Cargando…
Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil
(1) Background: COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil has been performed mostly with CoronaVac (Sinovac), ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca-University of Oxford) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines. The titers of IgG antibodies reactive to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein correlate with vaccine efficacy. Studies comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010021 |
_version_ | 1784875084822872064 |
---|---|
author | Paula, Nigella M. Conzentino, Marcelo S. Gonçalves, Ana C. A. da Silva, Renata Weissheimer, Karin V. Kluge, Carlos H. S. Marins, Paulo H. S. A. Camargo, Haxley S. C. Farias, Lucas R. P. Sant’Ana, Thamyres P. Vargas, Letícia R. Aldrighi, Juliane D. Lima, Ênio S. Jacotenski, Guiomar T. Pedrosa, Fabio O. Gonçalves, Alan G. Joucoski, Emerson Huergo, Luciano F. |
author_facet | Paula, Nigella M. Conzentino, Marcelo S. Gonçalves, Ana C. A. da Silva, Renata Weissheimer, Karin V. Kluge, Carlos H. S. Marins, Paulo H. S. A. Camargo, Haxley S. C. Farias, Lucas R. P. Sant’Ana, Thamyres P. Vargas, Letícia R. Aldrighi, Juliane D. Lima, Ênio S. Jacotenski, Guiomar T. Pedrosa, Fabio O. Gonçalves, Alan G. Joucoski, Emerson Huergo, Luciano F. |
author_sort | Paula, Nigella M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil has been performed mostly with CoronaVac (Sinovac), ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca-University of Oxford) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines. The titers of IgG antibodies reactive to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein correlate with vaccine efficacy. Studies comparing vaccine immunogenicity in a real-world scenario are lacking. (2) Methods: We performed a population-based study to analyze the immunoglobulin G response to different COVID-19 vaccines. Citizens older than 18 years (n = 2376) provided personal data, a self-declaration of any previous COVID-19 positive tests and information regarding COVID-19 vaccination: the vaccine popular name and the date of each dose. Blood samples were collected and the levels of IgG reactive to SARS-CoV-2 antigens were determined and compared between different vaccine groups. (3) Results: The seroconversion for anti-spike IgG achieved > 95% by February 2022 and maintained stable until June 2022. Higher anti-spike IgG titers were detected in individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2, followed by ChAdOx1-S and CoronaVac. The anti-spike IgG response was negatively correlated with age and interval after the second dose for the BNT162b2 vaccine. Natural infections boosted anti-spike IgG in those individuals who completed primary vaccination with ChAdOx1-S and CoronaVac, but not with BNT162b2. The levels of anti-spike IgG increased with the number of vaccine doses administered. The application of BNT162b2 as a 3rd booster dose resulted in high anti-spike IgG antibody titers, despite the type of vaccine used during primary vaccination. (4) Conclusions: Our data confirmed the effectiveness of the Brazilian vaccination program. Of the vaccines used in Brazil, BNT162b2 performed better to elicit anti-spike protein IgG after primary vaccination and as a booster dose and thus should be recommended as a booster whenever available. A continuous COVID-19 vaccination program will be required to sustain anti-spike IgG antibodies in the population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9862407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98624072023-01-22 Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil Paula, Nigella M. Conzentino, Marcelo S. Gonçalves, Ana C. A. da Silva, Renata Weissheimer, Karin V. Kluge, Carlos H. S. Marins, Paulo H. S. A. Camargo, Haxley S. C. Farias, Lucas R. P. Sant’Ana, Thamyres P. Vargas, Letícia R. Aldrighi, Juliane D. Lima, Ênio S. Jacotenski, Guiomar T. Pedrosa, Fabio O. Gonçalves, Alan G. Joucoski, Emerson Huergo, Luciano F. Vaccines (Basel) Article (1) Background: COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil has been performed mostly with CoronaVac (Sinovac), ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca-University of Oxford) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines. The titers of IgG antibodies reactive to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein correlate with vaccine efficacy. Studies comparing vaccine immunogenicity in a real-world scenario are lacking. (2) Methods: We performed a population-based study to analyze the immunoglobulin G response to different COVID-19 vaccines. Citizens older than 18 years (n = 2376) provided personal data, a self-declaration of any previous COVID-19 positive tests and information regarding COVID-19 vaccination: the vaccine popular name and the date of each dose. Blood samples were collected and the levels of IgG reactive to SARS-CoV-2 antigens were determined and compared between different vaccine groups. (3) Results: The seroconversion for anti-spike IgG achieved > 95% by February 2022 and maintained stable until June 2022. Higher anti-spike IgG titers were detected in individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2, followed by ChAdOx1-S and CoronaVac. The anti-spike IgG response was negatively correlated with age and interval after the second dose for the BNT162b2 vaccine. Natural infections boosted anti-spike IgG in those individuals who completed primary vaccination with ChAdOx1-S and CoronaVac, but not with BNT162b2. The levels of anti-spike IgG increased with the number of vaccine doses administered. The application of BNT162b2 as a 3rd booster dose resulted in high anti-spike IgG antibody titers, despite the type of vaccine used during primary vaccination. (4) Conclusions: Our data confirmed the effectiveness of the Brazilian vaccination program. Of the vaccines used in Brazil, BNT162b2 performed better to elicit anti-spike protein IgG after primary vaccination and as a booster dose and thus should be recommended as a booster whenever available. A continuous COVID-19 vaccination program will be required to sustain anti-spike IgG antibodies in the population. MDPI 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9862407/ /pubmed/36679871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010021 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Paula, Nigella M. Conzentino, Marcelo S. Gonçalves, Ana C. A. da Silva, Renata Weissheimer, Karin V. Kluge, Carlos H. S. Marins, Paulo H. S. A. Camargo, Haxley S. C. Farias, Lucas R. P. Sant’Ana, Thamyres P. Vargas, Letícia R. Aldrighi, Juliane D. Lima, Ênio S. Jacotenski, Guiomar T. Pedrosa, Fabio O. Gonçalves, Alan G. Joucoski, Emerson Huergo, Luciano F. Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title | Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title_full | Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title_fullStr | Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title_short | Population-Based Analysis of the Immunoglobulin G Response to Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Brazil |
title_sort | population-based analysis of the immunoglobulin g response to different covid-19 vaccines in brazil |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulanigellam populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT conzentinomarcelos populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT goncalvesanaca populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT dasilvarenata populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT weissheimerkarinv populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT klugecarloshs populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT marinspaulohsa populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT camargohaxleysc populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT fariaslucasrp populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT santanathamyresp populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT vargasleticiar populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT aldrighijulianed populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT limaenios populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT jacotenskiguiomart populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT pedrosafabioo populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT goncalvesalang populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT joucoskiemerson populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil AT huergolucianof populationbasedanalysisoftheimmunoglobulingresponsetodifferentcovid19vaccinesinbrazil |