Cargando…

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron with that of ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyo Jin, Ahn, EunJin, Choi, Geun Joo, Kang, Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010082
_version_ 1784876091403403264
author Kim, Hyo Jin
Ahn, EunJin
Choi, Geun Joo
Kang, Hyun
author_facet Kim, Hyo Jin
Ahn, EunJin
Choi, Geun Joo
Kang, Hyun
author_sort Kim, Hyo Jin
collection PubMed
description This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron with that of ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron to that of ramosetron for preventing PONV were included. The primary outcomes were the incidences of postoperative nausea (PON), postoperative vomiting (POV), and PONV, which were measured in early, late, and overall phases. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the administration time of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and divided into two phases: early phase and the end of surgery. A total of 17 studies with 1823 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of retching (relative risk [RR] = 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.390 to 0.707) and late POV (RR = 0.604; 95% CI = 0.404 to 0.903) was significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ramosetron group. No significant differences were demonstrated in the incidence of PON, PONV, complete response, use of antiemetics, and adverse effects. Subgroup analysis showed that palonosetron was superior to ramosetron in terms of early PON, late PON, overall POV, and use of rescue antiemetics when they were administered early; in terms of retching, regardless of the timing of administration. Ramosetron was superior to palonosetron in terms of early PON when they were administered late. The prophylactic administration of palonosetron was more effective than that of ramosetron in preventing the development of retching and late POV. In this meta-analysis, no significant differences in PONV prevention between the two drugs were demonstrated. Further studies are required to validate the outcomes of our study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9866437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98664372023-01-22 Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis Kim, Hyo Jin Ahn, EunJin Choi, Geun Joo Kang, Hyun J Pers Med Systematic Review This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron with that of ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron to that of ramosetron for preventing PONV were included. The primary outcomes were the incidences of postoperative nausea (PON), postoperative vomiting (POV), and PONV, which were measured in early, late, and overall phases. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the administration time of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and divided into two phases: early phase and the end of surgery. A total of 17 studies with 1823 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of retching (relative risk [RR] = 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.390 to 0.707) and late POV (RR = 0.604; 95% CI = 0.404 to 0.903) was significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ramosetron group. No significant differences were demonstrated in the incidence of PON, PONV, complete response, use of antiemetics, and adverse effects. Subgroup analysis showed that palonosetron was superior to ramosetron in terms of early PON, late PON, overall POV, and use of rescue antiemetics when they were administered early; in terms of retching, regardless of the timing of administration. Ramosetron was superior to palonosetron in terms of early PON when they were administered late. The prophylactic administration of palonosetron was more effective than that of ramosetron in preventing the development of retching and late POV. In this meta-analysis, no significant differences in PONV prevention between the two drugs were demonstrated. Further studies are required to validate the outcomes of our study. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9866437/ /pubmed/36675743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010082 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kim, Hyo Jin
Ahn, EunJin
Choi, Geun Joo
Kang, Hyun
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title_short Comparison of the Effectiveness of Palonosetron and Ramosetron in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of palonosetron and ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675743
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010082
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyojin comparisonoftheeffectivenessofpalonosetronandramosetroninpreventingpostoperativenauseaandvomitingupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT ahneunjin comparisonoftheeffectivenessofpalonosetronandramosetroninpreventingpostoperativenauseaandvomitingupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT choigeunjoo comparisonoftheeffectivenessofpalonosetronandramosetroninpreventingpostoperativenauseaandvomitingupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT kanghyun comparisonoftheeffectivenessofpalonosetronandramosetroninpreventingpostoperativenauseaandvomitingupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis