Cargando…

A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age

BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poojari, Yogitha, Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy, Vijayan, Sharmila, Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar, Mf, Yuvaraj, Pk, Sankaran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694822
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528
_version_ 1784876433390174208
author Poojari, Yogitha
Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy
Vijayan, Sharmila
Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar
Mf, Yuvaraj
Pk, Sankaran
author_facet Poojari, Yogitha
Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy
Vijayan, Sharmila
Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar
Mf, Yuvaraj
Pk, Sankaran
author_sort Poojari, Yogitha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expression of growth pattern in the fetus. So this study was done to compare the maternal age with the third trimester fetal biometric parameters. METHODS: This study was done in 100 antenatal women and divided into two groups: Group 1: optimal maternal age group between 21–29 years of age and Group 2: advanced maternal age 30 and above. The pre-pregnant maternal weight, gestational age and third trimester fetal biometrics using ultrasound are noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The maternal weight gain between the groups was optimal but the third trimester fetal parameters were significantly less in advanced maternal age. The abdominal circumference in optimal age group and head circumference in advanced maternal age group was closer to calculated estimated date of delivery (EDD) and would be specific in calculating the gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Though there is no significant difference in maternal weight gain, there are fetal growth restrictions in advanced maternal age group due to which the third trimester fetal parameters are lesser than the optimal age group. Head circumference would be specific in calculating the estimated date of delivery in advanced maternal age group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9867875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98678752023-01-23 A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age Poojari, Yogitha Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy Vijayan, Sharmila Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar Mf, Yuvaraj Pk, Sankaran PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age is an important parameter associated with increased risk of feto-maternal complications and it is an evolving trend in society for women planning for pregnancy in late ages. However there are no studies done whether advanced maternal age has its effects on expression of growth pattern in the fetus. So this study was done to compare the maternal age with the third trimester fetal biometric parameters. METHODS: This study was done in 100 antenatal women and divided into two groups: Group 1: optimal maternal age group between 21–29 years of age and Group 2: advanced maternal age 30 and above. The pre-pregnant maternal weight, gestational age and third trimester fetal biometrics using ultrasound are noted and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The maternal weight gain between the groups was optimal but the third trimester fetal parameters were significantly less in advanced maternal age. The abdominal circumference in optimal age group and head circumference in advanced maternal age group was closer to calculated estimated date of delivery (EDD) and would be specific in calculating the gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Though there is no significant difference in maternal weight gain, there are fetal growth restrictions in advanced maternal age group due to which the third trimester fetal parameters are lesser than the optimal age group. Head circumference would be specific in calculating the estimated date of delivery in advanced maternal age group. PeerJ Inc. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9867875/ /pubmed/36694822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528 Text en ©2023 Poojari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Poojari, Yogitha
Annapureddy, Prudhvinath reddy
Vijayan, Sharmila
Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar
Mf, Yuvaraj
Pk, Sankaran
A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title_full A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title_fullStr A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title_short A comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
title_sort comparative study on third trimester fetal biometric parameters with maternal age
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694822
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14528
work_keys_str_mv AT poojariyogitha acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT annapureddyprudhvinathreddy acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT vijayansharmila acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT kalidossvinothkumar acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT mfyuvaraj acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT pksankaran acomparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT poojariyogitha comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT annapureddyprudhvinathreddy comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT vijayansharmila comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT kalidossvinothkumar comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT mfyuvaraj comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage
AT pksankaran comparativestudyonthirdtrimesterfetalbiometricparameterswithmaternalage