Cargando…
Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886 |
_version_ | 1784876433897684992 |
---|---|
author | Kuypers, Maybritt I. Veldhuis, Lars I. Mencl, Francis van Riel, Anne Thijssen, Wendy A. H. M. Tromp, Ellen Goslings, J. Carel Plötz, Frans B. |
author_facet | Kuypers, Maybritt I. Veldhuis, Lars I. Mencl, Francis van Riel, Anne Thijssen, Wendy A. H. M. Tromp, Ellen Goslings, J. Carel Plötz, Frans B. |
author_sort | Kuypers, Maybritt I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this systematic review is to compare these 2 techniques on pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay (LOS) in the ED. METHODS: We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and references were hand‐searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA with NBs for orthopedic reductions in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and LOS in the ED. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted data into a standardized form. The Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool was used to evaluate study quality. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty and strength of the evidence. Data on pain scores were pooled using a random‐effects model and are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs (n = 256) were included in a qualitative review, and 4 RCTs (n = 101) were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the PSA and NB groups (P = 0.47; SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.78 to 1.69; I(2) = 0.94). There were less adverse events in the NB group (0%–3.3%) compared with the PSA group (0%–20%; n = 256). LOS times were consistently shorter in the NB group (n = 215). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups (n = 196). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, NBs performed by emergency physicians are as effective as PSA in managing pain during orthopedic reductions in the ED. NBs are associated with fewer adverse events and shorter LOS in the ED. The quality of evidence is low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9867878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98678782023-01-25 Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Kuypers, Maybritt I. Veldhuis, Lars I. Mencl, Francis van Riel, Anne Thijssen, Wendy A. H. M. Tromp, Ellen Goslings, J. Carel Plötz, Frans B. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Pain Management and Sedation BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this systematic review is to compare these 2 techniques on pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay (LOS) in the ED. METHODS: We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and references were hand‐searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA with NBs for orthopedic reductions in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and LOS in the ED. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted data into a standardized form. The Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool was used to evaluate study quality. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty and strength of the evidence. Data on pain scores were pooled using a random‐effects model and are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs (n = 256) were included in a qualitative review, and 4 RCTs (n = 101) were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the PSA and NB groups (P = 0.47; SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.78 to 1.69; I(2) = 0.94). There were less adverse events in the NB group (0%–3.3%) compared with the PSA group (0%–20%; n = 256). LOS times were consistently shorter in the NB group (n = 215). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups (n = 196). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, NBs performed by emergency physicians are as effective as PSA in managing pain during orthopedic reductions in the ED. NBs are associated with fewer adverse events and shorter LOS in the ED. The quality of evidence is low. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9867878/ /pubmed/36704208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Pain Management and Sedation Kuypers, Maybritt I. Veldhuis, Lars I. Mencl, Francis van Riel, Anne Thijssen, Wendy A. H. M. Tromp, Ellen Goslings, J. Carel Plötz, Frans B. Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Pain Management and Sedation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuypersmaybritti proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT veldhuislarsi proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT menclfrancis proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanrielanne proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thijssenwendyahm proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trompellen proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goslingsjcarel proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT plotzfransb proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |