Cargando…

Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cortical excitability during instructed threat processing. METHODS: Single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses were applied to the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during high-density electroencephalography (EEG) recording in young healthy part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chirumamilla, Venkata C., Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel, Meyer, Benjamin, Anwar, Abdul Rauf, Ding, Hao, Radetz, Angela, Bonertz, Tamara, Groppa, Sergiu, Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1065469
_version_ 1784876632467570688
author Chirumamilla, Venkata C.
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel
Meyer, Benjamin
Anwar, Abdul Rauf
Ding, Hao
Radetz, Angela
Bonertz, Tamara
Groppa, Sergiu
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
author_facet Chirumamilla, Venkata C.
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel
Meyer, Benjamin
Anwar, Abdul Rauf
Ding, Hao
Radetz, Angela
Bonertz, Tamara
Groppa, Sergiu
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
author_sort Chirumamilla, Venkata C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cortical excitability during instructed threat processing. METHODS: Single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses were applied to the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during high-density electroencephalography (EEG) recording in young healthy participants (n = 17) performing an instructed threat paradigm in which one of two conditioned stimuli (CS+ but not CS-) was paired with an electric shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]). We assessed TMS-induced EEG responses with spectral power (both at electrode and source level) and information flow (effective connectivity) using Time-resolved Partial Directed Coherence (TPDC). Support vector regression (SVR) was used to predict behavioral fear ratings for CS+ based on TMS impact on excitability. RESULTS: During intracortical facilitation (ICF), frontal lobe theta power was enhanced for CS+ compared to single pulse TMS for the time window 0–0.5 s after TMS pulse onset (t(16) = 3.9, p < 0.05). At source level, ICF led to an increase and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) to a decrease of theta power in the bilateral dmPFC, relative to single pulse TMS during 0–0.5 s. Compared to single pulse TMS, ICF increased information flows, whereas SICI reduced the information flows in theta band between dmPFC, amygdala, and hippocampus (all at p < 0.05). The magnitude of information flows between dmPFC to amygdala and dmPFC to hippocampus during ICF (0–0.5 s), predicted individual behavioral fear ratings (CS+; coefficient above 0.75). CONCLUSION: Distinct excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms take place in the dmPFC. These findings may facilitate future research attempting to investigate inhibitory/facilitatory mechanisms alterations in psychiatric disorders and their behavioral correlates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9868831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98688312023-01-24 Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing Chirumamilla, Venkata C. Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel Meyer, Benjamin Anwar, Abdul Rauf Ding, Hao Radetz, Angela Bonertz, Tamara Groppa, Sergiu Muthuraman, Muthuraman Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cortical excitability during instructed threat processing. METHODS: Single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses were applied to the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during high-density electroencephalography (EEG) recording in young healthy participants (n = 17) performing an instructed threat paradigm in which one of two conditioned stimuli (CS+ but not CS-) was paired with an electric shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]). We assessed TMS-induced EEG responses with spectral power (both at electrode and source level) and information flow (effective connectivity) using Time-resolved Partial Directed Coherence (TPDC). Support vector regression (SVR) was used to predict behavioral fear ratings for CS+ based on TMS impact on excitability. RESULTS: During intracortical facilitation (ICF), frontal lobe theta power was enhanced for CS+ compared to single pulse TMS for the time window 0–0.5 s after TMS pulse onset (t(16) = 3.9, p < 0.05). At source level, ICF led to an increase and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) to a decrease of theta power in the bilateral dmPFC, relative to single pulse TMS during 0–0.5 s. Compared to single pulse TMS, ICF increased information flows, whereas SICI reduced the information flows in theta band between dmPFC, amygdala, and hippocampus (all at p < 0.05). The magnitude of information flows between dmPFC to amygdala and dmPFC to hippocampus during ICF (0–0.5 s), predicted individual behavioral fear ratings (CS+; coefficient above 0.75). CONCLUSION: Distinct excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms take place in the dmPFC. These findings may facilitate future research attempting to investigate inhibitory/facilitatory mechanisms alterations in psychiatric disorders and their behavioral correlates. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9868831/ /pubmed/36699539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1065469 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chirumamilla, Gonzalez-Escamilla, Meyer, Anwar, Ding, Radetz, Bonertz, Groppa and Muthuraman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chirumamilla, Venkata C.
Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel
Meyer, Benjamin
Anwar, Abdul Rauf
Ding, Hao
Radetz, Angela
Bonertz, Tamara
Groppa, Sergiu
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title_full Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title_fullStr Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title_short Inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
title_sort inhibitory and excitatory responses in the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex during threat processing
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1065469
work_keys_str_mv AT chirumamillavenkatac inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT gonzalezescamillagabriel inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT meyerbenjamin inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT anwarabdulrauf inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT dinghao inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT radetzangela inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT bonertztamara inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT groppasergiu inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing
AT muthuramanmuthuraman inhibitoryandexcitatoryresponsesinthedorsomedialprefrontalcortexduringthreatprocessing