Cargando…

Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users

The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guevara, Nicolas, Truy, Eric, Hoen, Michel, Hermann, Ruben, Vandersteen, Clair, Gallego, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605
_version_ 1784875781816582144
author Guevara, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Hoen, Michel
Hermann, Ruben
Vandersteen, Clair
Gallego, Stéphane
author_facet Guevara, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Hoen, Michel
Hermann, Ruben
Vandersteen, Clair
Gallego, Stéphane
author_sort Guevara, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three stimulation configurations: (1) single electrode stimulations (E11 or E13); (2) simultaneous stimulation from two electrodes separated by one (E(n) and E(n+2), E11 and E13); and (3) stimulations from three consecutive electrodes (E11, E12, and E13). Stimulation level was kept constant at 70% electrical dynamic range (EDR) on the two flanking electrodes (E11 and E13) and was varied from 0 to 100% EDR on the middle electrode (E12). We hypothesized that increasing the middle electrode stimulation level would cause increasing local electrical interactions, reflected in characteristics of the evoked compound eABR. Results show that group averaged eABR wave III and V latency and amplitude were reduced when stimulation level at the middle electrode was increased, in particular when stimulation level on E12 reached 40, 70, and 100% EDR. Compound eABRs can provide a detailed individual quantification of electrical interactions occurring at specific electrodes along the CI electrode array. This approach allows a fine determination of interactions at the single electrode level potentially informing audiological decisions regarding mapping of CI systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9865217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98652172023-01-22 Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users Guevara, Nicolas Truy, Eric Hoen, Michel Hermann, Ruben Vandersteen, Clair Gallego, Stéphane J Clin Med Article The present study investigates how electrically evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) can be used to measure local channel interactions along cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. eABRs were recorded from 16 experienced CI patients in response to electrical pulse trains delivered using three stimulation configurations: (1) single electrode stimulations (E11 or E13); (2) simultaneous stimulation from two electrodes separated by one (E(n) and E(n+2), E11 and E13); and (3) stimulations from three consecutive electrodes (E11, E12, and E13). Stimulation level was kept constant at 70% electrical dynamic range (EDR) on the two flanking electrodes (E11 and E13) and was varied from 0 to 100% EDR on the middle electrode (E12). We hypothesized that increasing the middle electrode stimulation level would cause increasing local electrical interactions, reflected in characteristics of the evoked compound eABR. Results show that group averaged eABR wave III and V latency and amplitude were reduced when stimulation level at the middle electrode was increased, in particular when stimulation level on E12 reached 40, 70, and 100% EDR. Compound eABRs can provide a detailed individual quantification of electrical interactions occurring at specific electrodes along the CI electrode array. This approach allows a fine determination of interactions at the single electrode level potentially informing audiological decisions regarding mapping of CI systems. MDPI 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9865217/ /pubmed/36675534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guevara, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Hoen, Michel
Hermann, Ruben
Vandersteen, Clair
Gallego, Stéphane
Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort electrical field interactions during adjacent electrode stimulations: eabr evaluation in cochlear implant users
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020605
work_keys_str_mv AT guevaranicolas electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers
AT truyeric electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers
AT hoenmichel electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers
AT hermannruben electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers
AT vandersteenclair electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers
AT gallegostephane electricalfieldinteractionsduringadjacentelectrodestimulationseabrevaluationincochlearimplantusers