Cargando…
Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring circulating progesterone concentration ([P4]) is an important component of basic and applied reproduction research and clinical settings. IMMULITE(®) 2000 XPi (Siemens Healthineers, Cary, NC) is a newly upgraded fully automated immunoassay system marketed for human use to me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1064201 |
_version_ | 1784876544410255360 |
---|---|
author | Megahed, Ameer A. Jones, Kristi L. Bisinotto, Rafael S. Chebel, Ricardo C. Galvão, Klibs N. Chan, Ann M. Bittar, João H. J. |
author_facet | Megahed, Ameer A. Jones, Kristi L. Bisinotto, Rafael S. Chebel, Ricardo C. Galvão, Klibs N. Chan, Ann M. Bittar, João H. J. |
author_sort | Megahed, Ameer A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Monitoring circulating progesterone concentration ([P4]) is an important component of basic and applied reproduction research and clinical settings. IMMULITE(®) 2000 XPi (Siemens Healthineers, Cary, NC) is a newly upgraded fully automated immunoassay system marketed for human use to measure concentrations of different measurands including P4. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was therefore to characterize the analytical performance of the IMMULITE(®) 2000 XPi P4 immunoassay (IPI) across the reportable range in serum and plasma of cattle. METHODS: The IPI validation protocols included characterization of the method linearity, within-run, and between-run precision through calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). The method accuracy was assessed through the calculation of the spiking-recovery (SR) bias across the reportable range (0.2–40.0 ng/mL). Passing–Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the interlaboratory bias for two laboratories. Three types of observed total error (TEo) were calculated based on the considered type of bias, TEo(SR) (spiking-recovery), TEo(RB) (range-based bias), and TEo(AB) (average-based bias). RESULTS: The IPI was linearly related to the true value (R(2) = 0.997) across the reportable range. The within-run and between-run precision (CV%) of the IPI for both serum and plasma [P4] of clinical relevance (1, 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL) were <5 and <10%, respectively. The TEo reported here for serum and plasma at [P4] of 1 and 5 ng/mL was ~20 and 25%, respectively. Of interest, the three types of TEo were relatively similar regardless of the considered bias. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the automated IPI provides a precise, accurate, reliable, and safe method for measuring [P4] in both serum and plasma of cattle. Consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations, the serum matrix is more accurate than plasma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9868466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98684662023-01-24 Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement Megahed, Ameer A. Jones, Kristi L. Bisinotto, Rafael S. Chebel, Ricardo C. Galvão, Klibs N. Chan, Ann M. Bittar, João H. J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: Monitoring circulating progesterone concentration ([P4]) is an important component of basic and applied reproduction research and clinical settings. IMMULITE(®) 2000 XPi (Siemens Healthineers, Cary, NC) is a newly upgraded fully automated immunoassay system marketed for human use to measure concentrations of different measurands including P4. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was therefore to characterize the analytical performance of the IMMULITE(®) 2000 XPi P4 immunoassay (IPI) across the reportable range in serum and plasma of cattle. METHODS: The IPI validation protocols included characterization of the method linearity, within-run, and between-run precision through calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). The method accuracy was assessed through the calculation of the spiking-recovery (SR) bias across the reportable range (0.2–40.0 ng/mL). Passing–Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the interlaboratory bias for two laboratories. Three types of observed total error (TEo) were calculated based on the considered type of bias, TEo(SR) (spiking-recovery), TEo(RB) (range-based bias), and TEo(AB) (average-based bias). RESULTS: The IPI was linearly related to the true value (R(2) = 0.997) across the reportable range. The within-run and between-run precision (CV%) of the IPI for both serum and plasma [P4] of clinical relevance (1, 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL) were <5 and <10%, respectively. The TEo reported here for serum and plasma at [P4] of 1 and 5 ng/mL was ~20 and 25%, respectively. Of interest, the three types of TEo were relatively similar regardless of the considered bias. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the automated IPI provides a precise, accurate, reliable, and safe method for measuring [P4] in both serum and plasma of cattle. Consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations, the serum matrix is more accurate than plasma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868466/ /pubmed/36699340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1064201 Text en Copyright © 2023 Megahed, Jones, Bisinotto, Chebel, Galvão, Chan and Bittar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Megahed, Ameer A. Jones, Kristi L. Bisinotto, Rafael S. Chebel, Ricardo C. Galvão, Klibs N. Chan, Ann M. Bittar, João H. J. Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title | Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title_full | Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title_fullStr | Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title_short | Validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
title_sort | validation of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for cattle serum and plasma progesterone measurement |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1064201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT megahedameera validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT joneskristil validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT bisinottorafaels validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT chebelricardoc validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT galvaoklibsn validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT chanannm validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement AT bittarjoaohj validationofafullyautomatedchemiluminescentimmunoassayforcattleserumandplasmaprogesteronemeasurement |