Cargando…
Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater
Integrated wastewater treatment processes are accepted as the best option for sustainable and unrestricted onsite water reuse. In this study, moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), membrane bioreactor (MBR), and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) treatment steps were integrated successively to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36676823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010016 |
_version_ | 1784875257122783232 |
---|---|
author | Alharthi, Mamdouh S. Bamaga, Omar Abulkhair, Hani Organji, Husam Shaiban, Amer Macedonio, Francesca Criscuoli, Alessandra Drioli, Enrico Wang, Zhaohui Cui, Zhaoliang Jin, Wanqin Albeirutty, Mohammed |
author_facet | Alharthi, Mamdouh S. Bamaga, Omar Abulkhair, Hani Organji, Husam Shaiban, Amer Macedonio, Francesca Criscuoli, Alessandra Drioli, Enrico Wang, Zhaohui Cui, Zhaoliang Jin, Wanqin Albeirutty, Mohammed |
author_sort | Alharthi, Mamdouh S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Integrated wastewater treatment processes are accepted as the best option for sustainable and unrestricted onsite water reuse. In this study, moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), membrane bioreactor (MBR), and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) treatment steps were integrated successively to obtain the combined advantages of these processes for industrial wastewater treatment. The MBBR step acts as the first step in the biological treatment and also mitigates foulant load on the MBR. Similarly, MBR acts as the second step in the biological treatment and serves as a pretreatment prior to the DCMD step. The latter acts as a final treatment to produce high-quality water. A laboratory scale integrated MBBR/MBR/DCMD experimental system was used for assessing the treatment efficiency of primary treated (PTIWW) and secondary treated (STIWW) industrial wastewater in terms of permeate water flux, effluent quality, and membrane fouling. The removal efficiency of total dissolved solids (TDS) and effluent permeate flux of the three-step process (MBBR/MBR/DCMD) were better than the two-step (MBR/DCMD) process. In the three-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 99.85% and 98.16% when treating STIWW and PTIWW, respectively. While in the case of the two-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 93.83% when treating STIWW. Similar trends were observed for effluent permeate flux values which were found, in the case of the three-step process, 62.6% higher than the two-step process, when treating STIWW in both cases. Moreover, the comparison of the quality of the effluents obtained with the analysed configurations with that obtained by Jeddah Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant proved the higher performance of the proposed membrane processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9863120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98631202023-01-22 Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater Alharthi, Mamdouh S. Bamaga, Omar Abulkhair, Hani Organji, Husam Shaiban, Amer Macedonio, Francesca Criscuoli, Alessandra Drioli, Enrico Wang, Zhaohui Cui, Zhaoliang Jin, Wanqin Albeirutty, Mohammed Membranes (Basel) Article Integrated wastewater treatment processes are accepted as the best option for sustainable and unrestricted onsite water reuse. In this study, moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), membrane bioreactor (MBR), and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) treatment steps were integrated successively to obtain the combined advantages of these processes for industrial wastewater treatment. The MBBR step acts as the first step in the biological treatment and also mitigates foulant load on the MBR. Similarly, MBR acts as the second step in the biological treatment and serves as a pretreatment prior to the DCMD step. The latter acts as a final treatment to produce high-quality water. A laboratory scale integrated MBBR/MBR/DCMD experimental system was used for assessing the treatment efficiency of primary treated (PTIWW) and secondary treated (STIWW) industrial wastewater in terms of permeate water flux, effluent quality, and membrane fouling. The removal efficiency of total dissolved solids (TDS) and effluent permeate flux of the three-step process (MBBR/MBR/DCMD) were better than the two-step (MBR/DCMD) process. In the three-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 99.85% and 98.16% when treating STIWW and PTIWW, respectively. While in the case of the two-step process, the average removal efficiency of TDS was 93.83% when treating STIWW. Similar trends were observed for effluent permeate flux values which were found, in the case of the three-step process, 62.6% higher than the two-step process, when treating STIWW in both cases. Moreover, the comparison of the quality of the effluents obtained with the analysed configurations with that obtained by Jeddah Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant proved the higher performance of the proposed membrane processes. MDPI 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9863120/ /pubmed/36676823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010016 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alharthi, Mamdouh S. Bamaga, Omar Abulkhair, Hani Organji, Husam Shaiban, Amer Macedonio, Francesca Criscuoli, Alessandra Drioli, Enrico Wang, Zhaohui Cui, Zhaoliang Jin, Wanqin Albeirutty, Mohammed Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title | Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title_full | Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title_short | Evaluation of a Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Membrane Bioreactor and a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation System for Purification of Industrial Wastewater |
title_sort | evaluation of a hybrid moving bed biofilm membrane bioreactor and a direct contact membrane distillation system for purification of industrial wastewater |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36676823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alharthimamdouhs evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT bamagaomar evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT abulkhairhani evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT organjihusam evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT shaibanamer evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT macedoniofrancesca evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT criscuolialessandra evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT driolienrico evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT wangzhaohui evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT cuizhaoliang evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT jinwanqin evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater AT albeiruttymohammed evaluationofahybridmovingbedbiofilmmembranebioreactorandadirectcontactmembranedistillationsystemforpurificationofindustrialwastewater |