Cargando…

Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)

Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Jeffrey S., Schadendorf, Dirk, Del Vecchio, Michele, Larkin, James, Atkinson, Victoria, Schenker, Michael, Pigozzo, Jacopo, Gogas, Helen, Dalle, Stéphane, Meyer, Nicolas, Ascierto, Paolo A., Sandhu, Shahneen, Eigentler, Thomas, Gutzmer, Ralf, Hassel, Jessica C., Robert, Caroline, Carlino, Matteo S., Di Giacomo, Anna Maria, Butler, Marcus O., Muñoz-Couselo, Eva, Brown, Michael P., Rutkowski, Piotr, Haydon, Andrew, Grob, Jean-Jacques, Schachter, Jacob, Queirolo, Paola, de la Cruz-Merino, Luis, van der Westhuizen, Andre, Menzies, Alexander M., Re, Sandra, Bas, Tuba, de Pril, Veerle, Braverman, Julia, Tenney, Daniel J., Tang, Hao, Long, Georgina V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533
_version_ 1784876929380253696
author Weber, Jeffrey S.
Schadendorf, Dirk
Del Vecchio, Michele
Larkin, James
Atkinson, Victoria
Schenker, Michael
Pigozzo, Jacopo
Gogas, Helen
Dalle, Stéphane
Meyer, Nicolas
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Sandhu, Shahneen
Eigentler, Thomas
Gutzmer, Ralf
Hassel, Jessica C.
Robert, Caroline
Carlino, Matteo S.
Di Giacomo, Anna Maria
Butler, Marcus O.
Muñoz-Couselo, Eva
Brown, Michael P.
Rutkowski, Piotr
Haydon, Andrew
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Schachter, Jacob
Queirolo, Paola
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
van der Westhuizen, Andre
Menzies, Alexander M.
Re, Sandra
Bas, Tuba
de Pril, Veerle
Braverman, Julia
Tenney, Daniel J.
Tang, Hao
Long, Georgina V.
author_facet Weber, Jeffrey S.
Schadendorf, Dirk
Del Vecchio, Michele
Larkin, James
Atkinson, Victoria
Schenker, Michael
Pigozzo, Jacopo
Gogas, Helen
Dalle, Stéphane
Meyer, Nicolas
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Sandhu, Shahneen
Eigentler, Thomas
Gutzmer, Ralf
Hassel, Jessica C.
Robert, Caroline
Carlino, Matteo S.
Di Giacomo, Anna Maria
Butler, Marcus O.
Muñoz-Couselo, Eva
Brown, Michael P.
Rutkowski, Piotr
Haydon, Andrew
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Schachter, Jacob
Queirolo, Paola
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
van der Westhuizen, Andre
Menzies, Alexander M.
Re, Sandra
Bas, Tuba
de Pril, Veerle
Braverman, Julia
Tenney, Daniel J.
Tang, Hao
Long, Georgina V.
author_sort Weber, Jeffrey S.
collection PubMed
description Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9870220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98702202023-01-24 Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) Weber, Jeffrey S. Schadendorf, Dirk Del Vecchio, Michele Larkin, James Atkinson, Victoria Schenker, Michael Pigozzo, Jacopo Gogas, Helen Dalle, Stéphane Meyer, Nicolas Ascierto, Paolo A. Sandhu, Shahneen Eigentler, Thomas Gutzmer, Ralf Hassel, Jessica C. Robert, Caroline Carlino, Matteo S. Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Butler, Marcus O. Muñoz-Couselo, Eva Brown, Michael P. Rutkowski, Piotr Haydon, Andrew Grob, Jean-Jacques Schachter, Jacob Queirolo, Paola de la Cruz-Merino, Luis van der Westhuizen, Andre Menzies, Alexander M. Re, Sandra Bas, Tuba de Pril, Veerle Braverman, Julia Tenney, Daniel J. Tang, Hao Long, Georgina V. J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-01-20 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9870220/ /pubmed/36162037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Weber, Jeffrey S.
Schadendorf, Dirk
Del Vecchio, Michele
Larkin, James
Atkinson, Victoria
Schenker, Michael
Pigozzo, Jacopo
Gogas, Helen
Dalle, Stéphane
Meyer, Nicolas
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Sandhu, Shahneen
Eigentler, Thomas
Gutzmer, Ralf
Hassel, Jessica C.
Robert, Caroline
Carlino, Matteo S.
Di Giacomo, Anna Maria
Butler, Marcus O.
Muñoz-Couselo, Eva
Brown, Michael P.
Rutkowski, Piotr
Haydon, Andrew
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Schachter, Jacob
Queirolo, Paola
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
van der Westhuizen, Andre
Menzies, Alexander M.
Re, Sandra
Bas, Tuba
de Pril, Veerle
Braverman, Julia
Tenney, Daniel J.
Tang, Hao
Long, Georgina V.
Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title_full Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title_fullStr Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title_short Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
title_sort adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage iiib-d or stage iv melanoma (checkmate 915)
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533
work_keys_str_mv AT weberjeffreys adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT schadendorfdirk adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT delvecchiomichele adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT larkinjames adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT atkinsonvictoria adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT schenkermichael adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT pigozzojacopo adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT gogashelen adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT dallestephane adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT meyernicolas adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT asciertopaoloa adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT sandhushahneen adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT eigentlerthomas adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT gutzmerralf adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT hasseljessicac adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT robertcaroline adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT carlinomatteos adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT digiacomoannamaria adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT butlermarcuso adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT munozcouseloeva adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT brownmichaelp adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT rutkowskipiotr adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT haydonandrew adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT grobjeanjacques adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT schachterjacob adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT queirolopaola adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT delacruzmerinoluis adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT vanderwesthuizenandre adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT menziesalexanderm adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT resandra adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT bastuba adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT deprilveerle adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT bravermanjulia adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT tenneydanielj adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT tanghao adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915
AT longgeorginav adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915