Cargando…

Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study

Background: Endodontic treatment objectives comprise eliminating or decreasing bacterial load inside the complex endodontic space. Removing the smear layer and debris becomes mandatory to achieve good three-dimensional (3D) cleaning. Aim: This study assesses the difference in smear layer removal usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iandolo, Alfredo, Pisano, Massimo, Abdellatif, Dina, Sangiovanni, Giuseppe, Pantaleo, Giuseppe, Martina, Stefano, Amato, Alessandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020492
_version_ 1784876344422694912
author Iandolo, Alfredo
Pisano, Massimo
Abdellatif, Dina
Sangiovanni, Giuseppe
Pantaleo, Giuseppe
Martina, Stefano
Amato, Alessandra
author_facet Iandolo, Alfredo
Pisano, Massimo
Abdellatif, Dina
Sangiovanni, Giuseppe
Pantaleo, Giuseppe
Martina, Stefano
Amato, Alessandra
author_sort Iandolo, Alfredo
collection PubMed
description Background: Endodontic treatment objectives comprise eliminating or decreasing bacterial load inside the complex endodontic space. Removing the smear layer and debris becomes mandatory to achieve good three-dimensional (3D) cleaning. Aim: This study assesses the difference in smear layer removal using the 3D cleaning technique and traditional syringe needle irrigation. The 3D cleaning technique includes the ultrasonic activation of intracanal-heated NaOCl. Materials and Methods: Our current study used single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth to test the earlier-mentioned technique (n = 30). Initially, an endodontic access cavity was performed. Consequently, specimens were randomly distributed into three study groups according to irrigation protocol. The groups were Group 1, where the traditional syringe needle irrigation system was applied; Group 2, where the 3D cleaning technique was performed; and Group 3, in which teeth remained uncleaned as it was regarded as the control group. Once the experiment was completed, the teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000× magnification and scored. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with a standard statistical software package (SPSS, version 28.0; SPSS IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were analyzed with a nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA) among the groups tested and among the thirds of the canals. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean smear layer and debris score was observed in both study groups compared to the control group. Group 2 showed better results compared to Group 1. Conclusions: The present study concluded that the 3D cleaning technique is an effective irrigation method for removing debris and smear layers. Future research, such as CLSM (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy) and Histological study, should be employed to confirm this study’s conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9867447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98674472023-01-22 Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study Iandolo, Alfredo Pisano, Massimo Abdellatif, Dina Sangiovanni, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Giuseppe Martina, Stefano Amato, Alessandra J Clin Med Article Background: Endodontic treatment objectives comprise eliminating or decreasing bacterial load inside the complex endodontic space. Removing the smear layer and debris becomes mandatory to achieve good three-dimensional (3D) cleaning. Aim: This study assesses the difference in smear layer removal using the 3D cleaning technique and traditional syringe needle irrigation. The 3D cleaning technique includes the ultrasonic activation of intracanal-heated NaOCl. Materials and Methods: Our current study used single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth to test the earlier-mentioned technique (n = 30). Initially, an endodontic access cavity was performed. Consequently, specimens were randomly distributed into three study groups according to irrigation protocol. The groups were Group 1, where the traditional syringe needle irrigation system was applied; Group 2, where the 3D cleaning technique was performed; and Group 3, in which teeth remained uncleaned as it was regarded as the control group. Once the experiment was completed, the teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000× magnification and scored. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with a standard statistical software package (SPSS, version 28.0; SPSS IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were analyzed with a nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA) among the groups tested and among the thirds of the canals. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean smear layer and debris score was observed in both study groups compared to the control group. Group 2 showed better results compared to Group 1. Conclusions: The present study concluded that the 3D cleaning technique is an effective irrigation method for removing debris and smear layers. Future research, such as CLSM (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy) and Histological study, should be employed to confirm this study’s conclusion. MDPI 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9867447/ /pubmed/36675419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020492 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iandolo, Alfredo
Pisano, Massimo
Abdellatif, Dina
Sangiovanni, Giuseppe
Pantaleo, Giuseppe
Martina, Stefano
Amato, Alessandra
Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title_fullStr Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title_short Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study
title_sort smear layer and debris removal from root canals comparing traditional syringe irrigation and 3d cleaning: an ex vivo study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36675419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020492
work_keys_str_mv AT iandoloalfredo smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT pisanomassimo smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT abdellatifdina smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT sangiovannigiuseppe smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT pantaleogiuseppe smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT martinastefano smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy
AT amatoalessandra smearlayeranddebrisremovalfromrootcanalscomparingtraditionalsyringeirrigationand3dcleaninganexvivostudy