Cargando…

Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciolli, Gianluca, Mesnard, Guillaume, Deroche, Etienne, Gunst, Stanislas, Batailler, Cécile, Servien, Elvire, Lustig, Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081
_version_ 1784876271949316096
author Ciolli, Gianluca
Mesnard, Guillaume
Deroche, Etienne
Gunst, Stanislas
Batailler, Cécile
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
author_facet Ciolli, Gianluca
Mesnard, Guillaume
Deroche, Etienne
Gunst, Stanislas
Batailler, Cécile
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
author_sort Ciolli, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords “Cemented Dual Mobility Cup” or “Cemented Tripolar Cup” without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12–98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9867154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98671542023-01-22 Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Ciolli, Gianluca Mesnard, Guillaume Deroche, Etienne Gunst, Stanislas Batailler, Cécile Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien J Pers Med Systematic Review Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords “Cemented Dual Mobility Cup” or “Cemented Tripolar Cup” without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12–98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9867154/ /pubmed/36675742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ciolli, Gianluca
Mesnard, Guillaume
Deroche, Etienne
Gunst, Stanislas
Batailler, Cécile
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_short Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_sort is cemented dual-mobility cup a reliable option in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675742
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081
work_keys_str_mv AT ciolligianluca iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT mesnardguillaume iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT derocheetienne iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT gunststanislas iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT bataillercecile iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT servienelvire iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview
AT lustigsebastien iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview