Cargando…
Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053 |
_version_ | 1784875447178231808 |
---|---|
author | Yamakawa, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Norio Tomita, Yosuke Okuda, Ryuichiro Masada, Yasutaka Shiroshita, Akihiro Matsumoto, Toshiyuki |
author_facet | Yamakawa, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Norio Tomita, Yosuke Okuda, Ryuichiro Masada, Yasutaka Shiroshita, Akihiro Matsumoto, Toshiyuki |
author_sort | Yamakawa, Yasuaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.94) and 0.86 (0.82–0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9863890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98638902023-01-22 Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures Yamakawa, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Norio Tomita, Yosuke Okuda, Ryuichiro Masada, Yasutaka Shiroshita, Akihiro Matsumoto, Toshiyuki J Pers Med Article Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.94) and 0.86 (0.82–0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9863890/ /pubmed/36675714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yamakawa, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Norio Tomita, Yosuke Okuda, Ryuichiro Masada, Yasutaka Shiroshita, Akihiro Matsumoto, Toshiyuki Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title | Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title_full | Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title_fullStr | Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title_short | Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures |
title_sort | reliability of the garden alignment index and valgus tilt measurement for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamakawayasuaki reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT yamamotonorio reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT tomitayosuke reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT okudaryuichiro reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT masadayasutaka reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT shiroshitaakihiro reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT matsumototoshiyuki reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures |