Cargando…

Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community

Processes of evolutionary transition (ET), becoming part of a new reproducing collective while losing the capacity of independent reproduction, seem difficult to track without circularity, since their features—units of selection, individuality, inheritance at multiple levels (MLS1, MLS2)—are product...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griesemer, James, Shavit, Ayelet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0398
_version_ 1784876771153281024
author Griesemer, James
Shavit, Ayelet
author_facet Griesemer, James
Shavit, Ayelet
author_sort Griesemer, James
collection PubMed
description Processes of evolutionary transition (ET), becoming part of a new reproducing collective while losing the capacity of independent reproduction, seem difficult to track without circularity, since their features—units of selection, individuality, inheritance at multiple levels (MLS1, MLS2)—are products of one process. We describe ET in a non-circular way, noting kinds of interactions among community members necessary for such major transitions that are not instances of those same interactions within community members. Reproducing ‘systems’ tend to hybridize with environmental components, employing eco–devo scaffolding interactions forming communities. Communities are developmentally scaffolded systems of diverse members engaged in heterogeneous interactions. They may become individuals in their own right with the potential to evolve an inheritance system at the emergent community level. We argue for the explanatory benefits of treating ‘individuality’ as a special case of ‘collectivity’. We characterize an idealized sequence of collective processes—coordination, cooperation and collaboration (3Cs)—which scaffolds transitions to new forms of collective individuality: communities. Hominid evolution and learning draw attention to developmental interactions driving both dimensions of ET: new ‘levels of individuality’ and inherited ‘information systems’. Here, we outline a theoretical perspective that we suggest applies across a wide range of cases and scenarios. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9869437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98694372023-01-31 Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community Griesemer, James Shavit, Ayelet Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Processes of evolutionary transition (ET), becoming part of a new reproducing collective while losing the capacity of independent reproduction, seem difficult to track without circularity, since their features—units of selection, individuality, inheritance at multiple levels (MLS1, MLS2)—are products of one process. We describe ET in a non-circular way, noting kinds of interactions among community members necessary for such major transitions that are not instances of those same interactions within community members. Reproducing ‘systems’ tend to hybridize with environmental components, employing eco–devo scaffolding interactions forming communities. Communities are developmentally scaffolded systems of diverse members engaged in heterogeneous interactions. They may become individuals in their own right with the potential to evolve an inheritance system at the emergent community level. We argue for the explanatory benefits of treating ‘individuality’ as a special case of ‘collectivity’. We characterize an idealized sequence of collective processes—coordination, cooperation and collaboration (3Cs)—which scaffolds transitions to new forms of collective individuality: communities. Hominid evolution and learning draw attention to developmental interactions driving both dimensions of ET: new ‘levels of individuality’ and inherited ‘information systems’. Here, we outline a theoretical perspective that we suggest applies across a wide range of cases and scenarios. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions’. The Royal Society 2023-03-13 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9869437/ /pubmed/36688398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0398 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Griesemer, James
Shavit, Ayelet
Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title_full Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title_fullStr Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title_full_unstemmed Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title_short Scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
title_sort scaffolding individuality: coordination, cooperation, collaboration and community
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0398
work_keys_str_mv AT griesemerjames scaffoldingindividualitycoordinationcooperationcollaborationandcommunity
AT shavitayelet scaffoldingindividualitycoordinationcooperationcollaborationandcommunity