Cargando…
The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter?
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Maximizing the combination of biological control by natural enemies and plant resistance is a key strategy for controlling aphids in various crop systems. In our study, some alfalfa cultivars were found to have resistance to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, a dominant pest in alfa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36661956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14010028 |
_version_ | 1784876326116655104 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiang Wu, Qiong Mu, Jianing Chao, Zunqi He, Qi Gao, Ting Wang, Chuan McNeill, Mark R. Lu, Zhaozhi |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiang Wu, Qiong Mu, Jianing Chao, Zunqi He, Qi Gao, Ting Wang, Chuan McNeill, Mark R. Lu, Zhaozhi |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Maximizing the combination of biological control by natural enemies and plant resistance is a key strategy for controlling aphids in various crop systems. In our study, some alfalfa cultivars were found to have resistance to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, a dominant pest in alfalfa fields in northwestern China. In addition, natural enemies were able to significantly suppress this aphid, regardless of the resistance level of the nine cultivars tested. Moreover, the biological control efficacies of predators, parasitoids, and mixed populations of natural enemies were 85%, 42%, and 88%, respectively. Conservation of natural enemies in the field is an ecologically sound and efficient approach to the management of the pea aphid in alfalfa crops. ABSTRACT: The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, is a major pest of alfalfa in northwestern China. However, the roles of different groups of natural enemies in combination with aphid-resistant cultivars in the suppression of the pea aphid have not been clarified under field conditions. In this study, we used experimental cages to better understand the top-down (natural enemies) and bottom-up (nine alfalfa cultivars) biological processes, as well as the individual roles of the two processes, in the control of the pea aphid. There was a significant difference in resistance among cultivar classes revealed when natural enemies were excluded. The functional contribution of top-down suppression was higher than the bottom-up process, with natural enemies significantly suppressing aphid populations, regardless of the resistance level of different alfalfa cultivars. The mean biological efficacies of predators, parasitoids, and mixed populations of natural enemies were 85%, 42%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, our study indicated that natural enemies play a critical role in suppressing aphid populations, especially in the summer, whereas cultivar resistance did not combine effectively with natural enemies to inhibit the growth of aphids. Conservation biological control (CBC) can be implemented in the alfalfa production regions in northwestern China to reduce the overreliance on insecticides for the control of pests and mitigate their harmful effects on humans, ecosystems, and biodiversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98673722023-01-22 The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? Zhang, Xiang Wu, Qiong Mu, Jianing Chao, Zunqi He, Qi Gao, Ting Wang, Chuan McNeill, Mark R. Lu, Zhaozhi Insects Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Maximizing the combination of biological control by natural enemies and plant resistance is a key strategy for controlling aphids in various crop systems. In our study, some alfalfa cultivars were found to have resistance to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, a dominant pest in alfalfa fields in northwestern China. In addition, natural enemies were able to significantly suppress this aphid, regardless of the resistance level of the nine cultivars tested. Moreover, the biological control efficacies of predators, parasitoids, and mixed populations of natural enemies were 85%, 42%, and 88%, respectively. Conservation of natural enemies in the field is an ecologically sound and efficient approach to the management of the pea aphid in alfalfa crops. ABSTRACT: The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, is a major pest of alfalfa in northwestern China. However, the roles of different groups of natural enemies in combination with aphid-resistant cultivars in the suppression of the pea aphid have not been clarified under field conditions. In this study, we used experimental cages to better understand the top-down (natural enemies) and bottom-up (nine alfalfa cultivars) biological processes, as well as the individual roles of the two processes, in the control of the pea aphid. There was a significant difference in resistance among cultivar classes revealed when natural enemies were excluded. The functional contribution of top-down suppression was higher than the bottom-up process, with natural enemies significantly suppressing aphid populations, regardless of the resistance level of different alfalfa cultivars. The mean biological efficacies of predators, parasitoids, and mixed populations of natural enemies were 85%, 42%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, our study indicated that natural enemies play a critical role in suppressing aphid populations, especially in the summer, whereas cultivar resistance did not combine effectively with natural enemies to inhibit the growth of aphids. Conservation biological control (CBC) can be implemented in the alfalfa production regions in northwestern China to reduce the overreliance on insecticides for the control of pests and mitigate their harmful effects on humans, ecosystems, and biodiversity. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9867372/ /pubmed/36661956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14010028 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Xiang Wu, Qiong Mu, Jianing Chao, Zunqi He, Qi Gao, Ting Wang, Chuan McNeill, Mark R. Lu, Zhaozhi The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title | The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title_full | The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title_short | The Efficacy of Biological Control for the Suppression of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum): Does the Resistance of Alfalfa Cultivars Matter? |
title_sort | efficacy of biological control for the suppression of the pea aphid (acyrthosiphon pisum): does the resistance of alfalfa cultivars matter? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36661956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects14010028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiang theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT wuqiong theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT mujianing theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT chaozunqi theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT heqi theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT gaoting theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT wangchuan theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT mcneillmarkr theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT luzhaozhi theefficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT zhangxiang efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT wuqiong efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT mujianing efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT chaozunqi efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT heqi efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT gaoting efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT wangchuan efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT mcneillmarkr efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter AT luzhaozhi efficacyofbiologicalcontrolforthesuppressionofthepeaaphidacyrthosiphonpisumdoestheresistanceofalfalfacultivarsmatter |