Cargando…

Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamakawa, Yasuaki, Yamamoto, Norio, Tomita, Yosuke, Okuda, Ryuichiro, Masada, Yasutaka, Shiroshita, Akihiro, Matsumoto, Toshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053
_version_ 1784875447178231808
author Yamakawa, Yasuaki
Yamamoto, Norio
Tomita, Yosuke
Okuda, Ryuichiro
Masada, Yasutaka
Shiroshita, Akihiro
Matsumoto, Toshiyuki
author_facet Yamakawa, Yasuaki
Yamamoto, Norio
Tomita, Yosuke
Okuda, Ryuichiro
Masada, Yasutaka
Shiroshita, Akihiro
Matsumoto, Toshiyuki
author_sort Yamakawa, Yasuaki
collection PubMed
description Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.94) and 0.86 (0.82–0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9863890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98638902023-01-22 Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures Yamakawa, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Norio Tomita, Yosuke Okuda, Ryuichiro Masada, Yasutaka Shiroshita, Akihiro Matsumoto, Toshiyuki J Pers Med Article Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.94) and 0.86 (0.82–0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9863890/ /pubmed/36675714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yamakawa, Yasuaki
Yamamoto, Norio
Tomita, Yosuke
Okuda, Ryuichiro
Masada, Yasutaka
Shiroshita, Akihiro
Matsumoto, Toshiyuki
Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title_fullStr Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title_short Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures
title_sort reliability of the garden alignment index and valgus tilt measurement for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010053
work_keys_str_mv AT yamakawayasuaki reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT yamamotonorio reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT tomitayosuke reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT okudaryuichiro reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT masadayasutaka reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT shiroshitaakihiro reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT matsumototoshiyuki reliabilityofthegardenalignmentindexandvalgustiltmeasurementfornondisplacedfemoralneckfractures