Cargando…

Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation

Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neijhoft, Jonas, Henrich, Dirk, Kammerer, Andreas, Janko, Maren, Frank, Johannes, Marzi, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369
_version_ 1784876109745094656
author Neijhoft, Jonas
Henrich, Dirk
Kammerer, Andreas
Janko, Maren
Frank, Johannes
Marzi, Ingo
author_facet Neijhoft, Jonas
Henrich, Dirk
Kammerer, Andreas
Janko, Maren
Frank, Johannes
Marzi, Ingo
author_sort Neijhoft, Jonas
collection PubMed
description Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printed parts and if the printer itself could be seen as an inherent sterilization method. In a first step, an investigation was performed on the deformation of cylindrically shaped test parts after running them through the autoclaving process. Furthermore, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printing process itself were evaluated using culture medium sterility tests. It could be shown that, depending on the needed accuracy, parts down to a diameter of 5–10 mm can still be sterilized using autoclaving, while finer parts suffer from major deformations. For these, inherent sterilization of the printer itself is an option. During the printing process, over a certain contact time, heat at a higher level than that used in autoclaving is applied to the printed parts. The contact time, depending on the printing parameters, is calculated using the established formula. The results show that for stronger parts, autoclaving offers a cheap and good option for sterilization after FFF-printing. However, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printer itself can be considered, especially when printing with small layer heights for finer parts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9866509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98665092023-01-22 Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation Neijhoft, Jonas Henrich, Dirk Kammerer, Andreas Janko, Maren Frank, Johannes Marzi, Ingo Polymers (Basel) Article Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printed parts and if the printer itself could be seen as an inherent sterilization method. In a first step, an investigation was performed on the deformation of cylindrically shaped test parts after running them through the autoclaving process. Furthermore, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printing process itself were evaluated using culture medium sterility tests. It could be shown that, depending on the needed accuracy, parts down to a diameter of 5–10 mm can still be sterilized using autoclaving, while finer parts suffer from major deformations. For these, inherent sterilization of the printer itself is an option. During the printing process, over a certain contact time, heat at a higher level than that used in autoclaving is applied to the printed parts. The contact time, depending on the printing parameters, is calculated using the established formula. The results show that for stronger parts, autoclaving offers a cheap and good option for sterilization after FFF-printing. However, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printer itself can be considered, especially when printing with small layer heights for finer parts. MDPI 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9866509/ /pubmed/36679249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Neijhoft, Jonas
Henrich, Dirk
Kammerer, Andreas
Janko, Maren
Frank, Johannes
Marzi, Ingo
Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title_full Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title_fullStr Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title_full_unstemmed Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title_short Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation
title_sort sterilization of pla after fused filament fabrication 3d printing: evaluation on inherent sterility and the impossibility of autoclavation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36679249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15020369
work_keys_str_mv AT neijhoftjonas sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation
AT henrichdirk sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation
AT kammererandreas sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation
AT jankomaren sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation
AT frankjohannes sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation
AT marziingo sterilizationofplaafterfusedfilamentfabrication3dprintingevaluationoninherentsterilityandtheimpossibilityofautoclavation