Cargando…

Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design

BACKGROUND: The many improvements in cancer therapies have led to an increased number of survivors, which comes with a greater risk of consequent/subsequent cardiovascular disease. Identifying effective management strategies that can mitigate this risk of cardiovascular complications is vital. There...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Sherry-Ann, Chung, Brian Y., Doshi, Krishna, Hamid, Abdulaziz, Pederson, Erin, Maddula, Ragasnehith, Hanna, Allen, Choudhuri, Indrajit, Sparapani, Rodney, Bagheri Mohamadi Pour, Mehri, Zhang, Jun, Kothari, Anai N., Collier, Patrick, Caraballo, Pedro, Noseworthy, Peter, Arruda-Olson, Adelaide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-022-00151-0
_version_ 1784876803448373248
author Brown, Sherry-Ann
Chung, Brian Y.
Doshi, Krishna
Hamid, Abdulaziz
Pederson, Erin
Maddula, Ragasnehith
Hanna, Allen
Choudhuri, Indrajit
Sparapani, Rodney
Bagheri Mohamadi Pour, Mehri
Zhang, Jun
Kothari, Anai N.
Collier, Patrick
Caraballo, Pedro
Noseworthy, Peter
Arruda-Olson, Adelaide
author_facet Brown, Sherry-Ann
Chung, Brian Y.
Doshi, Krishna
Hamid, Abdulaziz
Pederson, Erin
Maddula, Ragasnehith
Hanna, Allen
Choudhuri, Indrajit
Sparapani, Rodney
Bagheri Mohamadi Pour, Mehri
Zhang, Jun
Kothari, Anai N.
Collier, Patrick
Caraballo, Pedro
Noseworthy, Peter
Arruda-Olson, Adelaide
author_sort Brown, Sherry-Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The many improvements in cancer therapies have led to an increased number of survivors, which comes with a greater risk of consequent/subsequent cardiovascular disease. Identifying effective management strategies that can mitigate this risk of cardiovascular complications is vital. Therefore, developing computer-driven and personalized clinical decision aid interventions that can provide early detection of patients at risk, stratify that risk, and recommend specific cardio-oncology management guidelines and expert consensus recommendations is critically important. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of the use of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered clinical decision aid tool in shared decision making between the cancer survivor patient and the cardiologist regarding prevention of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: This is a single-center, double-arm, open-label, randomized interventional feasibility study. Our cardio-oncology cohort of > 4000 individuals from our Clinical Research Data Warehouse will be queried to identify at least 200 adult cancer survivors who meet the eligibility criteria. Study participants will be randomized into either the Clinical Decision Aid Group (where patients will use the clinical decision aid in addition to current practice) or the Control Group (current practice). The primary endpoint of this study is to assess for each patient encounter whether cardiovascular medications and imaging pursued were consistent with current medical society recommendations. Additionally, the perceptions of using the clinical decision tool will be evaluated based on patient and physician feedback through surveys and focus groups. SUMMARY: This trial will determine whether a clinical decision aid tool improves cancer survivors’ medication use and imaging surveillance recommendations aligned with current medical guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT05377320
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9869606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98696062023-01-24 Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design Brown, Sherry-Ann Chung, Brian Y. Doshi, Krishna Hamid, Abdulaziz Pederson, Erin Maddula, Ragasnehith Hanna, Allen Choudhuri, Indrajit Sparapani, Rodney Bagheri Mohamadi Pour, Mehri Zhang, Jun Kothari, Anai N. Collier, Patrick Caraballo, Pedro Noseworthy, Peter Arruda-Olson, Adelaide Cardiooncology Research BACKGROUND: The many improvements in cancer therapies have led to an increased number of survivors, which comes with a greater risk of consequent/subsequent cardiovascular disease. Identifying effective management strategies that can mitigate this risk of cardiovascular complications is vital. Therefore, developing computer-driven and personalized clinical decision aid interventions that can provide early detection of patients at risk, stratify that risk, and recommend specific cardio-oncology management guidelines and expert consensus recommendations is critically important. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of the use of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered clinical decision aid tool in shared decision making between the cancer survivor patient and the cardiologist regarding prevention of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: This is a single-center, double-arm, open-label, randomized interventional feasibility study. Our cardio-oncology cohort of > 4000 individuals from our Clinical Research Data Warehouse will be queried to identify at least 200 adult cancer survivors who meet the eligibility criteria. Study participants will be randomized into either the Clinical Decision Aid Group (where patients will use the clinical decision aid in addition to current practice) or the Control Group (current practice). The primary endpoint of this study is to assess for each patient encounter whether cardiovascular medications and imaging pursued were consistent with current medical society recommendations. Additionally, the perceptions of using the clinical decision tool will be evaluated based on patient and physician feedback through surveys and focus groups. SUMMARY: This trial will determine whether a clinical decision aid tool improves cancer survivors’ medication use and imaging surveillance recommendations aligned with current medical guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT05377320 BioMed Central 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9869606/ /pubmed/36691060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-022-00151-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Brown, Sherry-Ann
Chung, Brian Y.
Doshi, Krishna
Hamid, Abdulaziz
Pederson, Erin
Maddula, Ragasnehith
Hanna, Allen
Choudhuri, Indrajit
Sparapani, Rodney
Bagheri Mohamadi Pour, Mehri
Zhang, Jun
Kothari, Anai N.
Collier, Patrick
Caraballo, Pedro
Noseworthy, Peter
Arruda-Olson, Adelaide
Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title_full Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title_fullStr Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title_full_unstemmed Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title_short Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design
title_sort patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the prevention of cardiovascular toxicity (pact): a feasibility trial design
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-022-00151-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brownsherryann patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT chungbriany patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT doshikrishna patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT hamidabdulaziz patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT pedersonerin patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT maddularagasnehith patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT hannaallen patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT choudhuriindrajit patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT sparapanirodney patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT bagherimohamadipourmehri patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT zhangjun patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT kotharianain patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT collierpatrick patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT caraballopedro patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT noseworthypeter patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT arrudaolsonadelaide patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign
AT patientsimilarityandotherartificialintelligencemachinelearningalgorithmsinclinicaldecisionaidforshareddecisionmakinginthepreventionofcardiovasculartoxicitypactafeasibilitytrialdesign