Cargando…
Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)
Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-bl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533 |
_version_ | 1784876929380253696 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Jeffrey S. Schadendorf, Dirk Del Vecchio, Michele Larkin, James Atkinson, Victoria Schenker, Michael Pigozzo, Jacopo Gogas, Helen Dalle, Stéphane Meyer, Nicolas Ascierto, Paolo A. Sandhu, Shahneen Eigentler, Thomas Gutzmer, Ralf Hassel, Jessica C. Robert, Caroline Carlino, Matteo S. Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Butler, Marcus O. Muñoz-Couselo, Eva Brown, Michael P. Rutkowski, Piotr Haydon, Andrew Grob, Jean-Jacques Schachter, Jacob Queirolo, Paola de la Cruz-Merino, Luis van der Westhuizen, Andre Menzies, Alexander M. Re, Sandra Bas, Tuba de Pril, Veerle Braverman, Julia Tenney, Daniel J. Tang, Hao Long, Georgina V. |
author_facet | Weber, Jeffrey S. Schadendorf, Dirk Del Vecchio, Michele Larkin, James Atkinson, Victoria Schenker, Michael Pigozzo, Jacopo Gogas, Helen Dalle, Stéphane Meyer, Nicolas Ascierto, Paolo A. Sandhu, Shahneen Eigentler, Thomas Gutzmer, Ralf Hassel, Jessica C. Robert, Caroline Carlino, Matteo S. Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Butler, Marcus O. Muñoz-Couselo, Eva Brown, Michael P. Rutkowski, Piotr Haydon, Andrew Grob, Jean-Jacques Schachter, Jacob Queirolo, Paola de la Cruz-Merino, Luis van der Westhuizen, Andre Menzies, Alexander M. Re, Sandra Bas, Tuba de Pril, Veerle Braverman, Julia Tenney, Daniel J. Tang, Hao Long, Georgina V. |
author_sort | Weber, Jeffrey S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9870220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98702202023-01-24 Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) Weber, Jeffrey S. Schadendorf, Dirk Del Vecchio, Michele Larkin, James Atkinson, Victoria Schenker, Michael Pigozzo, Jacopo Gogas, Helen Dalle, Stéphane Meyer, Nicolas Ascierto, Paolo A. Sandhu, Shahneen Eigentler, Thomas Gutzmer, Ralf Hassel, Jessica C. Robert, Caroline Carlino, Matteo S. Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Butler, Marcus O. Muñoz-Couselo, Eva Brown, Michael P. Rutkowski, Piotr Haydon, Andrew Grob, Jean-Jacques Schachter, Jacob Queirolo, Paola de la Cruz-Merino, Luis van der Westhuizen, Andre Menzies, Alexander M. Re, Sandra Bas, Tuba de Pril, Veerle Braverman, Julia Tenney, Daniel J. Tang, Hao Long, Georgina V. J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-01-20 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9870220/ /pubmed/36162037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Weber, Jeffrey S. Schadendorf, Dirk Del Vecchio, Michele Larkin, James Atkinson, Victoria Schenker, Michael Pigozzo, Jacopo Gogas, Helen Dalle, Stéphane Meyer, Nicolas Ascierto, Paolo A. Sandhu, Shahneen Eigentler, Thomas Gutzmer, Ralf Hassel, Jessica C. Robert, Caroline Carlino, Matteo S. Di Giacomo, Anna Maria Butler, Marcus O. Muñoz-Couselo, Eva Brown, Michael P. Rutkowski, Piotr Haydon, Andrew Grob, Jean-Jacques Schachter, Jacob Queirolo, Paola de la Cruz-Merino, Luis van der Westhuizen, Andre Menzies, Alexander M. Re, Sandra Bas, Tuba de Pril, Veerle Braverman, Julia Tenney, Daniel J. Tang, Hao Long, Georgina V. Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title | Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title_full | Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title_fullStr | Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title_full_unstemmed | Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title_short | Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915) |
title_sort | adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage iiib-d or stage iv melanoma (checkmate 915) |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberjeffreys adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT schadendorfdirk adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT delvecchiomichele adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT larkinjames adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT atkinsonvictoria adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT schenkermichael adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT pigozzojacopo adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT gogashelen adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT dallestephane adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT meyernicolas adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT asciertopaoloa adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT sandhushahneen adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT eigentlerthomas adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT gutzmerralf adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT hasseljessicac adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT robertcaroline adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT carlinomatteos adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT digiacomoannamaria adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT butlermarcuso adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT munozcouseloeva adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT brownmichaelp adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT rutkowskipiotr adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT haydonandrew adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT grobjeanjacques adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT schachterjacob adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT queirolopaola adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT delacruzmerinoluis adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT vanderwesthuizenandre adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT menziesalexanderm adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT resandra adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT bastuba adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT deprilveerle adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT bravermanjulia adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT tenneydanielj adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT tanghao adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 AT longgeorginav adjuvanttherapyofnivolumabcombinedwithipilimumabversusnivolumabaloneinpatientswithresectedstageiiibdorstageivmelanomacheckmate915 |