Cargando…
Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605 |
_version_ | 1784875781816582144 |
---|---|
author | Guevara, Nicolas Truy, Eric Hoen, Michel Hermann, Ruben Vandersteen, Clair Gallego, Stéphane |
author_facet | Guevara, Nicolas Truy, Eric Hoen, Michel Hermann, Ruben Vandersteen, Clair Gallego, Stéphane |
author_sort | Guevara, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three stimulation configurations: (1) single electrode stimulations (E11 or E13); (2) simultaneous stimulation from two electrodes separated by one (E(n) and E(n+2), E11 and E13); and (3) stimulations from three consecutive electrodes (E11, E12, and E13). Stimulation level was kept constant at 70% electrical dynamic range (EDR) on the two flanking electrodes (E11 and E13) and was varied from 0 to 100% EDR on the middle electrode (E12). We hypothesized that increasing the middle electrode stimulation level would cause increasing local electrical interactions, reflected in characteristics of the evoked compound eABR. Results show that group averaged eABR wave III and V latency and amplitude were reduced when stimulation level at the middle electrode was increased, in particular when stimulation level on E12 reached 40, 70, and 100% EDR. Compound eABRs can provide a detailed individual quantification of electrical interactions occurring at specific electrodes along the CI electrode array. This approach allows a fine determination of interactions at the single electrode level potentially informing audiological decisions regarding mapping of CI systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9865217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98652172023-01-22 Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users Guevara, Nicolas Truy, Eric Hoen, Michel Hermann, Ruben Vandersteen, Clair Gallego, Stéphane J Clin Med Article The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three stimulation configurations: (1) single electrode stimulations (E11 or E13); (2) simultaneous stimulation from two electrodes separated by one (E(n) and E(n+2), E11 and E13); and (3) stimulations from three consecutive electrodes (E11, E12, and E13). Stimulation level was kept constant at 70% electrical dynamic range (EDR) on the two flanking electrodes (E11 and E13) and was varied from 0 to 100% EDR on the middle electrode (E12). We hypothesized that increasing the middle electrode stimulation level would cause increasing local electrical interactions, reflected in characteristics of the evoked compound eABR. Results show that group averaged eABR wave III and V latency and amplitude were reduced when stimulation level at the middle electrode was increased, in particular when stimulation level on E12 reached 40, 70, and 100% EDR. Compound eABRs can provide a detailed individual quantification of electrical interactions occurring at specific electrodes along the CI electrode array. This approach allows a fine determination of interactions at the single electrode level potentially informing audiological decisions regarding mapping of CI systems. MDPI 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9865217/ /pubmed/36675534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guevara, Nicolas Truy, Eric Hoen, Michel Hermann, Ruben Vandersteen, Clair Gallego, Stéphane Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title | Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full | Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_fullStr | Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_short | Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_sort | electrical field interactions during adjacent electrode stimulations: eabr evaluation in cochlear implant users |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guevaranicolas electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers AT truyeric electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers AT hoenmichel electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers AT hermannruben electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers AT vandersteenclair electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers AT gallegostephane electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers |