Cargando…

Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †

Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaslansky, Ruth, Baumbach, Philipp, Edry, Ruth, Chetty, Sean, Min, Lim Siu, Schaub, Isabelle, Cruz, Jorge Jimenez, Meissner, Winfried, Stamer, Ulrike M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9864952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020676
_version_ 1784875714781118464
author Zaslansky, Ruth
Baumbach, Philipp
Edry, Ruth
Chetty, Sean
Min, Lim Siu
Schaub, Isabelle
Cruz, Jorge Jimenez
Meissner, Winfried
Stamer, Ulrike M.
author_facet Zaslansky, Ruth
Baumbach, Philipp
Edry, Ruth
Chetty, Sean
Min, Lim Siu
Schaub, Isabelle
Cruz, Jorge Jimenez
Meissner, Winfried
Stamer, Ulrike M.
author_sort Zaslansky, Ruth
collection PubMed
description Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= “full”); otherwise, it was “incomplete”. A “Pain Composite Score-total” (PCS(total)), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. “Full” care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCS(total) was significantly lower compared to “incomplete” care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9864952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98649522023-01-22 Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data † Zaslansky, Ruth Baumbach, Philipp Edry, Ruth Chetty, Sean Min, Lim Siu Schaub, Isabelle Cruz, Jorge Jimenez Meissner, Winfried Stamer, Ulrike M. J Clin Med Article Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= “full”); otherwise, it was “incomplete”. A “Pain Composite Score-total” (PCS(total)), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. “Full” care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCS(total) was significantly lower compared to “incomplete” care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn. MDPI 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9864952/ /pubmed/36675605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020676 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zaslansky, Ruth
Baumbach, Philipp
Edry, Ruth
Chetty, Sean
Min, Lim Siu
Schaub, Isabelle
Cruz, Jorge Jimenez
Meissner, Winfried
Stamer, Ulrike M.
Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title_full Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title_fullStr Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title_full_unstemmed Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title_short Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data †
title_sort following evidence-based recommendations for perioperative pain management after cesarean section is associated with better pain-related outcomes: analysis of registry data †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9864952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020676
work_keys_str_mv AT zaslanskyruth followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT baumbachphilipp followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT edryruth followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT chettysean followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT minlimsiu followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT schaubisabelle followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT cruzjorgejimenez followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT meissnerwinfried followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata
AT stamerulrikem followingevidencebasedrecommendationsforperioperativepainmanagementaftercesareansectionisassociatedwithbetterpainrelatedoutcomesanalysisofregistrydata