Cargando…
Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis
Right ventricular (RV) volumes are commonly obtained through time-consuming manual delineations of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Deep learning-based methods can generate RV delineations, but few studies have assessed their ability to accelerate clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to de...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28348-y |
_version_ | 1784876408277827584 |
---|---|
author | Åkesson, Julius Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar |
author_facet | Åkesson, Julius Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar |
author_sort | Åkesson, Julius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Right ventricular (RV) volumes are commonly obtained through time-consuming manual delineations of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Deep learning-based methods can generate RV delineations, but few studies have assessed their ability to accelerate clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to develop a clinical pipeline for deep learning-based RV delineations and validate its ability to reduce the manual delineation time. Quality-controlled delineations in short-axis CMR scans from 1114 subjects were used for development. Time reduction was assessed by two observers using 50 additional clinical scans. Automated delineations were subjectively rated as (A) sufficient for clinical use, or as needing (B) minor or (C) major corrections. Times were measured for manual corrections of delineations rated as B or C, and for fully manual delineations on all 50 scans. Fifty-eight % of automated delineations were rated as A, 42% as B, and none as C. The average time was 6 min for a fully manual delineation, 2 s for an automated delineation, and 2 min for a minor correction, yielding a time reduction of 87%. The deep learning-based pipeline could substantially reduce the time needed to manually obtain clinically applicable delineations, indicating ability to yield right ventricular assessments faster than fully manual analysis in clinical practice. However, these results may not generalize to clinics using other RV delineation guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98677282023-01-23 Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis Åkesson, Julius Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar Sci Rep Article Right ventricular (RV) volumes are commonly obtained through time-consuming manual delineations of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Deep learning-based methods can generate RV delineations, but few studies have assessed their ability to accelerate clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to develop a clinical pipeline for deep learning-based RV delineations and validate its ability to reduce the manual delineation time. Quality-controlled delineations in short-axis CMR scans from 1114 subjects were used for development. Time reduction was assessed by two observers using 50 additional clinical scans. Automated delineations were subjectively rated as (A) sufficient for clinical use, or as needing (B) minor or (C) major corrections. Times were measured for manual corrections of delineations rated as B or C, and for fully manual delineations on all 50 scans. Fifty-eight % of automated delineations were rated as A, 42% as B, and none as C. The average time was 6 min for a fully manual delineation, 2 s for an automated delineation, and 2 min for a minor correction, yielding a time reduction of 87%. The deep learning-based pipeline could substantially reduce the time needed to manually obtain clinically applicable delineations, indicating ability to yield right ventricular assessments faster than fully manual analysis in clinical practice. However, these results may not generalize to clinics using other RV delineation guidelines. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9867728/ /pubmed/36681759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28348-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Åkesson, Julius Ostenfeld, Ellen Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title | Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title_full | Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title_fullStr | Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title_short | Deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
title_sort | deep learning can yield clinically useful right ventricular segmentations faster than fully manual analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28348-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akessonjulius deeplearningcanyieldclinicallyusefulrightventricularsegmentationsfasterthanfullymanualanalysis AT ostenfeldellen deeplearningcanyieldclinicallyusefulrightventricularsegmentationsfasterthanfullymanualanalysis AT carlssonmarcus deeplearningcanyieldclinicallyusefulrightventricularsegmentationsfasterthanfullymanualanalysis AT arhedenhakan deeplearningcanyieldclinicallyusefulrightventricularsegmentationsfasterthanfullymanualanalysis AT heibergeinar deeplearningcanyieldclinicallyusefulrightventricularsegmentationsfasterthanfullymanualanalysis |