Cargando…

Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common hemoglobinopathies. Due to its high prevalence, with about 20 million affected individuals worldwide, the development of novel effective treatments is highly warranted. While transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarghamian, Parinaz, Klermund, Julia, Cathomen, Toni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065377
_version_ 1784876506292420608
author Zarghamian, Parinaz
Klermund, Julia
Cathomen, Toni
author_facet Zarghamian, Parinaz
Klermund, Julia
Cathomen, Toni
author_sort Zarghamian, Parinaz
collection PubMed
description Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common hemoglobinopathies. Due to its high prevalence, with about 20 million affected individuals worldwide, the development of novel effective treatments is highly warranted. While transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the standard curative treatment approach, a variety of gene transfer and genome editing strategies have demonstrated their potential to provide a prospective cure for SCD patients. Several stratagems employing CRISPR-Cas nucleases or base editors aim at reactivation of γ-globin expression to replace the faulty β-globin chain. The fetal hemoglobin (HbF), consisting of two α-globin and two γ-globin chains, can compensate for defective adult hemoglobin (HbA) and reverse the sickling of hemoglobin-S (HbS). Both disruption of cis-regulatory elements that are involved in inhibiting γ-globin expression, such as BCL11A or LRF binding sites in the γ-globin gene promoters (HBG1/2), or the lineage-specific disruption of BCL11A to reduce its expression in human erythroblasts, have been demonstrated to reestablish HbF expression. Alternatively, the point mutation in the HBB gene has been corrected using homology-directed repair (HDR)-based methodologies. In general, genome editing has shown promising results not only in preclinical animal models but also in clinical trials, both in terms of efficacy and safety. This review provides a brief update on the recent clinical advances in the genome editing space to offer cure for SCD patients, discusses open questions with regard to off-target effects induced by the employed genome editors, and gives an outlook of forthcoming developments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9868311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98683112023-01-24 Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update Zarghamian, Parinaz Klermund, Julia Cathomen, Toni Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common hemoglobinopathies. Due to its high prevalence, with about 20 million affected individuals worldwide, the development of novel effective treatments is highly warranted. While transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the standard curative treatment approach, a variety of gene transfer and genome editing strategies have demonstrated their potential to provide a prospective cure for SCD patients. Several stratagems employing CRISPR-Cas nucleases or base editors aim at reactivation of γ-globin expression to replace the faulty β-globin chain. The fetal hemoglobin (HbF), consisting of two α-globin and two γ-globin chains, can compensate for defective adult hemoglobin (HbA) and reverse the sickling of hemoglobin-S (HbS). Both disruption of cis-regulatory elements that are involved in inhibiting γ-globin expression, such as BCL11A or LRF binding sites in the γ-globin gene promoters (HBG1/2), or the lineage-specific disruption of BCL11A to reduce its expression in human erythroblasts, have been demonstrated to reestablish HbF expression. Alternatively, the point mutation in the HBB gene has been corrected using homology-directed repair (HDR)-based methodologies. In general, genome editing has shown promising results not only in preclinical animal models but also in clinical trials, both in terms of efficacy and safety. This review provides a brief update on the recent clinical advances in the genome editing space to offer cure for SCD patients, discusses open questions with regard to off-target effects induced by the employed genome editors, and gives an outlook of forthcoming developments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868311/ /pubmed/36698803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065377 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zarghamian, Klermund and Cathomen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zarghamian, Parinaz
Klermund, Julia
Cathomen, Toni
Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title_full Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title_fullStr Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title_full_unstemmed Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title_short Clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—A brief update
title_sort clinical genome editing to treat sickle cell disease—a brief update
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065377
work_keys_str_mv AT zarghamianparinaz clinicalgenomeeditingtotreatsicklecelldiseaseabriefupdate
AT klermundjulia clinicalgenomeeditingtotreatsicklecelldiseaseabriefupdate
AT cathomentoni clinicalgenomeeditingtotreatsicklecelldiseaseabriefupdate