Cargando…
A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expressio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528 |
_version_ | 1784876433390174208 |
---|---|
author | Poojari, Yogitha Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy Vijayan, Sharmila Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar Mf, Yuvaraj Pk, Sankaran |
author_facet | Poojari, Yogitha Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy Vijayan, Sharmila Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar Mf, Yuvaraj Pk, Sankaran |
author_sort | Poojari, Yogitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expression of growth pattern in the fetus. So this study was done to compare the maternal age with the third trimester fetal biometric parameters. METHODS: This study was done in 100 antenatal women and divided into two groups: Group 1: optimal maternal age group between 21–29 years of age and Group 2: advanced maternal age 30 and above. The pre-pregnant maternal weight, gestational age and third trimester fetal biometrics using ultrasound are noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The maternal weight gain between the groups was optimal but the third trimester fetal parameters were significantly less in advanced maternal age. The abdominal circumference in optimal age group and head circumference in advanced maternal age group was closer to calculated estimated date of delivery (EDD) and would be specific in calculating the gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Though there is no significant difference in maternal weight gain, there are fetal growth restrictions in advanced maternal age group due to which the third trimester fetal parameters are lesser than the optimal age group. Head circumference would be specific in calculating the estimated date of delivery in advanced maternal age group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98678752023-01-23 A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age Poojari, Yogitha Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy Vijayan, Sharmila Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar Mf, Yuvaraj Pk, Sankaran PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expression of growth pattern in the fetus. So this study was done to compare the maternal age with the third trimester fetal biometric parameters. METHODS: This study was done in 100 antenatal women and divided into two groups: Group 1: optimal maternal age group between 21–29 years of age and Group 2: advanced maternal age 30 and above. The pre-pregnant maternal weight, gestational age and third trimester fetal biometrics using ultrasound are noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The maternal weight gain between the groups was optimal but the third trimester fetal parameters were significantly less in advanced maternal age. The abdominal circumference in optimal age group and head circumference in advanced maternal age group was closer to calculated estimated date of delivery (EDD) and would be specific in calculating the gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Though there is no significant difference in maternal weight gain, there are fetal growth restrictions in advanced maternal age group due to which the third trimester fetal parameters are lesser than the optimal age group. Head circumference would be specific in calculating the estimated date of delivery in advanced maternal age group. PeerJ Inc. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9867875/ /pubmed/36694822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528 Text en ©2023 Poojari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anatomy and Physiology Poojari, Yogitha Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy Vijayan, Sharmila Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar Mf, Yuvaraj Pk, Sankaran A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title | A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title_full | A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title_short | A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
title_sort | comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age |
topic | Anatomy and Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poojariyogitha acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT annapureddyprudhvinathreddy acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT vijayansharmila acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT kalidossvinothkumar acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT mfyuvaraj acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT pksankaran acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT poojariyogitha comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT annapureddyprudhvinathreddy comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT vijayansharmila comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT kalidossvinothkumar comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT mfyuvaraj comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage AT pksankaran comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage |