Cargando…

Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study

Bracket failure is one of the most important problems encountered during fixed orthodontic treatment. For this reason, different types of adhesive agents have been developed over the years. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to teeth etched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eser, Irfan, Cicek, Orhan, Ozkalayci, Nurhat, Yetmez, Mehmet, Erener, Hande
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36676460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16020724
_version_ 1784875243319328768
author Eser, Irfan
Cicek, Orhan
Ozkalayci, Nurhat
Yetmez, Mehmet
Erener, Hande
author_facet Eser, Irfan
Cicek, Orhan
Ozkalayci, Nurhat
Yetmez, Mehmet
Erener, Hande
author_sort Eser, Irfan
collection PubMed
description Bracket failure is one of the most important problems encountered during fixed orthodontic treatment. For this reason, different types of adhesive agents have been developed over the years. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to teeth etched with a conventional acid etching method in a laboratory environment by using different types of adhesive agents and comparing the number of shear strokes. Sixty human maxillary premolars were divided into three groups and Gemini stainless steel metal brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded to all teeth. In Group 1, Transbond™ XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste composite (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were used. In Group 2, BracePaste(®) MTP Primer (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, CA, USA) and BracePaste(®) Adhesive composite (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were used. In Group 3, Ortho Solo™ Primer (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) and Grengloo™ Adhesive composite (Ormco, Brea, CA, USA) were used. The samples were subjected to a shear test with a closed-loop controlled, low-cycle fatigue machine with a capacity of 10 N and a crosshead speed of 300 mm/min. The number of shear strokes of the brackets was recorded. According to the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests performed on the data obtained, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the numbers of shear strokes (p < 0.05). Significantly higher numbers of shear strokes and higher shear bond strengths were observed in Group 3 compared with Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the numbers of shear strokes for Group 1 and Group 2 samples (p > 0.05). To conclude the study, it was observed that the type of adhesive used had an effect on the bond strength of the bracket and that the Grengloo™ adhesive agent showed higher shear bond strength. It was observed that BracePaste(®) Adhesive and Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste adhesive agents had similar shear bond strengths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9863063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98630632023-01-22 Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study Eser, Irfan Cicek, Orhan Ozkalayci, Nurhat Yetmez, Mehmet Erener, Hande Materials (Basel) Article Bracket failure is one of the most important problems encountered during fixed orthodontic treatment. For this reason, different types of adhesive agents have been developed over the years. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to teeth etched with a conventional acid etching method in a laboratory environment by using different types of adhesive agents and comparing the number of shear strokes. Sixty human maxillary premolars were divided into three groups and Gemini stainless steel metal brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded to all teeth. In Group 1, Transbond™ XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste composite (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were used. In Group 2, BracePaste(®) MTP Primer (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, CA, USA) and BracePaste(®) Adhesive composite (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were used. In Group 3, Ortho Solo™ Primer (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) and Grengloo™ Adhesive composite (Ormco, Brea, CA, USA) were used. The samples were subjected to a shear test with a closed-loop controlled, low-cycle fatigue machine with a capacity of 10 N and a crosshead speed of 300 mm/min. The number of shear strokes of the brackets was recorded. According to the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests performed on the data obtained, statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the numbers of shear strokes (p < 0.05). Significantly higher numbers of shear strokes and higher shear bond strengths were observed in Group 3 compared with Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the numbers of shear strokes for Group 1 and Group 2 samples (p > 0.05). To conclude the study, it was observed that the type of adhesive used had an effect on the bond strength of the bracket and that the Grengloo™ adhesive agent showed higher shear bond strength. It was observed that BracePaste(®) Adhesive and Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste adhesive agents had similar shear bond strengths. MDPI 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9863063/ /pubmed/36676460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16020724 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Eser, Irfan
Cicek, Orhan
Ozkalayci, Nurhat
Yetmez, Mehmet
Erener, Hande
Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title_full Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title_fullStr Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title_short Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study
title_sort effect of different types of adhesive agents on orthodontic bracket shear bond strength: a cyclic loading study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36676460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16020724
work_keys_str_mv AT eserirfan effectofdifferenttypesofadhesiveagentsonorthodonticbracketshearbondstrengthacyclicloadingstudy
AT cicekorhan effectofdifferenttypesofadhesiveagentsonorthodonticbracketshearbondstrengthacyclicloadingstudy
AT ozkalaycinurhat effectofdifferenttypesofadhesiveagentsonorthodonticbracketshearbondstrengthacyclicloadingstudy
AT yetmezmehmet effectofdifferenttypesofadhesiveagentsonorthodonticbracketshearbondstrengthacyclicloadingstudy
AT erenerhande effectofdifferenttypesofadhesiveagentsonorthodonticbracketshearbondstrengthacyclicloadingstudy