Cargando…

Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor

Background: With the increase in concern for deaths and illness related to the increase in temperature globally, there is a growing need for real-time monitoring of workers for heat stress indicators. The purpose of this study was to determine the usability of the Slate Safety (SS) wearable physiolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callihan, Michael, Cole, Heather, Stokley, Holly, Gunter, Joshua, Clamp, Kaitlyn, Martin, Alexis, Doherty, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020877
_version_ 1784875758716452864
author Callihan, Michael
Cole, Heather
Stokley, Holly
Gunter, Joshua
Clamp, Kaitlyn
Martin, Alexis
Doherty, Hannah
author_facet Callihan, Michael
Cole, Heather
Stokley, Holly
Gunter, Joshua
Clamp, Kaitlyn
Martin, Alexis
Doherty, Hannah
author_sort Callihan, Michael
collection PubMed
description Background: With the increase in concern for deaths and illness related to the increase in temperature globally, there is a growing need for real-time monitoring of workers for heat stress indicators. The purpose of this study was to determine the usability of the Slate Safety (SS) wearable physiological monitoring system. Methods: Twenty nurses performed a common task in a moderate or hot environment while wearing the SS device, the Polar 10 monitor, and having taken the e-Celsius ingestible pill. Data from each device was compared for correlation and accuracy. Results: High correlation was determined between the SS wearable device and the Polar 10 system (0.926) and the ingestible pill (0.595). The SS was comfortable to wear and easily monitored multiple participants from a distance. Conclusions: The Slate Safety wearable device demonstrated accuracy in measuring core temperature and heart rate while not restricting the motion of the worker, and provided a remote monitoring platform for physiological parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9865127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98651272023-01-22 Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor Callihan, Michael Cole, Heather Stokley, Holly Gunter, Joshua Clamp, Kaitlyn Martin, Alexis Doherty, Hannah Sensors (Basel) Article Background: With the increase in concern for deaths and illness related to the increase in temperature globally, there is a growing need for real-time monitoring of workers for heat stress indicators. The purpose of this study was to determine the usability of the Slate Safety (SS) wearable physiological monitoring system. Methods: Twenty nurses performed a common task in a moderate or hot environment while wearing the SS device, the Polar 10 monitor, and having taken the e-Celsius ingestible pill. Data from each device was compared for correlation and accuracy. Results: High correlation was determined between the SS wearable device and the Polar 10 system (0.926) and the ingestible pill (0.595). The SS was comfortable to wear and easily monitored multiple participants from a distance. Conclusions: The Slate Safety wearable device demonstrated accuracy in measuring core temperature and heart rate while not restricting the motion of the worker, and provided a remote monitoring platform for physiological parameters. MDPI 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9865127/ /pubmed/36679676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020877 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Callihan, Michael
Cole, Heather
Stokley, Holly
Gunter, Joshua
Clamp, Kaitlyn
Martin, Alexis
Doherty, Hannah
Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title_full Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title_fullStr Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title_short Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
title_sort comparison of slate safety wearable device to ingestible pill and wearable heart rate monitor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23020877
work_keys_str_mv AT callihanmichael comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT coleheather comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT stokleyholly comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT gunterjoshua comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT clampkaitlyn comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT martinalexis comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor
AT dohertyhannah comparisonofslatesafetywearabledevicetoingestiblepillandwearableheartratemonitor