Cargando…

Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology

IMPORTANCE: Preference signals were to be implemented in over 15 specialties during the 2022-2023 residency match. Analyzing results from the implementation of signals during the American Urological Association (AUA) urology match may inform future behavior. OBJECTIVE: To characterize applicant and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grauer, Ralph, Ranti, Daniel, Greene, Kirsten, Gorin, Michael A., Menon, Mani, Zorc, Saša
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36662528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50974
_version_ 1784874603283218432
author Grauer, Ralph
Ranti, Daniel
Greene, Kirsten
Gorin, Michael A.
Menon, Mani
Zorc, Saša
author_facet Grauer, Ralph
Ranti, Daniel
Greene, Kirsten
Gorin, Michael A.
Menon, Mani
Zorc, Saša
author_sort Grauer, Ralph
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Preference signals were to be implemented in over 15 specialties during the 2022-2023 residency match. Analyzing results from the implementation of signals during the American Urological Association (AUA) urology match may inform future behavior. OBJECTIVE: To characterize applicant and program signal usage and results in the Society of Academic Urology and AUA databases with respect to interview invites and rank list creation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved all applicants and residencies in the 2021-2022 AUA match with data analysis conducted in April through July 2022. EXPOSURES: Five signals indicating interest. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Using verified match and survey data reported by applicants and programs, a logistic regression was performed on applicant factors associated with obtaining an interview—the main outcome (using inclusion on rank list as a proxy): age, gender, degree (MD or DO), dispersal of signal, US senior status, racial minority group status, Latino ethnicity, international medical graduate status, presence of a home program, AUA geographic section, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. Applicant signal dispersal strategies were stratified by applicant and program competitiveness, as well as program behavior upon receipt of signal with respect to extending interviews and rank list ordering of applicants. RESULTS: A total of 2659 signals were sent by 553 candidates (mean [SD] age, 27.4 [2.9] years; 179 female [32.4%], 243 racial minority candidates [61.2%]) submitting rank lists for 364 positions at 143 programs. Programs received a median (IQR) of 352 (295-411) applications and were signaled to a median of 16 (8-26) times each. In a logistic regression estimating interview status, geographic proximity (OR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.05-5.15; P = .001) and signal status (OR, 6.04; 95% CI, 3.50-10.40; P < .001) were associated with receiving an interview. Using multiple imputation by chained equations to impute missing data and broadening the data set, male gender (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = .04) and international medical graduate status (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = .04) were negative variables, while MD degree (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.27-4.36; P = .02) and US senior status (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.13-3.23; P = .04) were positive variables. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study of the usage and trends of the newly added preference signals reported the most common strategies for signal dispersal; in an analysis of factors involved in obtaining an interview, geographic similarity between applicant and program and preference signal usage were associated with successful applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9860522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98605222023-02-03 Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology Grauer, Ralph Ranti, Daniel Greene, Kirsten Gorin, Michael A. Menon, Mani Zorc, Saša JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Preference signals were to be implemented in over 15 specialties during the 2022-2023 residency match. Analyzing results from the implementation of signals during the American Urological Association (AUA) urology match may inform future behavior. OBJECTIVE: To characterize applicant and program signal usage and results in the Society of Academic Urology and AUA databases with respect to interview invites and rank list creation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved all applicants and residencies in the 2021-2022 AUA match with data analysis conducted in April through July 2022. EXPOSURES: Five signals indicating interest. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Using verified match and survey data reported by applicants and programs, a logistic regression was performed on applicant factors associated with obtaining an interview—the main outcome (using inclusion on rank list as a proxy): age, gender, degree (MD or DO), dispersal of signal, US senior status, racial minority group status, Latino ethnicity, international medical graduate status, presence of a home program, AUA geographic section, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. Applicant signal dispersal strategies were stratified by applicant and program competitiveness, as well as program behavior upon receipt of signal with respect to extending interviews and rank list ordering of applicants. RESULTS: A total of 2659 signals were sent by 553 candidates (mean [SD] age, 27.4 [2.9] years; 179 female [32.4%], 243 racial minority candidates [61.2%]) submitting rank lists for 364 positions at 143 programs. Programs received a median (IQR) of 352 (295-411) applications and were signaled to a median of 16 (8-26) times each. In a logistic regression estimating interview status, geographic proximity (OR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.05-5.15; P = .001) and signal status (OR, 6.04; 95% CI, 3.50-10.40; P < .001) were associated with receiving an interview. Using multiple imputation by chained equations to impute missing data and broadening the data set, male gender (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = .04) and international medical graduate status (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = .04) were negative variables, while MD degree (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.27-4.36; P = .02) and US senior status (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.13-3.23; P = .04) were positive variables. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study of the usage and trends of the newly added preference signals reported the most common strategies for signal dispersal; in an analysis of factors involved in obtaining an interview, geographic similarity between applicant and program and preference signal usage were associated with successful applications. American Medical Association 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9860522/ /pubmed/36662528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50974 Text en Copyright 2023 Grauer R et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Grauer, Ralph
Ranti, Daniel
Greene, Kirsten
Gorin, Michael A.
Menon, Mani
Zorc, Saša
Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title_full Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title_fullStr Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title_short Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology
title_sort characterization of applicant preference signals, invitations for interviews, and inclusion on match lists for residency positions in urology
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36662528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50974
work_keys_str_mv AT grauerralph characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology
AT rantidaniel characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology
AT greenekirsten characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology
AT gorinmichaela characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology
AT menonmani characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology
AT zorcsasa characterizationofapplicantpreferencesignalsinvitationsforinterviewsandinclusiononmatchlistsforresidencypositionsinurology