Cargando…

Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Xinfeng, Li, Yingjie, Wang, Shuailiang, Zhang, Yan, Chen, Xuetao, Wei, Maomao, Zhu, Hua, Wu, Aiwen, Yang, Zhi, Wang, Xuejuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792
_version_ 1784876678764298240
author Lin, Xinfeng
Li, Yingjie
Wang, Shuailiang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Xuetao
Wei, Maomao
Zhu, Hua
Wu, Aiwen
Yang, Zhi
Wang, Xuejuan
author_facet Lin, Xinfeng
Li, Yingjie
Wang, Shuailiang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Xuetao
Wei, Maomao
Zhu, Hua
Wu, Aiwen
Yang, Zhi
Wang, Xuejuan
author_sort Lin, Xinfeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and included 61 participants with CRC who underwent sequential evaluation through PET/CT with [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Their PET/CT images were analysed to quantify the uptake of the two tracers in the form of maximum standardised uptake (SUV(max)) values and target-to-background ratio (TBR), which were then compared using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The final changes in the tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage of all participants were recorded. RESULTS: Of all the participants, 21 were treatment naïve and 40 had been previously treated. In primary CRC lesions, the average TBRs of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]F-FDG were 13.3 ± 8.9 and 8.2 ± 6.5, respectively. The SUV(max) of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in signet-ring/mucinous carcinomas (11.4 ± 4.9) was higher than that of [(18)F]F-FDG (7.9 ± 3.6) (P = 0.03). Both median SUV(max) in peritoneal metastases and TBR in liver metastases of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 were higher than those of [(18)F]F-FDG (5.2 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; 3.7 vs. 1.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT, clinical TNM staging based on [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT led to upstaging and downstaging in 10 (16.4%) and 5 participants (8.2%), respectively. Therefore, the treatment options were changed in 13 participants (21.3%), including 9 with additional chemo/radiotherapy and/or surgery and others with avoidance or narrowed scope of surgery. CONCLUSION: [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 showed potential as a novel PET/CT tracer to detect lymph nodes and distant metastases, which improved CRC staging, thus prompting the optimisation or adjustment of treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9869033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98690332023-01-24 Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Lin, Xinfeng Li, Yingjie Wang, Shuailiang Zhang, Yan Chen, Xuetao Wei, Maomao Zhu, Hua Wu, Aiwen Yang, Zhi Wang, Xuejuan Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. METHODS: This single-center preliminary clinical study (NCT04750772) was conducted at the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and included 61 participants with CRC who underwent sequential evaluation through PET/CT with [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Their PET/CT images were analysed to quantify the uptake of the two tracers in the form of maximum standardised uptake (SUV(max)) values and target-to-background ratio (TBR), which were then compared using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The final changes in the tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage of all participants were recorded. RESULTS: Of all the participants, 21 were treatment naïve and 40 had been previously treated. In primary CRC lesions, the average TBRs of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]F-FDG were 13.3 ± 8.9 and 8.2 ± 6.5, respectively. The SUV(max) of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in signet-ring/mucinous carcinomas (11.4 ± 4.9) was higher than that of [(18)F]F-FDG (7.9 ± 3.6) (P = 0.03). Both median SUV(max) in peritoneal metastases and TBR in liver metastases of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 were higher than those of [(18)F]F-FDG (5.2 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001; 3.7 vs. 1.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT, clinical TNM staging based on [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT led to upstaging and downstaging in 10 (16.4%) and 5 participants (8.2%), respectively. Therefore, the treatment options were changed in 13 participants (21.3%), including 9 with additional chemo/radiotherapy and/or surgery and others with avoidance or narrowed scope of surgery. CONCLUSION: [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 showed potential as a novel PET/CT tracer to detect lymph nodes and distant metastases, which improved CRC staging, thus prompting the optimisation or adjustment of treatment decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9869033/ /pubmed/36698416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lin, Li, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Wei, Zhu, Wu, Yang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Lin, Xinfeng
Li, Yingjie
Wang, Shuailiang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Xuetao
Wei, Maomao
Zhu, Hua
Wu, Aiwen
Yang, Zhi
Wang, Xuejuan
Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title_full Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title_short Diagnostic value of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT
title_sort diagnostic value of [(68)ga]ga-fapi-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [(18)f]f-fdg pet/ct
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1087792
work_keys_str_mv AT linxinfeng diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT liyingjie diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT wangshuailiang diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT zhangyan diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT chenxuetao diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT weimaomao diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT zhuhua diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT wuaiwen diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT yangzhi diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct
AT wangxuejuan diagnosticvalueof68gagafapi04inpatientswithcolorectalcancerincomparisonwith18fffdgpetct