Cargando…
Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369 |
_version_ | 1784876109745094656 |
---|---|
author | Neijhoft, Jonas Henrich, Dirk Kammerer, Andreas Janko, Maren Frank, Johannes Marzi, Ingo |
author_facet | Neijhoft, Jonas Henrich, Dirk Kammerer, Andreas Janko, Maren Frank, Johannes Marzi, Ingo |
author_sort | Neijhoft, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printed parts and if the printer itself could be seen as an inherent sterilization method. In a first step, an investigation was performed on the deformation of cylindrically shaped test parts after running them through the autoclaving process. Furthermore, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printing process itself were evaluated using culture medium sterility tests. It could be shown that, depending on the needed accuracy, parts down to a diameter of 5–10 mm can still be sterilized using autoclaving, while finer parts suffer from major deformations. For these, inherent sterilization of the printer itself is an option. During the printing process, over a certain contact time, heat at a higher level than that used in autoclaving is applied to the printed parts. The contact time, depending on the printing parameters, is calculated using the established formula. The results show that for stronger parts, autoclaving offers a cheap and good option for sterilization after FFF-printing. However, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printer itself can be considered, especially when printing with small layer heights for finer parts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9866509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98665092023-01-22 Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation Neijhoft, Jonas Henrich, Dirk Kammerer, Andreas Janko, Maren Frank, Johannes Marzi, Ingo Polymers (Basel) Article Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printed parts and if the printer itself could be seen as an inherent sterilization method. In a first step, an investigation was performed on the deformation of cylindrically shaped test parts after running them through the autoclaving process. Furthermore, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printing process itself were evaluated using culture medium sterility tests. It could be shown that, depending on the needed accuracy, parts down to a diameter of 5–10 mm can still be sterilized using autoclaving, while finer parts suffer from major deformations. For these, inherent sterilization of the printer itself is an option. During the printing process, over a certain contact time, heat at a higher level than that used in autoclaving is applied to the printed parts. The contact time, depending on the printing parameters, is calculated using the established formula. The results show that for stronger parts, autoclaving offers a cheap and good option for sterilization after FFF-printing. However, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printer itself can be considered, especially when printing with small layer heights for finer parts. MDPI 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9866509/ /pubmed/36679249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Neijhoft, Jonas Henrich, Dirk Kammerer, Andreas Janko, Maren Frank, Johannes Marzi, Ingo Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title | Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title_full | Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title_fullStr | Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title_short | Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation |
title_sort | sterilization of pla after fused filament fabrication 3d printing: evaluation on inherent sterility and the impossibility of autoclavation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neijhoftjonas sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation AT henrichdirk sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation AT kammererandreas sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation AT jankomaren sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation AT frankjohannes sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation AT marziingo sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation |