Cargando…

Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

The use of indirect calorimetry to measure resting energy expenditure (mREE) is widely recommended as opposed to calculating REE (cREE) by predictive equations (PE). The aim of this study was to compare mREE with cREE in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients aged ≥ 75 years and a healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindner, Matthias, Geisler, Corinna, Rembarz, Kristina, Hummitzsch, Lars, Radke, David I., Schulte, Dominik M., Müller, Manfred J., Bosy-Westphal, Anja, Elke, Gunnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020303
_version_ 1784874769391288320
author Lindner, Matthias
Geisler, Corinna
Rembarz, Kristina
Hummitzsch, Lars
Radke, David I.
Schulte, Dominik M.
Müller, Manfred J.
Bosy-Westphal, Anja
Elke, Gunnar
author_facet Lindner, Matthias
Geisler, Corinna
Rembarz, Kristina
Hummitzsch, Lars
Radke, David I.
Schulte, Dominik M.
Müller, Manfred J.
Bosy-Westphal, Anja
Elke, Gunnar
author_sort Lindner, Matthias
collection PubMed
description The use of indirect calorimetry to measure resting energy expenditure (mREE) is widely recommended as opposed to calculating REE (cREE) by predictive equations (PE). The aim of this study was to compare mREE with cREE in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients aged ≥ 75 years and a healthy control group matched by age, gender and body mass index. The primary outcome was the PE accuracy rate of mREE/cREE, derived using Bland Altman plots. Secondary analyses included linear regression analyses for determinants of intraindividual mREE/cREE differences in the critically ill and interindividual mREE differences in the matched healthy cohort. In this retrospective study, 90 critically ill patients (median age 80 years) and 58 matched healthy persons were included. Median mREE was significantly higher in the critically ill (1457 kcal/d) versus the healthy cohort (1351 kcal/d), with low PE accuracy rates (21% to 49%). Independent predictors of mREE/cREE differences in the critically ill were body temperature, heart rate, FiO(2), hematocrit, serum sodium and urea. Body temperature, respiratory rate, and FiO(2) were independent predictors of interindividual mREE differences (critically ill versus healthy control). In conclusion, the commonly used PE in the elderly critically ill are inaccurate. Respiratory, metabolic and energy homeostasis variables may explain intraindividual mREE/cREE as well as interindividual mREE differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9861149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98611492023-01-22 Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study Lindner, Matthias Geisler, Corinna Rembarz, Kristina Hummitzsch, Lars Radke, David I. Schulte, Dominik M. Müller, Manfred J. Bosy-Westphal, Anja Elke, Gunnar Nutrients Article The use of indirect calorimetry to measure resting energy expenditure (mREE) is widely recommended as opposed to calculating REE (cREE) by predictive equations (PE). The aim of this study was to compare mREE with cREE in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients aged ≥ 75 years and a healthy control group matched by age, gender and body mass index. The primary outcome was the PE accuracy rate of mREE/cREE, derived using Bland Altman plots. Secondary analyses included linear regression analyses for determinants of intraindividual mREE/cREE differences in the critically ill and interindividual mREE differences in the matched healthy cohort. In this retrospective study, 90 critically ill patients (median age 80 years) and 58 matched healthy persons were included. Median mREE was significantly higher in the critically ill (1457 kcal/d) versus the healthy cohort (1351 kcal/d), with low PE accuracy rates (21% to 49%). Independent predictors of mREE/cREE differences in the critically ill were body temperature, heart rate, FiO(2), hematocrit, serum sodium and urea. Body temperature, respiratory rate, and FiO(2) were independent predictors of interindividual mREE differences (critically ill versus healthy control). In conclusion, the commonly used PE in the elderly critically ill are inaccurate. Respiratory, metabolic and energy homeostasis variables may explain intraindividual mREE/cREE as well as interindividual mREE differences. MDPI 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9861149/ /pubmed/36678174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020303 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lindner, Matthias
Geisler, Corinna
Rembarz, Kristina
Hummitzsch, Lars
Radke, David I.
Schulte, Dominik M.
Müller, Manfred J.
Bosy-Westphal, Anja
Elke, Gunnar
Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title_full Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title_fullStr Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title_short Resting Energy Expenditure in the Critically Ill and Healthy Elderly—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
title_sort resting energy expenditure in the critically ill and healthy elderly—a retrospective matched cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020303
work_keys_str_mv AT lindnermatthias restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT geislercorinna restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT rembarzkristina restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT hummitzschlars restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT radkedavidi restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT schultedominikm restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT mullermanfredj restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT bosywestphalanja restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT elkegunnar restingenergyexpenditureinthecriticallyillandhealthyelderlyaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy