Cargando…
Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403 |
_version_ | 1784875898473807872 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Fang Chen, Kelie Zhong, Jiamin Tang, Song Xu, Sinan Lu, Weiguo Wu, Yihua Xia, Dajing |
author_facet | Zheng, Fang Chen, Kelie Zhong, Jiamin Tang, Song Xu, Sinan Lu, Weiguo Wu, Yihua Xia, Dajing |
author_sort | Zheng, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature from 1 January 1960 to 26 December 2022 to investigate the association between tea intake and gynecologic cancer risk. In total, 19 cohort studies with 2,020,980 subjects and 12,155 gynecological tumor cases were retrieved. The pooled relative risk (RR) of gynecologic tumor for tea intake was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96–1.04). RRs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–1.01) for ovarian cancer, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97–1.07) for endometrial cancer, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91–1.23) for cervical cancer. Subgroup analyses were adopted based on the tea type and geographic location. Interestingly, significant preventive impact of non-herbal tea on ovarian cancer (pooled relative risk: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.81) was found, especially for black tea (pooled relative risk: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51–0.80). Dose–response analysis indicated that although it is not statistically significant, a decreasing trend of ovarian cancer risk could be observed when the tea consumption was 1.40 to 3.12 cups/day. In conclusion, our findings suggested that ovarian cancer, but not other gynecologic cancers, could possibly be prevented by drinking non-herbal tea. In addition, the preventive impact of green tea on gynecologic cancer seemed to be relatively weak and needs further cohorts to validate it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9865679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98656792023-01-22 Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Zheng, Fang Chen, Kelie Zhong, Jiamin Tang, Song Xu, Sinan Lu, Weiguo Wu, Yihua Xia, Dajing Nutrients Article Plenty of studies have shown that tea has an effect of inhibiting gynecologic tumors. However, there still remained controversy of the association between tea and gynecologic tumors in epidemiological studies. In this study, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were used to search the literature from 1 January 1960 to 26 December 2022 to investigate the association between tea intake and gynecologic cancer risk. In total, 19 cohort studies with 2,020,980 subjects and 12,155 gynecological tumor cases were retrieved. The pooled relative risk (RR) of gynecologic tumor for tea intake was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96–1.04). RRs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–1.01) for ovarian cancer, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97–1.07) for endometrial cancer, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91–1.23) for cervical cancer. Subgroup analyses were adopted based on the tea type and geographic location. Interestingly, significant preventive impact of non-herbal tea on ovarian cancer (pooled relative risk: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.81) was found, especially for black tea (pooled relative risk: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51–0.80). Dose–response analysis indicated that although it is not statistically significant, a decreasing trend of ovarian cancer risk could be observed when the tea consumption was 1.40 to 3.12 cups/day. In conclusion, our findings suggested that ovarian cancer, but not other gynecologic cancers, could possibly be prevented by drinking non-herbal tea. In addition, the preventive impact of green tea on gynecologic cancer seemed to be relatively weak and needs further cohorts to validate it. MDPI 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9865679/ /pubmed/36678274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zheng, Fang Chen, Kelie Zhong, Jiamin Tang, Song Xu, Sinan Lu, Weiguo Wu, Yihua Xia, Dajing Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title | Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title_full | Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title_fullStr | Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title_short | Association between Different Types of Tea Consumption and Risk of Gynecologic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies |
title_sort | association between different types of tea consumption and risk of gynecologic cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9865679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengfang associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT chenkelie associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT zhongjiamin associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT tangsong associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT xusinan associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT luweiguo associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT wuyihua associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies AT xiadajing associationbetweendifferenttypesofteaconsumptionandriskofgynecologiccancerametaanalysisofcohortstudies |