Cargando…

The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations

BACKGROUND: Patients’ expectations, as a central mechanism behind placebo and nocebo effects, are an important predictor of health outcomes. Yet, theoretically based generic assessment tools allowing for an integrated understanding of expectations across conditions and treatments are lacking. Based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shedden-Mora, Meike C., Alberts, Jannis, Petrie, Keith J., Laferton, Johannes A. C., von Blanckenburg, Pia, Kohlmann, Sebastian, Nestoriuc, Yvonne, Löwe, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36689398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280472
_version_ 1784876901379080192
author Shedden-Mora, Meike C.
Alberts, Jannis
Petrie, Keith J.
Laferton, Johannes A. C.
von Blanckenburg, Pia
Kohlmann, Sebastian
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Löwe, Bernd
author_facet Shedden-Mora, Meike C.
Alberts, Jannis
Petrie, Keith J.
Laferton, Johannes A. C.
von Blanckenburg, Pia
Kohlmann, Sebastian
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Löwe, Bernd
author_sort Shedden-Mora, Meike C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ expectations, as a central mechanism behind placebo and nocebo effects, are an important predictor of health outcomes. Yet, theoretically based generic assessment tools allowing for an integrated understanding of expectations across conditions and treatments are lacking. Based on the preliminary 35-item version, this study reports the development and validation of the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q), a generic, multidimensional self-report scale measuring patients’ expectations of medical and psychological treatments. METHODS: The TEX-Q was developed in a validation sample of n = 251 patients undergoing different treatments using exploratory factor analyses and item analyses, as well as analysis of convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in an independent sample of n = 303 patients undergoing cancer treatment. Two-weeks test-retest reliability was assessed in n = 28 psychosomatic outpatients. RESULTS: Factor analyses revealed six theoretically founded stable subscales. The TEX-Q assesses expectations of treatment benefit, positive impact, adverse events, negative impact, process and behavioural control with a total of 15 items. Results for the subscales and the sum score indicated good internal consistency (α = .71-.92), moderate to high test-retest reliability (r = .39-.76) as well as good convergent validity with regard to other expectation measures (r = .42-.58) and divergent validity with regard to measures of generalized expectations (r < .32) and psychopathology (r < .28). CONCLUSIONS: While further validation is needed, the results suggest that the TEX-Q is a valid and reliable scale for the generic, multidimensional assessment of patients’ treatment expectations. The TEX-Q overcomes constraints of ad-hoc and disease-specific scales, while allowing to compare the impact of different expectation constructs across conditions and treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9870103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98701032023-01-24 The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations Shedden-Mora, Meike C. Alberts, Jannis Petrie, Keith J. Laferton, Johannes A. C. von Blanckenburg, Pia Kohlmann, Sebastian Nestoriuc, Yvonne Löwe, Bernd PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients’ expectations, as a central mechanism behind placebo and nocebo effects, are an important predictor of health outcomes. Yet, theoretically based generic assessment tools allowing for an integrated understanding of expectations across conditions and treatments are lacking. Based on the preliminary 35-item version, this study reports the development and validation of the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q), a generic, multidimensional self-report scale measuring patients’ expectations of medical and psychological treatments. METHODS: The TEX-Q was developed in a validation sample of n = 251 patients undergoing different treatments using exploratory factor analyses and item analyses, as well as analysis of convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in an independent sample of n = 303 patients undergoing cancer treatment. Two-weeks test-retest reliability was assessed in n = 28 psychosomatic outpatients. RESULTS: Factor analyses revealed six theoretically founded stable subscales. The TEX-Q assesses expectations of treatment benefit, positive impact, adverse events, negative impact, process and behavioural control with a total of 15 items. Results for the subscales and the sum score indicated good internal consistency (α = .71-.92), moderate to high test-retest reliability (r = .39-.76) as well as good convergent validity with regard to other expectation measures (r = .42-.58) and divergent validity with regard to measures of generalized expectations (r < .32) and psychopathology (r < .28). CONCLUSIONS: While further validation is needed, the results suggest that the TEX-Q is a valid and reliable scale for the generic, multidimensional assessment of patients’ treatment expectations. The TEX-Q overcomes constraints of ad-hoc and disease-specific scales, while allowing to compare the impact of different expectation constructs across conditions and treatments. Public Library of Science 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9870103/ /pubmed/36689398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280472 Text en © 2023 Shedden-Mora et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shedden-Mora, Meike C.
Alberts, Jannis
Petrie, Keith J.
Laferton, Johannes A. C.
von Blanckenburg, Pia
Kohlmann, Sebastian
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Löwe, Bernd
The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title_full The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title_fullStr The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title_full_unstemmed The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title_short The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
title_sort treatment expectation questionnaire (tex-q): validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients’ treatment expectations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36689398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280472
work_keys_str_mv AT sheddenmorameikec thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT albertsjannis thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT petriekeithj thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT lafertonjohannesac thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT vonblanckenburgpia thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT kohlmannsebastian thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT nestoriucyvonne thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT lowebernd thetreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT sheddenmorameikec treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT albertsjannis treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT petriekeithj treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT lafertonjohannesac treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT vonblanckenburgpia treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT kohlmannsebastian treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT nestoriucyvonne treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations
AT lowebernd treatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqvalidationofagenericmultidimensionalscalemeasuringpatientstreatmentexpectations