Cargando…
Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081 |
_version_ | 1784876271949316096 |
---|---|
author | Ciolli, Gianluca Mesnard, Guillaume Deroche, Etienne Gunst, Stanislas Batailler, Cécile Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien |
author_facet | Ciolli, Gianluca Mesnard, Guillaume Deroche, Etienne Gunst, Stanislas Batailler, Cécile Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien |
author_sort | Ciolli, Gianluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords “Cemented Dual Mobility Cup” or “Cemented Tripolar Cup” without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12–98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98671542023-01-22 Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Ciolli, Gianluca Mesnard, Guillaume Deroche, Etienne Gunst, Stanislas Batailler, Cécile Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien J Pers Med Systematic Review Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords “Cemented Dual Mobility Cup” or “Cemented Tripolar Cup” without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12–98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9867154/ /pubmed/36675742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ciolli, Gianluca Mesnard, Guillaume Deroche, Etienne Gunst, Stanislas Batailler, Cécile Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title | Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | is cemented dual-mobility cup a reliable option in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciolligianluca iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT mesnardguillaume iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT derocheetienne iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT gunststanislas iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT bataillercecile iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT servienelvire iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview AT lustigsebastien iscementeddualmobilitycupareliableoptioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreview |