Cargando…

Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete

The article presents research on the performance of different distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) tools, including both layered cables and monolithic composite sensors. The main need for the presented research was related to the growing applications of the DFOS techniques for the measurements of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howiacki, Tomasz, Sieńko, Rafał, Bednarski, Łukasz, Zuziak, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020566
_version_ 1784874913036763136
author Howiacki, Tomasz
Sieńko, Rafał
Bednarski, Łukasz
Zuziak, Katarzyna
author_facet Howiacki, Tomasz
Sieńko, Rafał
Bednarski, Łukasz
Zuziak, Katarzyna
author_sort Howiacki, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description The article presents research on the performance of different distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) tools, including both layered cables and monolithic composite sensors. The main need for the presented research was related to the growing applications of the DFOS techniques for the measurements of cracked concrete structures. There are no clear guidelines on the required parameters of the DFOS tools, which, despite their different designs, are offered for the same purpose (strain sensing). The state-of-the-art review and previous experiences show noticeable differences in the quality of the results depending on the applied DFOS tool. The technical construction of selected solutions was described with its theoretical consequences, and then laboratory tests on full-size reinforced concrete beams were discussed. Beams equipped with embedded tools were investigated in four-point bending tests, causing the formation of multiple cracks in the tension zone along the beams’ length. The results in the form of strain profiles registered by selected DFOS tools were analysed regarding the qualitative (crack detection) and quantitative (width estimation) crack assessment. The comparison between crack-induced strain profiles was based on a new parameter called crack shape coefficient CSC, which could be applied to assess the effectiveness of the particular DFOS tool in crack detection and analysis. It was one of the world’s first research allowing for such direct comparison between the layered and monolithic sensing tools. The summary indicates practical guidelines referring to the preferable design of the tools best suitable for crack measurements, as well as the field proofs based on data from two concrete bridges in Germany.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9861723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98617232023-01-22 Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete Howiacki, Tomasz Sieńko, Rafał Bednarski, Łukasz Zuziak, Katarzyna Sensors (Basel) Article The article presents research on the performance of different distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) tools, including both layered cables and monolithic composite sensors. The main need for the presented research was related to the growing applications of the DFOS techniques for the measurements of cracked concrete structures. There are no clear guidelines on the required parameters of the DFOS tools, which, despite their different designs, are offered for the same purpose (strain sensing). The state-of-the-art review and previous experiences show noticeable differences in the quality of the results depending on the applied DFOS tool. The technical construction of selected solutions was described with its theoretical consequences, and then laboratory tests on full-size reinforced concrete beams were discussed. Beams equipped with embedded tools were investigated in four-point bending tests, causing the formation of multiple cracks in the tension zone along the beams’ length. The results in the form of strain profiles registered by selected DFOS tools were analysed regarding the qualitative (crack detection) and quantitative (width estimation) crack assessment. The comparison between crack-induced strain profiles was based on a new parameter called crack shape coefficient CSC, which could be applied to assess the effectiveness of the particular DFOS tool in crack detection and analysis. It was one of the world’s first research allowing for such direct comparison between the layered and monolithic sensing tools. The summary indicates practical guidelines referring to the preferable design of the tools best suitable for crack measurements, as well as the field proofs based on data from two concrete bridges in Germany. MDPI 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9861723/ /pubmed/36679365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020566 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Howiacki, Tomasz
Sieńko, Rafał
Bednarski, Łukasz
Zuziak, Katarzyna
Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title_full Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title_fullStr Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title_short Crack Shape Coefficient: Comparison between Different DFOS Tools Embedded for Crack Monitoring in Concrete
title_sort crack shape coefficient: comparison between different dfos tools embedded for crack monitoring in concrete
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9861723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020566
work_keys_str_mv AT howiackitomasz crackshapecoefficientcomparisonbetweendifferentdfostoolsembeddedforcrackmonitoringinconcrete
AT sienkorafał crackshapecoefficientcomparisonbetweendifferentdfostoolsembeddedforcrackmonitoringinconcrete
AT bednarskiłukasz crackshapecoefficientcomparisonbetweendifferentdfostoolsembeddedforcrackmonitoringinconcrete
AT zuziakkatarzyna crackshapecoefficientcomparisonbetweendifferentdfostoolsembeddedforcrackmonitoringinconcrete