Cargando…

Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manos, Thierry, Nedelcu, Anamaria, Noel, Patrick, Zulian, Viola, Danan, Marc, Vilallonga, Ramon, Carandina, Sergio, Nedelcu, Marius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617
_version_ 1784876312725291008
author Manos, Thierry
Nedelcu, Anamaria
Noel, Patrick
Zulian, Viola
Danan, Marc
Vilallonga, Ramon
Carandina, Sergio
Nedelcu, Marius
author_facet Manos, Thierry
Nedelcu, Anamaria
Noel, Patrick
Zulian, Viola
Danan, Marc
Vilallonga, Ramon
Carandina, Sergio
Nedelcu, Marius
author_sort Manos, Thierry
collection PubMed
description Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any additional trauma to the gastric wall already damaged by the migration. The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of endoscopic management for intraluminal gastric band erosion following LAGB. Methods: From January 2009–December 2020, a total of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed after undergoing endoscopic gastric band removal. The study included all consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic gastric band removal in this period. No patients were excluded from the study. Data on patient demographic characteristics, case history, operative details (procedural time, adverse events), and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent endoscopic gastric band removal: 22 women (75.8%) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 28–63) and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31 ± 4.7 kg/m(2) (range: 24–41). The average time to the identification of erosion after LAGB was 42 months (range: 28–137). The initial upper endoscopy found a migrated band of more than half of the diameter in 21 cases, less than a half but more than a third in seven cases and in one case, less than a third (use of a stent). Twenty-seven patients were successfully treated with endoscopic removal, and in two cases, the endoscopic approach failed, and laparoscopy was further performed. Conclusions: The endoscopic management of intraluminal erosion after LAGB can be safe and effective and should be considered the procedure of choice when treating this complication. The percentage of the band migration is important for the timing of the endoscopic removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9867319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98673192023-01-22 Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal Manos, Thierry Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Zulian, Viola Danan, Marc Vilallonga, Ramon Carandina, Sergio Nedelcu, Marius J Clin Med Article Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedures have declined worldwide in recent years. A known complication is the intraluminal erosion of the prosthetic material. The endoscopic management of gastric band erosion represents the recommended approach nowadays, and it avoids any additional trauma to the gastric wall already damaged by the migration. The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of endoscopic management for intraluminal gastric band erosion following LAGB. Methods: From January 2009–December 2020, a total of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed after undergoing endoscopic gastric band removal. The study included all consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic gastric band removal in this period. No patients were excluded from the study. Data on patient demographic characteristics, case history, operative details (procedural time, adverse events), and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent endoscopic gastric band removal: 22 women (75.8%) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 28–63) and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31 ± 4.7 kg/m(2) (range: 24–41). The average time to the identification of erosion after LAGB was 42 months (range: 28–137). The initial upper endoscopy found a migrated band of more than half of the diameter in 21 cases, less than a half but more than a third in seven cases and in one case, less than a third (use of a stent). Twenty-seven patients were successfully treated with endoscopic removal, and in two cases, the endoscopic approach failed, and laparoscopy was further performed. Conclusions: The endoscopic management of intraluminal erosion after LAGB can be safe and effective and should be considered the procedure of choice when treating this complication. The percentage of the band migration is important for the timing of the endoscopic removal. MDPI 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9867319/ /pubmed/36675548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Manos, Thierry
Nedelcu, Anamaria
Noel, Patrick
Zulian, Viola
Danan, Marc
Vilallonga, Ramon
Carandina, Sergio
Nedelcu, Marius
Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title_full Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title_fullStr Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title_short Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal
title_sort endoscopic gastric band removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020617
work_keys_str_mv AT manosthierry endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT nedelcuanamaria endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT noelpatrick endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT zulianviola endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT dananmarc endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT vilallongaramon endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT carandinasergio endoscopicgastricbandremoval
AT nedelcumarius endoscopicgastricbandremoval