Cargando…

Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)

Floral scent is vital for pollinator attraction and varies among and within plant species. However, little is known about how inter-individual variation in floral scent affects the abundance and composition of floral visitor assemblages within populations. Moreover, for deceptive plants it is predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gfrerer, Eva, Laina, Danae, Gibernau, Marc, Comes, Hans Peter, Hörger, Anja C., Dötterl, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1046532
_version_ 1784876778523721728
author Gfrerer, Eva
Laina, Danae
Gibernau, Marc
Comes, Hans Peter
Hörger, Anja C.
Dötterl, Stefan
author_facet Gfrerer, Eva
Laina, Danae
Gibernau, Marc
Comes, Hans Peter
Hörger, Anja C.
Dötterl, Stefan
author_sort Gfrerer, Eva
collection PubMed
description Floral scent is vital for pollinator attraction and varies among and within plant species. However, little is known about how inter-individual variation in floral scent affects the abundance and composition of floral visitor assemblages within populations. Moreover, for deceptive plants it is predicted that intra-population variation in scent can be maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection, but empirical evidence is still lacking. To investigate the ecological and evolutionary relations between inter-individual scent variation (i.e., total emission and composition) and floral visitors in deceptive plants, we studied floral scent, visitor assemblages, and fruit set in two populations of fly-pollinated (Psychodidae, Sphaeroceridae; Diptera) and deceptive Arum maculatum from Austria (JOS) and northern Italy (DAO). By correlating individual data on floral scent and visitor assemblages, we show that inter-individual variation in floral scent partly explains variation in visitor assemblages. The quantity of floral scent emitted per individual correlated positively with visitor abundance in both populations but explained visitor composition only in DAO, where strongly scented inflorescences attracted more sphaerocerid flies. However, in each population, the composition of floral scent did not correlate with the composition of floral visitors. There was also no evidence of negative frequency-dependent selection on floral scent. Instead, in JOS, more frequent scent phenotypes attracted more pollinators and were more likely to set an infructescence than rarer ones. Our results show that floral scent, despite being key in pollinator attraction in A. maculatum, only partly explains variation in pollinator abundance and composition. Overall, this study is the first to shed light on the importance of inter-individual variation in floral scent in explaining floral visitor assemblages at the population level in a deceptive plant species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9869488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98694882023-01-24 Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae) Gfrerer, Eva Laina, Danae Gibernau, Marc Comes, Hans Peter Hörger, Anja C. Dötterl, Stefan Front Plant Sci Plant Science Floral scent is vital for pollinator attraction and varies among and within plant species. However, little is known about how inter-individual variation in floral scent affects the abundance and composition of floral visitor assemblages within populations. Moreover, for deceptive plants it is predicted that intra-population variation in scent can be maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection, but empirical evidence is still lacking. To investigate the ecological and evolutionary relations between inter-individual scent variation (i.e., total emission and composition) and floral visitors in deceptive plants, we studied floral scent, visitor assemblages, and fruit set in two populations of fly-pollinated (Psychodidae, Sphaeroceridae; Diptera) and deceptive Arum maculatum from Austria (JOS) and northern Italy (DAO). By correlating individual data on floral scent and visitor assemblages, we show that inter-individual variation in floral scent partly explains variation in visitor assemblages. The quantity of floral scent emitted per individual correlated positively with visitor abundance in both populations but explained visitor composition only in DAO, where strongly scented inflorescences attracted more sphaerocerid flies. However, in each population, the composition of floral scent did not correlate with the composition of floral visitors. There was also no evidence of negative frequency-dependent selection on floral scent. Instead, in JOS, more frequent scent phenotypes attracted more pollinators and were more likely to set an infructescence than rarer ones. Our results show that floral scent, despite being key in pollinator attraction in A. maculatum, only partly explains variation in pollinator abundance and composition. Overall, this study is the first to shed light on the importance of inter-individual variation in floral scent in explaining floral visitor assemblages at the population level in a deceptive plant species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9869488/ /pubmed/36699827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1046532 Text en Copyright © 2023 Gfrerer, Laina, Gibernau, Comes, Hörger and Dötterl https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Gfrerer, Eva
Laina, Danae
Gibernau, Marc
Comes, Hans Peter
Hörger, Anja C.
Dötterl, Stefan
Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title_full Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title_fullStr Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title_full_unstemmed Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title_short Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
title_sort variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive arum maculatum l. (araceae)
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1046532
work_keys_str_mv AT gfrerereva variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae
AT lainadanae variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae
AT gibernaumarc variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae
AT comeshanspeter variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae
AT horgeranjac variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae
AT dotterlstefan variationinscentamountbutnotincompositioncorrelateswithpollinatorvisitswithinpopulationsofdeceptivearummaculatumlaraceae