Cargando…
Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617 |
_version_ | 1784876312725291008 |
---|---|
author | Manos, Thierry Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Zulian, Viola Danan, Marc Vilallonga, Ramon Carandina, Sergio Nedelcu, Marius |
author_facet | Manos, Thierry Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Zulian, Viola Danan, Marc Vilallonga, Ramon Carandina, Sergio Nedelcu, Marius |
author_sort | Manos, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any additional trauma to the gastric wall already damaged by the migration. The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of endoscopic management for intraluminal gastric band erosion following LAGB. Methods: From January 2009–December 2020, a total of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed after undergoing endoscopic gastric band removal. The study included all consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic gastric band removal in this period. No patients were excluded from the study. Data on patient demographic characteristics, case history, operative details (procedural time, adverse events), and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent endoscopic gastric band removal: 22 women (75.8%) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 28–63) and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31 ± 4.7 kg/m(2) (range: 24–41). The average time to the identification of erosion after LAGB was 42 months (range: 28–137). The initial upper endoscopy found a migrated band of more than half of the diameter in 21 cases, less than a half but more than a third in seven cases and in one case, less than a third (use of a stent). Twenty-seven patients were successfully treated with endoscopic removal, and in two cases, the endoscopic approach failed, and laparoscopy was further performed. Conclusions: The endoscopic management of intraluminal erosion after LAGB can be safe and effective and should be considered the procedure of choice when treating this complication. The percentage of the band migration is important for the timing of the endoscopic removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98673192023-01-22 Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal Manos, Thierry Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Zulian, Viola Danan, Marc Vilallonga, Ramon Carandina, Sergio Nedelcu, Marius J Clin Med Article Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any additional trauma to the gastric wall already damaged by the migration. The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of endoscopic management for intraluminal gastric band erosion following LAGB. Methods: From January 2009–December 2020, a total of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed after undergoing endoscopic gastric band removal. The study included all consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic gastric band removal in this period. No patients were excluded from the study. Data on patient demographic characteristics, case history, operative details (procedural time, adverse events), and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent endoscopic gastric band removal: 22 women (75.8%) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 28–63) and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31 ± 4.7 kg/m(2) (range: 24–41). The average time to the identification of erosion after LAGB was 42 months (range: 28–137). The initial upper endoscopy found a migrated band of more than half of the diameter in 21 cases, less than a half but more than a third in seven cases and in one case, less than a third (use of a stent). Twenty-seven patients were successfully treated with endoscopic removal, and in two cases, the endoscopic approach failed, and laparoscopy was further performed. Conclusions: The endoscopic management of intraluminal erosion after LAGB can be safe and effective and should be considered the procedure of choice when treating this complication. The percentage of the band migration is important for the timing of the endoscopic removal. MDPI 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9867319/ /pubmed/36675548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Manos, Thierry Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Zulian, Viola Danan, Marc Vilallonga, Ramon Carandina, Sergio Nedelcu, Marius Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title | Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title_full | Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title_short | Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal |
title_sort | endoscopic gastric band removal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manosthierry endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT nedelcuanamaria endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT noelpatrick endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT zulianviola endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT dananmarc endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT vilallongaramon endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT carandinasergio endoscopicgastricbandremoval AT nedelcumarius endoscopicgastricbandremoval |