Cargando…
Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792 |
_version_ | 1784876678764298240 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Xinfeng Li, Yingjie Wang, Shuailiang Zhang, Yan Chen, Xuetao Wei, Maomao Zhu, Hua Wu, Aiwen Yang, Zhi Wang, Xuejuan |
author_facet | Lin, Xinfeng Li, Yingjie Wang, Shuailiang Zhang, Yan Chen, Xuetao Wei, Maomao Zhu, Hua Wu, Aiwen Yang, Zhi Wang, Xuejuan |
author_sort | Lin, Xinfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and included 61 participants with CRC who underwent sequential evaluation through PET/CT with [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Their PET/CT images were analysed to quantify the uptake of the two tracers in the form of maximum standardised uptake (SUV(max)) values and target-to-background ratio (TBR), which were then compared using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The final changes in the tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage of all participants were recorded. RESULTS: Of all the participants, 21 were treatment naïve and 40 had been previously treated. In primary CRC lesions, the average TBRs of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]F-FDG were 13.3 ± 8.9 and 8.2 ± 6.5, respectively. The SUV(max) of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in signet-ring/mucinous carcinomas (11.4 ± 4.9) was higher than that of [(18)F]F-FDG (7.9 ± 3.6) (P = 0.03). Both median SUV(max) in peritoneal metastases and TBR in liver metastases of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 were higher than those of [(18)F]F-FDG (5.2 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; 3.7 vs. 1.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT, clinical TNM staging based on [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT led to upstaging and downstaging in 10 (16.4%) and 5 participants (8.2%), respectively. Therefore, the treatment options were changed in 13 participants (21.3%), including 9 with additional chemo/radiotherapy and/or surgery and others with avoidance or narrowed scope of surgery. CONCLUSION: [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 showed potential as a novel PET/CT tracer to detect lymph nodes and distant metastases, which improved CRC staging, thus prompting the optimisation or adjustment of treatment decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9869033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98690332023-01-24 Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Lin, Xinfeng Li, Yingjie Wang, Shuailiang Zhang, Yan Chen, Xuetao Wei, Maomao Zhu, Hua Wu, Aiwen Yang, Zhi Wang, Xuejuan Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and included 61 participants with CRC who underwent sequential evaluation through PET/CT with [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Their PET/CT images were analysed to quantify the uptake of the two tracers in the form of maximum standardised uptake (SUV(max)) values and target-to-background ratio (TBR), which were then compared using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The final changes in the tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage of all participants were recorded. RESULTS: Of all the participants, 21 were treatment naïve and 40 had been previously treated. In primary CRC lesions, the average TBRs of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]F-FDG were 13.3 ± 8.9 and 8.2 ± 6.5, respectively. The SUV(max) of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in signet-ring/mucinous carcinomas (11.4 ± 4.9) was higher than that of [(18)F]F-FDG (7.9 ± 3.6) (P = 0.03). Both median SUV(max) in peritoneal metastases and TBR in liver metastases of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 were higher than those of [(18)F]F-FDG (5.2 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; 3.7 vs. 1.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT, clinical TNM staging based on [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT led to upstaging and downstaging in 10 (16.4%) and 5 participants (8.2%), respectively. Therefore, the treatment options were changed in 13 participants (21.3%), including 9 with additional chemo/radiotherapy and/or surgery and others with avoidance or narrowed scope of surgery. CONCLUSION: [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 showed potential as a novel PET/CT tracer to detect lymph nodes and distant metastases, which improved CRC staging, thus prompting the optimisation or adjustment of treatment decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9869033/ /pubmed/36698416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lin, Li, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Wei, Zhu, Wu, Yang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Lin, Xinfeng Li, Yingjie Wang, Shuailiang Zhang, Yan Chen, Xuetao Wei, Maomao Zhu, Hua Wu, Aiwen Yang, Zhi Wang, Xuejuan Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title | Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title_full | Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title_short | Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT |
title_sort | diagnostic value of [(68)ga]ga-fapi-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)f]f-fdg pet/ct |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linxinfeng diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT liyingjie diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT wangshuailiang diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT zhangyan diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT chenxuetao diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT weimaomao diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT zhuhua diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT wuaiwen diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT yangzhi diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct AT wangxuejuan diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct |