Cargando…

Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis

The assessment of red fox population density is considered relevant to the surveillance of zoonotic agents vectored by this species. However, density is difficult to estimate reliably, since the ecological plasticity and elusive behavior of this carnivore hinder classic methods of inference. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celva, Roberto, Crestanello, Barbara, Obber, Federica, Dellamaria, Debora, Trevisiol, Karin, Bregoli, Marco, Cenni, Lucia, Agreiter, Andreas, Danesi, Patrizia, Hauffe, Heidi Christine, Citterio, Carlo Vittorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010060
_version_ 1784875112984477696
author Celva, Roberto
Crestanello, Barbara
Obber, Federica
Dellamaria, Debora
Trevisiol, Karin
Bregoli, Marco
Cenni, Lucia
Agreiter, Andreas
Danesi, Patrizia
Hauffe, Heidi Christine
Citterio, Carlo Vittorio
author_facet Celva, Roberto
Crestanello, Barbara
Obber, Federica
Dellamaria, Debora
Trevisiol, Karin
Bregoli, Marco
Cenni, Lucia
Agreiter, Andreas
Danesi, Patrizia
Hauffe, Heidi Christine
Citterio, Carlo Vittorio
author_sort Celva, Roberto
collection PubMed
description The assessment of red fox population density is considered relevant to the surveillance of zoonotic agents vectored by this species. However, density is difficult to estimate reliably, since the ecological plasticity and elusive behavior of this carnivore hinder classic methods of inference. In this study, red fox population density was estimated using a non-invasive molecular spatial capture-recapture (SCR) approach in two study areas: one in a known hotspot of the zoonotic cestode Echinococcus multilocularis, and another naïve to the parasite. Parasitological investigations on collected samples confirmed the presence of the parasite exclusively in the former area; the SCR results indicated a higher fox population density in the control area than in the hotspot, suggesting either that the relationship between fox density and parasite prevalence is not linear and/or the existence of other latent factors supporting the parasitic cycle in the known focus. In addition, fox spotlight count data for the two study areas were used to estimate the index of kilometric abundance (IKA). Although this method is cheaper and less time-consuming than SCR, IKA values were the highest in the areas with the lower molecular SCR density estimates, confirming that IKA should be regarded as a relative index only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9862526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98625262023-01-22 Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis Celva, Roberto Crestanello, Barbara Obber, Federica Dellamaria, Debora Trevisiol, Karin Bregoli, Marco Cenni, Lucia Agreiter, Andreas Danesi, Patrizia Hauffe, Heidi Christine Citterio, Carlo Vittorio Pathogens Article The assessment of red fox population density is considered relevant to the surveillance of zoonotic agents vectored by this species. However, density is difficult to estimate reliably, since the ecological plasticity and elusive behavior of this carnivore hinder classic methods of inference. In this study, red fox population density was estimated using a non-invasive molecular spatial capture-recapture (SCR) approach in two study areas: one in a known hotspot of the zoonotic cestode Echinococcus multilocularis, and another naïve to the parasite. Parasitological investigations on collected samples confirmed the presence of the parasite exclusively in the former area; the SCR results indicated a higher fox population density in the control area than in the hotspot, suggesting either that the relationship between fox density and parasite prevalence is not linear and/or the existence of other latent factors supporting the parasitic cycle in the known focus. In addition, fox spotlight count data for the two study areas were used to estimate the index of kilometric abundance (IKA). Although this method is cheaper and less time-consuming than SCR, IKA values were the highest in the areas with the lower molecular SCR density estimates, confirming that IKA should be regarded as a relative index only. MDPI 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9862526/ /pubmed/36678408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010060 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Celva, Roberto
Crestanello, Barbara
Obber, Federica
Dellamaria, Debora
Trevisiol, Karin
Bregoli, Marco
Cenni, Lucia
Agreiter, Andreas
Danesi, Patrizia
Hauffe, Heidi Christine
Citterio, Carlo Vittorio
Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title_full Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title_fullStr Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title_short Assessing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Demographics to Monitor Wildlife Diseases: A Spotlight on Echinococcus multilocularis
title_sort assessing red fox (vulpes vulpes) demographics to monitor wildlife diseases: a spotlight on echinococcus multilocularis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010060
work_keys_str_mv AT celvaroberto assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT crestanellobarbara assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT obberfederica assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT dellamariadebora assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT trevisiolkarin assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT bregolimarco assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT cennilucia assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT agreiterandreas assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT danesipatrizia assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT hauffeheidichristine assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis
AT citteriocarlovittorio assessingredfoxvulpesvulpesdemographicstomonitorwildlifediseasesaspotlightonechinococcusmultilocularis