Cargando…

Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI

INTRODUCTION: By a series of calls within the Horizon 2020 framework programme, the EU funded projects intended to deploy Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) at a territorial level, in regional research and innovation ecosystems. This paper presents efforts to document and evaluate the achieve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Völker, Thomas, Mazzonetto, Marzia, Slaattelid, Rasmus, Strand, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.1038970
_version_ 1784876574726684672
author Völker, Thomas
Mazzonetto, Marzia
Slaattelid, Rasmus
Strand, Roger
author_facet Völker, Thomas
Mazzonetto, Marzia
Slaattelid, Rasmus
Strand, Roger
author_sort Völker, Thomas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: By a series of calls within the Horizon 2020 framework programme, the EU funded projects intended to deploy Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) at a territorial level, in regional research and innovation ecosystems. This paper presents efforts to document and evaluate the achievements in TRANSFORM, one of these projects. METHODS: Evaluative inquiry and theoretical reasoning. RESULTS: Noting the need for a general principle to be interpreted, adapted and translated in order to be rendered meaningful at a local level, we studied precisely these multiple territorial translations of RRI, the organizational and institutional orderings with which they co-emerge and the challenges that come with these translations. An important shared feature is that RRI work does not start from zero, but rather builds on pre-existing relationships and repertoires of collaboration. The RRI project is hence a way to continue ongoing work and follow pre-set purposes, aims and objectives, as a form of “maintenance work”. In this very human sense, RRI is deployed with a logic of care in the regional context, while the Horizon 2020 calls and proposals above all are formulated in a logic of choice, to be assessed by indicators. DISCUSSION: We warn against undue standardization of RRI by toolification and use of quantitative indicators, and recommend that RRI performance is monitored by methods of evaluative inquiry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9868598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98685982023-01-24 Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI Völker, Thomas Mazzonetto, Marzia Slaattelid, Rasmus Strand, Roger Front Res Metr Anal Research Metrics and Analytics INTRODUCTION: By a series of calls within the Horizon 2020 framework programme, the EU funded projects intended to deploy Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) at a territorial level, in regional research and innovation ecosystems. This paper presents efforts to document and evaluate the achievements in TRANSFORM, one of these projects. METHODS: Evaluative inquiry and theoretical reasoning. RESULTS: Noting the need for a general principle to be interpreted, adapted and translated in order to be rendered meaningful at a local level, we studied precisely these multiple territorial translations of RRI, the organizational and institutional orderings with which they co-emerge and the challenges that come with these translations. An important shared feature is that RRI work does not start from zero, but rather builds on pre-existing relationships and repertoires of collaboration. The RRI project is hence a way to continue ongoing work and follow pre-set purposes, aims and objectives, as a form of “maintenance work”. In this very human sense, RRI is deployed with a logic of care in the regional context, while the Horizon 2020 calls and proposals above all are formulated in a logic of choice, to be assessed by indicators. DISCUSSION: We warn against undue standardization of RRI by toolification and use of quantitative indicators, and recommend that RRI performance is monitored by methods of evaluative inquiry. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868598/ /pubmed/36700150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.1038970 Text en Copyright © 2023 Völker, Mazzonetto, Slaattelid and Strand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Research Metrics and Analytics
Völker, Thomas
Mazzonetto, Marzia
Slaattelid, Rasmus
Strand, Roger
Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title_full Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title_fullStr Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title_full_unstemmed Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title_short Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
title_sort translating tools and indicators in territorial rri
topic Research Metrics and Analytics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.1038970
work_keys_str_mv AT volkerthomas translatingtoolsandindicatorsinterritorialrri
AT mazzonettomarzia translatingtoolsandindicatorsinterritorialrri
AT slaattelidrasmus translatingtoolsandindicatorsinterritorialrri
AT strandroger translatingtoolsandindicatorsinterritorialrri