Cargando…

How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers

To reach large groups of vaccine recipients, several high-income countries introduced mass vaccination centers for COVID-19. Understanding user experiences of these novel structures can help optimize their design and increase patient satisfaction and vaccine uptake. This study drew on user online re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danek, Stella, Büttner, Martha, Krois, Joachim, Schwendicke, Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010144
_version_ 1784874763951276032
author Danek, Stella
Büttner, Martha
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
author_facet Danek, Stella
Büttner, Martha
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
author_sort Danek, Stella
collection PubMed
description To reach large groups of vaccine recipients, several high-income countries introduced mass vaccination centers for COVID-19. Understanding user experiences of these novel structures can help optimize their design and increase patient satisfaction and vaccine uptake. This study drew on user online reviews of vaccination centers to assess user experience and identify its key determinants over time, by sentiment, and by interaction. Machine learning methods were used to analyze Google reviews of six COVID-19 mass vaccination centers in Berlin from December 2020 to December 2021. 3647 user online reviews were included in the analysis. Of these, 89% (3261/3647) were positive according to user rating (four to five of five stars). A total of 85% (2740/3647) of all reviews contained text. Topic modeling of the reviews containing text identified five optimally latent topics, and keyword extraction identified 47 salient keywords. The most important themes were organization, friendliness/responsiveness, and patient flow/wait time. Key interactions for users of vaccination centers included waiting, scheduling, transit, and the vaccination itself. Keywords connected to scheduling and efficiency, such as “appointment” and “wait”, were most prominent in negative reviews. Over time, the average rating score decreased from 4.7 to 4.1, and waiting and duration became more salient keywords. Overall, mass vaccination centers appear to be positively perceived, yet users became more critical over the one-year period of the pandemic vaccination campaign observed. The study shows that online reviews can provide real-time insights into newly set-up infrastructures, and policymakers should consider their use to monitor the population’s response over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9861127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98611272023-01-22 How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers Danek, Stella Büttner, Martha Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk Vaccines (Basel) Article To reach large groups of vaccine recipients, several high-income countries introduced mass vaccination centers for COVID-19. Understanding user experiences of these novel structures can help optimize their design and increase patient satisfaction and vaccine uptake. This study drew on user online reviews of vaccination centers to assess user experience and identify its key determinants over time, by sentiment, and by interaction. Machine learning methods were used to analyze Google reviews of six COVID-19 mass vaccination centers in Berlin from December 2020 to December 2021. 3647 user online reviews were included in the analysis. Of these, 89% (3261/3647) were positive according to user rating (four to five of five stars). A total of 85% (2740/3647) of all reviews contained text. Topic modeling of the reviews containing text identified five optimally latent topics, and keyword extraction identified 47 salient keywords. The most important themes were organization, friendliness/responsiveness, and patient flow/wait time. Key interactions for users of vaccination centers included waiting, scheduling, transit, and the vaccination itself. Keywords connected to scheduling and efficiency, such as “appointment” and “wait”, were most prominent in negative reviews. Over time, the average rating score decreased from 4.7 to 4.1, and waiting and duration became more salient keywords. Overall, mass vaccination centers appear to be positively perceived, yet users became more critical over the one-year period of the pandemic vaccination campaign observed. The study shows that online reviews can provide real-time insights into newly set-up infrastructures, and policymakers should consider their use to monitor the population’s response over time. MDPI 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9861127/ /pubmed/36679989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010144 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Danek, Stella
Büttner, Martha
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title_full How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title_fullStr How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title_full_unstemmed How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title_short How Do Users Respond to Mass Vaccination Centers? A Cross-Sectional Study Using Natural Language Processing on Online Reviews to Explore User Experience and Satisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccination Centers
title_sort how do users respond to mass vaccination centers? a cross-sectional study using natural language processing on online reviews to explore user experience and satisfaction with covid-19 vaccination centers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010144
work_keys_str_mv AT danekstella howdousersrespondtomassvaccinationcentersacrosssectionalstudyusingnaturallanguageprocessingononlinereviewstoexploreuserexperienceandsatisfactionwithcovid19vaccinationcenters
AT buttnermartha howdousersrespondtomassvaccinationcentersacrosssectionalstudyusingnaturallanguageprocessingononlinereviewstoexploreuserexperienceandsatisfactionwithcovid19vaccinationcenters
AT kroisjoachim howdousersrespondtomassvaccinationcentersacrosssectionalstudyusingnaturallanguageprocessingononlinereviewstoexploreuserexperienceandsatisfactionwithcovid19vaccinationcenters
AT schwendickefalk howdousersrespondtomassvaccinationcentersacrosssectionalstudyusingnaturallanguageprocessingononlinereviewstoexploreuserexperienceandsatisfactionwithcovid19vaccinationcenters