Cargando…

Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Fang, Chen, Kelie, Zhong, Jiamin, Tang, Song, Xu, Sinan, Lu, Weiguo, Wu, Yihua, Xia, Dajing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403
_version_ 1784875898473807872
author Zheng, Fang
Chen, Kelie
Zhong, Jiamin
Tang, Song
Xu, Sinan
Lu, Weiguo
Wu, Yihua
Xia, Dajing
author_facet Zheng, Fang
Chen, Kelie
Zhong, Jiamin
Tang, Song
Xu, Sinan
Lu, Weiguo
Wu, Yihua
Xia, Dajing
author_sort Zheng, Fang
collection PubMed
description Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature from 1 January 1960 to 26 December 2022 to investigate the association between tea intake and gynecologic cancer risk. In total, 19 cohort studies with 2,020,980 subjects and 12,155 gynecological tumor cases were retrieved. The pooled relative risk (RR) of gynecologic tumor for tea intake was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96–1.04). RRs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–1.01) for ovarian cancer, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97–1.07) for endometrial cancer, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91–1.23) for cervical cancer. Subgroup analyses were adopted based on the tea type and geographic location. Interestingly, significant preventive impact of non-herbal tea on ovarian cancer (pooled relative risk: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.81) was found, especially for black tea (pooled relative risk: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51–0.80). Dose–response analysis indicated that although it is not statistically significant, a decreasing trend of ovarian cancer risk could be observed when the tea consumption was 1.40 to 3.12 cups/day. In conclusion, our findings suggested that ovarian cancer, but not other gynecologic cancers, could possibly be prevented by drinking non-herbal tea. In addition, the preventive impact of green tea on gynecologic cancer seemed to be relatively weak and needs further cohorts to validate it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9865679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98656792023-01-22 Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Zheng, Fang Chen, Kelie Zhong, Jiamin Tang, Song Xu, Sinan Lu, Weiguo Wu, Yihua Xia, Dajing Nutrients Article Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature from 1 January 1960 to 26 December 2022 to investigate the association between tea intake and gynecologic cancer risk. In total, 19 cohort studies with 2,020,980 subjects and 12,155 gynecological tumor cases were retrieved. The pooled relative risk (RR) of gynecologic tumor for tea intake was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96–1.04). RRs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–1.01) for ovarian cancer, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97–1.07) for endometrial cancer, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91–1.23) for cervical cancer. Subgroup analyses were adopted based on the tea type and geographic location. Interestingly, significant preventive impact of non-herbal tea on ovarian cancer (pooled relative risk: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.81) was found, especially for black tea (pooled relative risk: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51–0.80). Dose–response analysis indicated that although it is not statistically significant, a decreasing trend of ovarian cancer risk could be observed when the tea consumption was 1.40 to 3.12 cups/day. In conclusion, our findings suggested that ovarian cancer, but not other gynecologic cancers, could possibly be prevented by drinking non-herbal tea. In addition, the preventive impact of green tea on gynecologic cancer seemed to be relatively weak and needs further cohorts to validate it. MDPI 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9865679/ /pubmed/36678274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zheng, Fang
Chen, Kelie
Zhong, Jiamin
Tang, Song
Xu, Sinan
Lu, Weiguo
Wu, Yihua
Xia, Dajing
Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_fullStr Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full_unstemmed Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_short Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_sort association between different types of tea consumption and risk of gynecologic cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengfang associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT chenkelie associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhongjiamin associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT tangsong associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT xusinan associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT luweiguo associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT wuyihua associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT xiadajing associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies