Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin

Background. Considering the increased use of preheating and novel resin-based materials to restore teeth, the present study investigated the impact of preheating on the flexural strength of a giomer and compared it with a nanohybrid composite resin. Methods. Two restorative materials (Beautifil II g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimyai, Soodabeh, Mashayekhi, Zahra, Mohammadi, Narmin, Bahari, Mahmoud, Abed Kahnamouei, Mahdi, Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704183
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.027
_version_ 1784877109726937088
author Kimyai, Soodabeh
Mashayekhi, Zahra
Mohammadi, Narmin
Bahari, Mahmoud
Abed Kahnamouei, Mahdi
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
author_facet Kimyai, Soodabeh
Mashayekhi, Zahra
Mohammadi, Narmin
Bahari, Mahmoud
Abed Kahnamouei, Mahdi
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
author_sort Kimyai, Soodabeh
collection PubMed
description Background. Considering the increased use of preheating and novel resin-based materials to restore teeth, the present study investigated the impact of preheating on the flexural strength of a giomer and compared it with a nanohybrid composite resin. Methods. Two restorative materials (Beautifil II giomer and Alpha III nanohybrid composite resin) were used. Thirty rod-shaped samples (adding up to 60 samples) were prepared from the materials above and divided into two subgroups: with and without preheating (n=15). Before sample preparation, the giomer and nanohybrid composite resin tubes were preheated at 68ºC for 15 minutes in the preheating subgroups. In the subgroups without preheating, the tubes were kept in a room at 25ºC. Then the flexural strength was compared between the two groups with two-way ANOVA at a significance level of P<0.05. Results. The results showed significantly higher flexural strength in the preheated subgroups than in the non-preheated subgroups (P<0.001). In addition, the mean flexural strength values were significantly higher in the giomer groups than in the nanohybrid composite resin groups (P<0.001). Conclusion. Preheating increased the studied materials’ flexural strengths significantly. The flexural strength of the giomer restorative material was higher than that of the nanohybrid composite resin, irrespective of preheating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98711712023-01-25 Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin Kimyai, Soodabeh Mashayekhi, Zahra Mohammadi, Narmin Bahari, Mahmoud Abed Kahnamouei, Mahdi Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. Considering the increased use of preheating and novel resin-based materials to restore teeth, the present study investigated the impact of preheating on the flexural strength of a giomer and compared it with a nanohybrid composite resin. Methods. Two restorative materials (Beautifil II giomer and Alpha III nanohybrid composite resin) were used. Thirty rod-shaped samples (adding up to 60 samples) were prepared from the materials above and divided into two subgroups: with and without preheating (n=15). Before sample preparation, the giomer and nanohybrid composite resin tubes were preheated at 68ºC for 15 minutes in the preheating subgroups. In the subgroups without preheating, the tubes were kept in a room at 25ºC. Then the flexural strength was compared between the two groups with two-way ANOVA at a significance level of P<0.05. Results. The results showed significantly higher flexural strength in the preheated subgroups than in the non-preheated subgroups (P<0.001). In addition, the mean flexural strength values were significantly higher in the giomer groups than in the nanohybrid composite resin groups (P<0.001). Conclusion. Preheating increased the studied materials’ flexural strengths significantly. The flexural strength of the giomer restorative material was higher than that of the nanohybrid composite resin, irrespective of preheating. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9871171/ /pubmed/36704183 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.027 Text en ©2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Mashayekhi, Zahra
Mohammadi, Narmin
Bahari, Mahmoud
Abed Kahnamouei, Mahdi
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title_full Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title_short Comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
title_sort comparison of the effect of preheating on the flexural strength of giomer and nanohybrid composite resin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704183
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.027
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyaisoodabeh comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin
AT mashayekhizahra comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin
AT mohammadinarmin comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin
AT baharimahmoud comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin
AT abedkahnamoueimahdi comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin
AT ebrahimichaharommohammadesmaeel comparisonoftheeffectofpreheatingontheflexuralstrengthofgiomerandnanohybridcompositeresin