Cargando…

The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Shock is associated with the activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system, and D-dimer is the degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. However, the prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Yi, Zhu, Yuansong, Xiang, Zhenxian, Sasmita, Bryan Richard, Wang, Yaxin, Ming, Gong, Chen, Siyu, Luo, Suxin, Huang, Bi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1083881
_version_ 1784876599272800256
author Jiang, Yi
Zhu, Yuansong
Xiang, Zhenxian
Sasmita, Bryan Richard
Wang, Yaxin
Ming, Gong
Chen, Siyu
Luo, Suxin
Huang, Bi
author_facet Jiang, Yi
Zhu, Yuansong
Xiang, Zhenxian
Sasmita, Bryan Richard
Wang, Yaxin
Ming, Gong
Chen, Siyu
Luo, Suxin
Huang, Bi
author_sort Jiang, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shock is associated with the activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system, and D-dimer is the degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. However, the prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS complicating AMI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including 30-day all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, atrioventricular block, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and non-fatal stroke. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were performed to assess the association between admission D-dimer and outcomes. A multivariable Cox regression model was performed to identify independent risk factors. The risk predictive potency with D-dimer added to the traditional risk scores was evaluated by C-statistics and the net reclassification index. RESULTS: Among 218 patients with CS complicating AMI, those who died during the 30-day follow-up presented with worse baseline characteristics and laboratory test results, including a higher level of D-dimer. According to the X-tile program result, the continuous plasma D-dimer level was divided into three gradients. The 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with low, medium, and high levels of D-dimer were 22.4, 53.3, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). The 30-day incidence of MACEs was 46.3, 77.0, and 89.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model, the trilogy of D-dimer level was an independent risk predictor for 30-day mortality (median D-dimer cohort: HR 1.768, 95% CI 0.982–3.183, p = 0.057; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.602, 95% CI 1.310–5.168, p = 0.006), a similar result was observed in secondary endpoint events (median D-dimer cohort: HR 2.012, 95% CI 1.329–3.044, p = 0.001; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.543, 95% CI 1.452–4.453, p = 0.001). The RCS analyses suggested non-linear associations of D-dimer with 30-day mortality. The enrollment of D-dimer improved risk discrimination for all-cause death when combined with the traditional CardShock score (C-index: 0.741 vs. 0.756, p(difference) = 0.004) and the IABP-SHOCK II score (C-index: 0.732 vs. 0.754, p(difference) = 0.006), and the GRACE score (C-index: 0.679 vs. 0.715, p(difference) < 0.001). Similar results were acquired after logarithmic transformed D-dimer was included in the risk score. The improvements in reclassification which were calculated as additional net reclassification index were 7.5, 8.6, and 12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Admission D-dimer level was independently associated with the short-term outcome in patients with CS complicating AMI and addition of D-dimer brought incremental risk prediction value to traditional risk prediction scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9868698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98686982023-01-24 The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction Jiang, Yi Zhu, Yuansong Xiang, Zhenxian Sasmita, Bryan Richard Wang, Yaxin Ming, Gong Chen, Siyu Luo, Suxin Huang, Bi Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Shock is associated with the activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system, and D-dimer is the degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. However, the prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS complicating AMI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including 30-day all-cause mortality, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, atrioventricular block, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and non-fatal stroke. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were performed to assess the association between admission D-dimer and outcomes. A multivariable Cox regression model was performed to identify independent risk factors. The risk predictive potency with D-dimer added to the traditional risk scores was evaluated by C-statistics and the net reclassification index. RESULTS: Among 218 patients with CS complicating AMI, those who died during the 30-day follow-up presented with worse baseline characteristics and laboratory test results, including a higher level of D-dimer. According to the X-tile program result, the continuous plasma D-dimer level was divided into three gradients. The 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with low, medium, and high levels of D-dimer were 22.4, 53.3, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). The 30-day incidence of MACEs was 46.3, 77.0, and 89.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model, the trilogy of D-dimer level was an independent risk predictor for 30-day mortality (median D-dimer cohort: HR 1.768, 95% CI 0.982–3.183, p = 0.057; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.602, 95% CI 1.310–5.168, p = 0.006), a similar result was observed in secondary endpoint events (median D-dimer cohort: HR 2.012, 95% CI 1.329–3.044, p = 0.001; high D-dimer cohort: HR 2.543, 95% CI 1.452–4.453, p = 0.001). The RCS analyses suggested non-linear associations of D-dimer with 30-day mortality. The enrollment of D-dimer improved risk discrimination for all-cause death when combined with the traditional CardShock score (C-index: 0.741 vs. 0.756, p(difference) = 0.004) and the IABP-SHOCK II score (C-index: 0.732 vs. 0.754, p(difference) = 0.006), and the GRACE score (C-index: 0.679 vs. 0.715, p(difference) < 0.001). Similar results were acquired after logarithmic transformed D-dimer was included in the risk score. The improvements in reclassification which were calculated as additional net reclassification index were 7.5, 8.6, and 12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Admission D-dimer level was independently associated with the short-term outcome in patients with CS complicating AMI and addition of D-dimer brought incremental risk prediction value to traditional risk prediction scores. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868698/ /pubmed/36698952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1083881 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Zhu, Xiang, Sasmita, Wang, Ming, Chen, Luo and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jiang, Yi
Zhu, Yuansong
Xiang, Zhenxian
Sasmita, Bryan Richard
Wang, Yaxin
Ming, Gong
Chen, Siyu
Luo, Suxin
Huang, Bi
The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title_full The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title_short The prognostic value of admission D-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
title_sort prognostic value of admission d-dimer level in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1083881
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyi theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT zhuyuansong theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT xiangzhenxian theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT sasmitabryanrichard theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT wangyaxin theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT minggong theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT chensiyu theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT luosuxin theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT huangbi theprognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT jiangyi prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT zhuyuansong prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT xiangzhenxian prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT sasmitabryanrichard prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT wangyaxin prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT minggong prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT chensiyu prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT luosuxin prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction
AT huangbi prognosticvalueofadmissionddimerlevelinpatientswithcardiogenicshockafteracutemyocardialinfarction