Cargando…

Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment

(1) Background: Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ottestad, Anine Larsen, Huang, Mo, Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke, Mjelle, Robin, Skarpeteig, Veronica, Dai, Hong Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010042
_version_ 1784875258371637248
author Ottestad, Anine Larsen
Huang, Mo
Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke
Mjelle, Robin
Skarpeteig, Veronica
Dai, Hong Yan
author_facet Ottestad, Anine Larsen
Huang, Mo
Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke
Mjelle, Robin
Skarpeteig, Veronica
Dai, Hong Yan
author_sort Ottestad, Anine Larsen
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor mutation burden (TMB) assessment; (2) Methods: DNA from 19 diagnostic small cell lung cancer biopsies and an AcroMetrix™ assessment sample with >500 mutations were sequenced using Oncomine(™) Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCAP) on the Ion Torrent platform and TruSight Oncology 500 Assay (TSO500) on the Illumina platform; (3) Results: OCAP and TSO500 achieved comparable NGS quality, such as mean read coverage and mean coverage uniformity. A total of 100% of the variants in the diagnostic samples and 80% of the variants in the AcroMetrix™ assessment sample were detected by both panels, and the panels reported highly similar variant allele frequency. A proportion of 14/19 (74%) samples were classified in the same TMB category; (4) Conclusions: Comparable results were obtained using OCAP and TSO500, suggesting that both panels could be applied to screen patients for enrolment in personalized cancer treatment trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9863125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98631252023-01-22 Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment Ottestad, Anine Larsen Huang, Mo Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke Mjelle, Robin Skarpeteig, Veronica Dai, Hong Yan J Pers Med Article (1) Background: Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor mutation burden (TMB) assessment; (2) Methods: DNA from 19 diagnostic small cell lung cancer biopsies and an AcroMetrix™ assessment sample with >500 mutations were sequenced using Oncomine(™) Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCAP) on the Ion Torrent platform and TruSight Oncology 500 Assay (TSO500) on the Illumina platform; (3) Results: OCAP and TSO500 achieved comparable NGS quality, such as mean read coverage and mean coverage uniformity. A total of 100% of the variants in the diagnostic samples and 80% of the variants in the AcroMetrix™ assessment sample were detected by both panels, and the panels reported highly similar variant allele frequency. A proportion of 14/19 (74%) samples were classified in the same TMB category; (4) Conclusions: Comparable results were obtained using OCAP and TSO500, suggesting that both panels could be applied to screen patients for enrolment in personalized cancer treatment trials. MDPI 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9863125/ /pubmed/36675703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010042 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ottestad, Anine Larsen
Huang, Mo
Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke
Mjelle, Robin
Skarpeteig, Veronica
Dai, Hong Yan
Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title_full Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title_fullStr Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title_short Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment
title_sort assessment of two commercial comprehensive gene panels for personalized cancer treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010042
work_keys_str_mv AT ottestadaninelarsen assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment
AT huangmo assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment
AT emdalelisabethfritzke assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment
AT mjellerobin assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment
AT skarpeteigveronica assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment
AT daihongyan assessmentoftwocommercialcomprehensivegenepanelsforpersonalizedcancertreatment