Cargando…

An artificial intelligence model for the pathological diagnosis of invasion depth and histologic grade in bladder cancer

BACKGROUND: Accurate pathological diagnosis of invasion depth and histologic grade is key for clinical management in patients with bladder cancer (BCa), but it is labour-intensive, experience-dependent and subject to interobserver variability. Here, we aimed to develop a pathological artificial inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Jiexin, Hong, Guibin, Zeng, Hong, Liao, Chengxiao, Li, Huarun, Yao, Yuhui, Gan, Qinghua, Wang, Yun, Wu, Shaoxu, Lin, Tianxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03888-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Accurate pathological diagnosis of invasion depth and histologic grade is key for clinical management in patients with bladder cancer (BCa), but it is labour-intensive, experience-dependent and subject to interobserver variability. Here, we aimed to develop a pathological artificial intelligence diagnostic model (PAIDM) for BCa diagnosis. METHODS: A total of 854 whole slide images (WSIs) from 692 patients were included and divided into training and validation sets. The PAIDM was developed using the training set based on the deep learning algorithm ScanNet, and the performance was verified at the patch level in validation set 1 and at the WSI level in validation set 2. An independent validation cohort (validation set 3) was employed to compare the PAIDM and pathologists. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. RESULTS: The AUCs of the PAIDM were 0.878 (95% CI 0.875–0.881) at the patch level in validation set 1 and 0.870 (95% CI 0.805–0.923) at the WSI level in validation set 2. In comparing the PAIDM and pathologists, the PAIDM achieved an AUC of 0.847 (95% CI 0.779–0.905), which was non-inferior to the average diagnostic level of pathologists. There was high consistency between the model-predicted and manually annotated areas, improving the PAIDM’s interpretability. CONCLUSIONS: We reported an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model for BCa that performed well in identifying invasion depth and histologic grade. Importantly, the PAIDM performed admirably in patch-level recognition, with a promising application for transurethral resection specimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-023-03888-z.