Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: To analyze the differences in efficacy and safety of different types of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) vaccines in different age groups (young adults and elderly). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on COVID-19 vaccine in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane libr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010033 |
_version_ | 1784875189237972992 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lei Jiang, Lihong Tian, Tian Li, Wenjing Pan, Yonghui Wang, Yongchen |
author_facet | Zhang, Lei Jiang, Lihong Tian, Tian Li, Wenjing Pan, Yonghui Wang, Yongchen |
author_sort | Zhang, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To analyze the differences in efficacy and safety of different types of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) vaccines in different age groups (young adults and elderly). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on COVID-19 vaccine in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched by computer, and eight eligible studies were analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 and RevMan5.4 software. Results: The mean geometric titer (GMT) of the virus in the elderly was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI (0.68, 1.15), p < 0.01), presenting no obvious difference compared with the young adults (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI (0.38, 0.01), p = 0.06). Meanwhile, the effect of multiple vaccinations was better than that of single vaccination (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI (0.33, 1.34), p < 0.01). However, the number of adverse events (AEs) in the elderly was lower than that in the young adults (OR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.29, 0.42), p < 0.01). Conclusions: The immunization effect of COVID-19 vaccine in the elderly is obvious, especially after multiple vaccinations, and the incidence of AEs in the elderly is low, which proves that the vaccination of the elderly is safe and effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9862835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98628352023-01-22 Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lei Jiang, Lihong Tian, Tian Li, Wenjing Pan, Yonghui Wang, Yongchen Vaccines (Basel) Review Objective: To analyze the differences in efficacy and safety of different types of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) vaccines in different age groups (young adults and elderly). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on COVID-19 vaccine in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched by computer, and eight eligible studies were analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 and RevMan5.4 software. Results: The mean geometric titer (GMT) of the virus in the elderly was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI (0.68, 1.15), p < 0.01), presenting no obvious difference compared with the young adults (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI (0.38, 0.01), p = 0.06). Meanwhile, the effect of multiple vaccinations was better than that of single vaccination (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI (0.33, 1.34), p < 0.01). However, the number of adverse events (AEs) in the elderly was lower than that in the young adults (OR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.29, 0.42), p < 0.01). Conclusions: The immunization effect of COVID-19 vaccine in the elderly is obvious, especially after multiple vaccinations, and the incidence of AEs in the elderly is low, which proves that the vaccination of the elderly is safe and effective. MDPI 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9862835/ /pubmed/36679878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010033 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Zhang, Lei Jiang, Lihong Tian, Tian Li, Wenjing Pan, Yonghui Wang, Yongchen Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of covid-19 vaccination in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglei efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jianglihong efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tiantian efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liwenjing efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panyonghui efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyongchen efficacyandsafetyofcovid19vaccinationinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |