Cargando…
Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes
Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, cust...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036882 |
_version_ | 1784876471084384256 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Zehao Peng, Yongjun Shen, Qiling Li, Jian He, Peng Yuan, Peng Liu, Yulei Que, Yukang Guo, Wei Hu, Yong Xu, Shenglin |
author_facet | Guo, Zehao Peng, Yongjun Shen, Qiling Li, Jian He, Peng Yuan, Peng Liu, Yulei Que, Yukang Guo, Wei Hu, Yong Xu, Shenglin |
author_sort | Guo, Zehao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis with pedicle screw–rod system and sacral tray using finite element analysis. Methods: Four models that included one intact pelvis were established for validation. Forces of 500 N and 2,000 N were applied, respectively, to simulate static bipedal standing and the most loaded condition during a gait cycle. Biomechanical analysis was performed, and the results were compared; the preliminary outcomes of four patients were recorded. Results: For the reconstructed hemipelvis, stress was mainly concentrated on the sacral screws, bone–prosthesis interface, and upper endplate of the L5 vertebra. The optimization of the design with the sacral tray structure could decrease the peak stress of the sacral screws by 18.6%, while the maximal stress of the prosthesis increased by 60.7%. The addition of the lumbosacral pedicle–rod system further alleviated stress of the sacral screws and prosthesis by 30.2% and 19.4%, respectively. The site of peak stress was contemporaneously transferred to the connecting rods within an elastic range. In the retrospective clinical study, four patients who had undergone prosthetic reconstruction were included. During a follow-up of 16.6 ± 7.5 months, the walking ability was found preserved in all patients who are still alive and no prosthesis-related complications had occurred except for one hip dislocation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was found to be 19.5 ± 2.9. Conclusion: The novel reconstructive system yielded favorable biomechanical characteristics and demonstrated promising preliminary outcomes. The method can be used as a reference for reconstruction after type I + II + III hemipelvectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9868148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98681482023-01-24 Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes Guo, Zehao Peng, Yongjun Shen, Qiling Li, Jian He, Peng Yuan, Peng Liu, Yulei Que, Yukang Guo, Wei Hu, Yong Xu, Shenglin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis with pedicle screw–rod system and sacral tray using finite element analysis. Methods: Four models that included one intact pelvis were established for validation. Forces of 500 N and 2,000 N were applied, respectively, to simulate static bipedal standing and the most loaded condition during a gait cycle. Biomechanical analysis was performed, and the results were compared; the preliminary outcomes of four patients were recorded. Results: For the reconstructed hemipelvis, stress was mainly concentrated on the sacral screws, bone–prosthesis interface, and upper endplate of the L5 vertebra. The optimization of the design with the sacral tray structure could decrease the peak stress of the sacral screws by 18.6%, while the maximal stress of the prosthesis increased by 60.7%. The addition of the lumbosacral pedicle–rod system further alleviated stress of the sacral screws and prosthesis by 30.2% and 19.4%, respectively. The site of peak stress was contemporaneously transferred to the connecting rods within an elastic range. In the retrospective clinical study, four patients who had undergone prosthetic reconstruction were included. During a follow-up of 16.6 ± 7.5 months, the walking ability was found preserved in all patients who are still alive and no prosthesis-related complications had occurred except for one hip dislocation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was found to be 19.5 ± 2.9. Conclusion: The novel reconstructive system yielded favorable biomechanical characteristics and demonstrated promising preliminary outcomes. The method can be used as a reference for reconstruction after type I + II + III hemipelvectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868148/ /pubmed/36698627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036882 Text en Copyright © 2023 Guo, Peng, Shen, Li, He, Yuan, Liu, Que, Guo, Hu and Xu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Guo, Zehao Peng, Yongjun Shen, Qiling Li, Jian He, Peng Yuan, Peng Liu, Yulei Que, Yukang Guo, Wei Hu, Yong Xu, Shenglin Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title | Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title_full | Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title_fullStr | Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title_short | Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
title_sort | reconstruction with 3d-printed prostheses after type i + ii + iii internal hemipelvectomy: finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guozehao reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT pengyongjun reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT shenqiling reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT lijian reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT hepeng reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT yuanpeng reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT liuyulei reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT queyukang reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT guowei reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT huyong reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes AT xushenglin reconstructionwith3dprintedprosthesesaftertypeiiiiiiinternalhemipelvectomyfiniteelementanalysisandpreliminaryoutcomes |