Cargando…
Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Fast-track is an evidence-based multidisciplinary strategy for pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of patients during major surgery. To date, fast-track has not been recognized or accepted in all surgical areas, particularly in orthopedic spine surgery where it still repre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w |
_version_ | 1784876801987706880 |
---|---|
author | Contartese, Deyanira Salamanna, Francesca Brogini, Silvia Martikos, Konstantinos Griffoni, Cristiana Ricci, Alessandro Visani, Andrea Fini, Milena Gasbarrini, Alessandro |
author_facet | Contartese, Deyanira Salamanna, Francesca Brogini, Silvia Martikos, Konstantinos Griffoni, Cristiana Ricci, Alessandro Visani, Andrea Fini, Milena Gasbarrini, Alessandro |
author_sort | Contartese, Deyanira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Fast-track is an evidence-based multidisciplinary strategy for pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of patients during major surgery. To date, fast-track has not been recognized or accepted in all surgical areas, particularly in orthopedic spine surgery where it still represents a relatively new paradigm. PURPOSE: The aim of this review was provided an evidenced-based assessment of specific interventions, measurement, and associated outcomes linked to enhanced recovery pathways in spine surgery field. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in three databases from February 2012 to August 2022 to assess the pre-, intra-, and postoperative key elements and the clinical evidence of fast-track protocols as well as specific interventions and associated outcomes, in patients undergoing to spine surgery. RESULTS: We included 57 full-text articles of which most were retrospective. Most common fast-track elements included patient’s education, multimodal analgesia, thrombo- and antibiotic prophylaxis, tranexamic acid use, urinary catheter and drainage removal within 24 hours after surgery, and early mobilization and nutrition. All studies demonstrated that these interventions were able to reduce patients’ length of stay (LOS) and opioid use. Comparative studies between fast-track and non-fast-track protocols also showed improved pain scores without increasing complication or readmission rates, thus improving patient’s satisfaction and functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: According to the review results, fast-track seems to be a successful tool to reduce LOS, accelerate return of function, minimize postoperative pain, and save costs in spine surgery. However, current studies are mainly on degenerative spine diseases and largely restricted to retrospective studies with non-randomized data, thus multicenter randomized trials comparing fast-track outcomes and implementation are mandatory to confirm its benefit in spine surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9869597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98695972023-01-24 Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review Contartese, Deyanira Salamanna, Francesca Brogini, Silvia Martikos, Konstantinos Griffoni, Cristiana Ricci, Alessandro Visani, Andrea Fini, Milena Gasbarrini, Alessandro BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Fast-track is an evidence-based multidisciplinary strategy for pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of patients during major surgery. To date, fast-track has not been recognized or accepted in all surgical areas, particularly in orthopedic spine surgery where it still represents a relatively new paradigm. PURPOSE: The aim of this review was provided an evidenced-based assessment of specific interventions, measurement, and associated outcomes linked to enhanced recovery pathways in spine surgery field. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in three databases from February 2012 to August 2022 to assess the pre-, intra-, and postoperative key elements and the clinical evidence of fast-track protocols as well as specific interventions and associated outcomes, in patients undergoing to spine surgery. RESULTS: We included 57 full-text articles of which most were retrospective. Most common fast-track elements included patient’s education, multimodal analgesia, thrombo- and antibiotic prophylaxis, tranexamic acid use, urinary catheter and drainage removal within 24 hours after surgery, and early mobilization and nutrition. All studies demonstrated that these interventions were able to reduce patients’ length of stay (LOS) and opioid use. Comparative studies between fast-track and non-fast-track protocols also showed improved pain scores without increasing complication or readmission rates, thus improving patient’s satisfaction and functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: According to the review results, fast-track seems to be a successful tool to reduce LOS, accelerate return of function, minimize postoperative pain, and save costs in spine surgery. However, current studies are mainly on degenerative spine diseases and largely restricted to retrospective studies with non-randomized data, thus multicenter randomized trials comparing fast-track outcomes and implementation are mandatory to confirm its benefit in spine surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w. BioMed Central 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9869597/ /pubmed/36683022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Contartese, Deyanira Salamanna, Francesca Brogini, Silvia Martikos, Konstantinos Griffoni, Cristiana Ricci, Alessandro Visani, Andrea Fini, Milena Gasbarrini, Alessandro Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title | Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT contartesedeyanira fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT salamannafrancesca fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT broginisilvia fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT martikoskonstantinos fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT griffonicristiana fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT riccialessandro fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT visaniandrea fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT finimilena fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview AT gasbarrinialessandro fasttrackprotocolsforpatientsundergoingspinesurgeryasystematicreview |