Cargando…

Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND: The use of machine learning has the potential to estimate the probability of a second classification event more accurately than traditional statistical methods, and few previous studies on predicting new fractures after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) have focussed o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yiming, Lu, Qi, Yuan, Feng, Chen, Hongliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03551-9
_version_ 1784876805465833472
author Ma, Yiming
Lu, Qi
Yuan, Feng
Chen, Hongliang
author_facet Ma, Yiming
Lu, Qi
Yuan, Feng
Chen, Hongliang
author_sort Ma, Yiming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of machine learning has the potential to estimate the probability of a second classification event more accurately than traditional statistical methods, and few previous studies on predicting new fractures after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) have focussed on this point. The aim of this study was to explore whether several different machine learning models could produce better predictions than logistic regression models and to select an optimal model. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 529 patients who underwent percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for OVCFs at our institution between June 2017 and June 2020 was performed. The patient data were used to create machine learning (including decision trees (DT), random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), gradient boosting machines (GBM), neural networks (NNET), and regularized discriminant analysis (RDA)) and logistic regression models (LR) to estimate the probability of new fractures occurring after surgery. The dataset was divided into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%), and machine learning models were built in the training set after ten cross-validations, after which each model was evaluated in the test set, and model performance was assessed by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of each model. RESULTS: Among the six machine learning algorithms, except that the AUC of DT [0.775 (95% CI 0.728–0.822)] was lower than that of LR [0.831 (95% CI 0.783–0.878)], RA [0.953 (95% CI 0.927–0.980)], GBM [0.941 (95% CI 0.911–0.971)], SVM [0.869 (95% CI 0.827–0.910), NNET [0.869 (95% CI 0.826–0.912)], and RDA [0.890 (95% CI 0.851–0.929)] were all better than LR. CONCLUSIONS: For prediction of the probability of new fracture after PKP, machine learning algorithms outperformed logistic regression, with random forest having the strongest predictive power. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9869614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98696142023-01-24 Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Ma, Yiming Lu, Qi Yuan, Feng Chen, Hongliang J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of machine learning has the potential to estimate the probability of a second classification event more accurately than traditional statistical methods, and few previous studies on predicting new fractures after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) have focussed on this point. The aim of this study was to explore whether several different machine learning models could produce better predictions than logistic regression models and to select an optimal model. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 529 patients who underwent percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for OVCFs at our institution between June 2017 and June 2020 was performed. The patient data were used to create machine learning (including decision trees (DT), random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), gradient boosting machines (GBM), neural networks (NNET), and regularized discriminant analysis (RDA)) and logistic regression models (LR) to estimate the probability of new fractures occurring after surgery. The dataset was divided into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%), and machine learning models were built in the training set after ten cross-validations, after which each model was evaluated in the test set, and model performance was assessed by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of each model. RESULTS: Among the six machine learning algorithms, except that the AUC of DT [0.775 (95% CI 0.728–0.822)] was lower than that of LR [0.831 (95% CI 0.783–0.878)], RA [0.953 (95% CI 0.927–0.980)], GBM [0.941 (95% CI 0.911–0.971)], SVM [0.869 (95% CI 0.827–0.910), NNET [0.869 (95% CI 0.826–0.912)], and RDA [0.890 (95% CI 0.851–0.929)] were all better than LR. CONCLUSIONS: For prediction of the probability of new fracture after PKP, machine learning algorithms outperformed logistic regression, with random forest having the strongest predictive power. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9869614/ /pubmed/36683045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03551-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Yiming
Lu, Qi
Yuan, Feng
Chen, Hongliang
Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after pkp for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03551-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mayiming comparisonoftheeffectivenessofdifferentmachinelearningalgorithmsinpredictingnewfracturesafterpkpforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT luqi comparisonoftheeffectivenessofdifferentmachinelearningalgorithmsinpredictingnewfracturesafterpkpforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT yuanfeng comparisonoftheeffectivenessofdifferentmachinelearningalgorithmsinpredictingnewfracturesafterpkpforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT chenhongliang comparisonoftheeffectivenessofdifferentmachinelearningalgorithmsinpredictingnewfracturesafterpkpforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures