Cargando…

Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a muscle mass evaluating tool and prognostic indicator for hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia is a syndrome of decreased muscle mass and deficits in muscle strength and physical function. We aimed to investigate the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and sarcopenia and the prognostic value of CCR in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Wen-He, Zhu, Yi-Bing, Yao, Yan, Huang, Hui-Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1058464
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia is a syndrome of decreased muscle mass and deficits in muscle strength and physical function. We aimed to investigate the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and sarcopenia and the prognostic value of CCR in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database up to August 25, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between CCR and skeletal muscle [computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle (CTASM), muscle strength, and physical performance], prognosis and important clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults. The pooled correlation coefficient, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and hazard ratio (HR) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies with 20,362 patients were eligible. These studies were of moderate to high quality. Our results showed that CCR was significant correlations with all CTASM types (Fisher’s Z ranged from 0.35 to 0.5; P values ranged from < 0.01 to 0.01), handgrip strength (Fisher’s Z = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32–0.45; P < 0.001) and gait speed (Fisher’s Z = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.21–0.30; P < 0.001). The ROC curves suggested that CCR had good diagnostic efficacy (0.689; 95% CI, 0.632–0.746; P < 0.01) for sarcopenia. CCR can reliably predict mortality in hospitalized patients, which was confirmed by regression analysis of CCR as both continuous (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72–0.84; P < 0.01) and categorical variables (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.58–2.66; P < 0.0001). In addition, less evidence showed that higher CCR was independently associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, less nutritional risk, and decreased complications in hospitalized patients. CONCLUSION: CCR could be a simple, economical, and effective screening tool for sarcopenia in hospitalized patients, and it is a helpful prognostic factor for mortality and other important clinical outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0097/, identifier INPLASY202290097.