Dongen, Johanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100469
_version_ 1784874580889829376
author Knoop, Jesper
Esser, Jonas
Dekker, Joost
de Joode, J. Willemijn
Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
author_facet Knoop, Jesper
Esser, Jonas
Dekker, Joost
de Joode, J. Willemijn
Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
author_sort Knoop, Jesper
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A stratified approach to exercise therapy may yield superior clinical and economic outcomes, given the large heterogeneity of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness during a 12-month follow-up of a model of stratified exercise therapy compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA, from a societal and healthcare perspective. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a cluster-randomized controlled trial in patients with knee OA (n = 335), comparing subgroup-specific exercise therapy for a ‘high muscle strength subgroup’, ‘low muscle strength subgroup’, and ‘obesity subgroup’ supplemented by a dietary intervention for the ‘obesity subgroup’ (experimental group), with usual (‘non-stratified’) exercise therapy (control group). Clinical outcomes included quality-adjusted life years – QALYs (EuroQol-5D-5 L), knee pain (Numerical Rating Scale) and physical functioning (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in daily living). Costs were measured by self-reported questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Data were analyzed through linear regression. Bootstrapping techniques were applied to estimate statistical uncertainty. RESULTS: During 12-month follow-up, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. The total societal costs of the experimental group were on average lower compared to the control group (mean [95% confidence interval]: € 405 [-1728, 918]), albeit with a high level of uncertainty. We found a negligible difference in QALYs between groups (mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.006 [-0.011, 0.023]). The probability of stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy from the societal perspective was around 73%, regardless of the willingness-to-pay threshold. However, this probability decreased substantially to 50% (willingness-to-pay threshold of €20.000/QALY) when using the healthcare perspective. Similar results were found for knee pain and physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: We found no clear evidence that stratified exercise therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA. However, results should be interpreted with caution as the study power was lower than intended, due to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9860430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98604302023-01-24 No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial Knoop, Jesper Esser, Jonas Dekker, Joost de Joode, J. Willemijn Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G. van Dongen, Johanna M. Braz J Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: A stratified approach to exercise therapy may yield superior clinical and economic outcomes, given the large heterogeneity of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness during a 12-month follow-up of a model of stratified exercise therapy compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA, from a societal and healthcare perspective. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a cluster-randomized controlled trial in patients with knee OA (n = 335), comparing subgroup-specific exercise therapy for a ‘high muscle strength subgroup’, ‘low muscle strength subgroup’, and ‘obesity subgroup’ supplemented by a dietary intervention for the ‘obesity subgroup’ (experimental group), with usual (‘non-stratified’) exercise therapy (control group). Clinical outcomes included quality-adjusted life years – QALYs (EuroQol-5D-5 L), knee pain (Numerical Rating Scale) and physical functioning (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in daily living). Costs were measured by self-reported questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Data were analyzed through linear regression. Bootstrapping techniques were applied to estimate statistical uncertainty. RESULTS: During 12-month follow-up, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. The total societal costs of the experimental group were on average lower compared to the control group (mean [95% confidence interval]: € 405 [-1728, 918]), albeit with a high level of uncertainty. We found a negligible difference in QALYs between groups (mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.006 [-0.011, 0.023]). The probability of stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy from the societal perspective was around 73%, regardless of the willingness-to-pay threshold. However, this probability decreased substantially to 50% (willingness-to-pay threshold of €20.000/QALY) when using the healthcare perspective. Similar results were found for knee pain and physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: We found no clear evidence that stratified exercise therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee OA. However, results should be interpreted with caution as the study power was lower than intended, due to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2023 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9860430/ /pubmed/36657217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100469 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Knoop, Jesper
Esser, Jonas
Dekker, Joost
de Joode, J. Willemijn
Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short No evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort no evidence for stratified exercise therapy being cost-effective compared to usual exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: economic evaluation alongside cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100469
work_keys_str_mv AT knoopjesper noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT esserjonas noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dekkerjoost noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dejoodejwillemijn noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT osteloraymondwjg noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandongenjohannam noevidenceforstratifiedexercisetherapybeingcosteffectivecomparedtousualexercisetherapyinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritiseconomicevaluationalongsideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial