Cargando…
Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies
Digital anthropometry (DA) has been recently developed for body composition evaluation and for postural analysis. The aims of this review are to examine the current state of DA technology, as well as to verify the methods for identifying the best technology to be used in the field of DA by evaluatin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9864001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020302 |
_version_ | 1784875474830229504 |
---|---|
author | Mocini, Edoardo Cammarota, Camillo Frigerio, Francesco Muzzioli, Luca Piciocchi, Claudia Lacalaprice, Doriana Buccolini, Fabio Donini, Lorenzo Maria Pinto, Alessandro |
author_facet | Mocini, Edoardo Cammarota, Camillo Frigerio, Francesco Muzzioli, Luca Piciocchi, Claudia Lacalaprice, Doriana Buccolini, Fabio Donini, Lorenzo Maria Pinto, Alessandro |
author_sort | Mocini, Edoardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital anthropometry (DA) has been recently developed for body composition evaluation and for postural analysis. The aims of this review are to examine the current state of DA technology, as well as to verify the methods for identifying the best technology to be used in the field of DA by evaluating the reliability and accuracy of the available technologies on the market, and lay the groundwork for future technological developments. A literature search was performed and 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The reliability and accuracy of DA was high in most studies, especially in the assessment of patients with obesity, although they varied according to the technology used; a good correlation was found between DA and conventional anthropometry (CA) and body composition estimates. DA is less time-consuming and less expensive and could be used as a screening tool before more expensive imaging techniques or as an alternative to other less affordable techniques. At present, DA could be useful in clinical practice, but the heterogeneity of the available studies (different devices used, laser technologies, population examined, etc.) necessitates caution in the interpretation of the obtained results. Furthermore, the need to develop integrated technologies for analyzing body composition according to multi-compartmental models is increasingly evident. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9864001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98640012023-01-22 Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies Mocini, Edoardo Cammarota, Camillo Frigerio, Francesco Muzzioli, Luca Piciocchi, Claudia Lacalaprice, Doriana Buccolini, Fabio Donini, Lorenzo Maria Pinto, Alessandro Nutrients Review Digital anthropometry (DA) has been recently developed for body composition evaluation and for postural analysis. The aims of this review are to examine the current state of DA technology, as well as to verify the methods for identifying the best technology to be used in the field of DA by evaluating the reliability and accuracy of the available technologies on the market, and lay the groundwork for future technological developments. A literature search was performed and 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The reliability and accuracy of DA was high in most studies, especially in the assessment of patients with obesity, although they varied according to the technology used; a good correlation was found between DA and conventional anthropometry (CA) and body composition estimates. DA is less time-consuming and less expensive and could be used as a screening tool before more expensive imaging techniques or as an alternative to other less affordable techniques. At present, DA could be useful in clinical practice, but the heterogeneity of the available studies (different devices used, laser technologies, population examined, etc.) necessitates caution in the interpretation of the obtained results. Furthermore, the need to develop integrated technologies for analyzing body composition according to multi-compartmental models is increasingly evident. MDPI 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9864001/ /pubmed/36678173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020302 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Mocini, Edoardo Cammarota, Camillo Frigerio, Francesco Muzzioli, Luca Piciocchi, Claudia Lacalaprice, Doriana Buccolini, Fabio Donini, Lorenzo Maria Pinto, Alessandro Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title | Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title_full | Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title_fullStr | Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title_short | Digital Anthropometry: A Systematic Review on Precision, Reliability and Accuracy of Most Popular Existing Technologies |
title_sort | digital anthropometry: a systematic review on precision, reliability and accuracy of most popular existing technologies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9864001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mociniedoardo digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT cammarotacamillo digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT frigeriofrancesco digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT muzzioliluca digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT piciocchiclaudia digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT lacalapricedoriana digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT buccolinifabio digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT doninilorenzomaria digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies AT pintoalessandro digitalanthropometryasystematicreviewonprecisionreliabilityandaccuracyofmostpopularexistingtechnologies |