Cargando…

Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The mammalian uterus has been shown to host a range of microorganisms with or without potential pathogenic capacity. In camels, microorganisms from infertile subjects have been isolated using various sampling methodologies, but not much is known about the range of expected microbes t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asadi, Behnam, Seyedasgari, Fahimeh, Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj, Yarmohammadi, Mehdi, Ebadi, Reza, Kim, Ellen, Barin, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010039
_version_ 1784875769833455616
author Asadi, Behnam
Seyedasgari, Fahimeh
Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj
Yarmohammadi, Mehdi
Ebadi, Reza
Kim, Ellen
Barin, Abbas
author_facet Asadi, Behnam
Seyedasgari, Fahimeh
Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj
Yarmohammadi, Mehdi
Ebadi, Reza
Kim, Ellen
Barin, Abbas
author_sort Asadi, Behnam
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The mammalian uterus has been shown to host a range of microorganisms with or without potential pathogenic capacity. In camels, microorganisms from infertile subjects have been isolated using various sampling methodologies, but not much is known about the range of expected microbes that can be harbored in the uteri of camels without a complicated reproductive performance. The current results indicated up to 66% of camels yield bacteria from uterine samples with a higher frequency among sub-fertile subjects; yet, uterine bacterial burden does not necessarily indicate uterine pathology in otherwise reproductively asymptomatic animals. The application of small-volume lavage for uterine sampling might change our understanding about the range of uterine isolates in camels. ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9865171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98651712023-01-22 Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance Asadi, Behnam Seyedasgari, Fahimeh Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj Yarmohammadi, Mehdi Ebadi, Reza Kim, Ellen Barin, Abbas Vet Sci Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The mammalian uterus has been shown to host a range of microorganisms with or without potential pathogenic capacity. In camels, microorganisms from infertile subjects have been isolated using various sampling methodologies, but not much is known about the range of expected microbes that can be harbored in the uteri of camels without a complicated reproductive performance. The current results indicated up to 66% of camels yield bacteria from uterine samples with a higher frequency among sub-fertile subjects; yet, uterine bacterial burden does not necessarily indicate uterine pathology in otherwise reproductively asymptomatic animals. The application of small-volume lavage for uterine sampling might change our understanding about the range of uterine isolates in camels. ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria. MDPI 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9865171/ /pubmed/36669039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010039 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Asadi, Behnam
Seyedasgari, Fahimeh
Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj
Yarmohammadi, Mehdi
Ebadi, Reza
Kim, Ellen
Barin, Abbas
Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title_full Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title_fullStr Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title_full_unstemmed Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title_short Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
title_sort isolated bacteria from the uteri of camels with different reproductive backgrounds: a study on sampling methodology, prevalence, and clinical significance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010039
work_keys_str_mv AT asadibehnam isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT seyedasgarifahimeh isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT ashrafitamaiiradj isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT yarmohammadimehdi isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT ebadireza isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT kimellen isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance
AT barinabbas isolatedbacteriafromtheuteriofcamelswithdifferentreproductivebackgroundsastudyonsamplingmethodologyprevalenceandclinicalsignificance